I'm saying give them a chance to show the public what they've got.
If the public like it then there's more room for discussion for it to be considered a feasible solution to Muslim led crimes. If the public don't then there's room for looking into why this can't be given the working service of due process already.
Hint: It's all about who control the law - regardless of whether it is the current set-up or a Sharia one.
give them a chance to show the public what they've got.
The mudslimes and their rape clans have been living off welfare meant for British people and carrying out that vile desecration of British children for well over a decade with the backing of the British government. They deserve no second chances.
feasible solution to Muslim led crimes
The only feasible solution to muslim invasion is retribution. Cold, silent and asymmetrical at first, then over time like an expanding shock wave, targeting their enablers, dealers, lawyers, police contacts and handlers, until their entire system of control collapses into a mass exodus.
Some mudslimes call me 'a jew' for my hatred of muslims, but I don't really care.
I really don't care what football team one side or the other supports.
The law is the law and it is for the benefit of all people.
The law doesn't seem to be working just now, at least not the King's Court law. Why not see how Muslims would deal with 'their own' under Sharia law and then let the public give their thoughts on the matter?
If it is better then we can scrap the King's law for sure. If it isn't - then we might consider why we are allowing people to have to set their own laws in the first place.
It's legal vigilantism, just like war but without the dead soldiers.
Why not see how Muslims would deal with 'their own' under Sharia law
The reason why the viceroy of britian is called 'two tier Keir' is because sharia law follows a similar principle of tiers. Easy on their people and the 'friends of the judge who provides kidnapped british children to those viagra-dependent monsters to rape', and harsh on those they deem their 'slaves'/''property', and the equivalent of being mobbed and executed for those they 'allege' are enemies/opponents of their system.
The accused in the second and third tier of sharia law usually has no legal recourse or the right to defense. The sharia court is judge, jury and sometimes, the executioner.
To answer your question, they would be very nice 'to their own' in a sharia court.
So I reiterate that british law as it is doesn't need to be scrapped - their government needs to be gutted, and the muslim elements permanently torn out and crushed. And the police and government officials who enabled islam's rot to destroy british children must be put to trial in public, and the guilty must be executed in public by electric chair.
And the electric chair is power intensive, think of the grannies who can't run their heating.
No, a rope and in public is enough. For all who are involved in this - regardless of their bank balance or 'friends'.
But transparency is the way to get this done. King's court of Sharia, have it all out in the open and see if the public agrees with the outcome or now.
That, and only that, will set the proper reforms into motion.
But let those who support whatever teams they think are the best team fight it out and get nothing done. They've been at it for decades now and so I don't think they actually want proper justice.
I'm saying give them a chance to show the public what they've got.
If the public like it then there's more room for discussion for it to be considered a feasible solution to Muslim led crimes. If the public don't then there's room for looking into why this can't be given the working service of due process already.
Hint: It's all about who control the law - regardless of whether it is the current set-up or a Sharia one.
The mudslimes and their rape clans have been living off welfare meant for British people and carrying out that vile desecration of British children for well over a decade with the backing of the British government. They deserve no second chances.
The only feasible solution to muslim invasion is retribution. Cold, silent and asymmetrical at first, then over time like an expanding shock wave, targeting their enablers, dealers, lawyers, police contacts and handlers, until their entire system of control collapses into a mass exodus.
Some mudslimes call me 'a jew' for my hatred of muslims, but I don't really care.
I really don't care what football team one side or the other supports.
The law is the law and it is for the benefit of all people.
The law doesn't seem to be working just now, at least not the King's Court law. Why not see how Muslims would deal with 'their own' under Sharia law and then let the public give their thoughts on the matter?
If it is better then we can scrap the King's law for sure. If it isn't - then we might consider why we are allowing people to have to set their own laws in the first place.
It's legal vigilantism, just like war but without the dead soldiers.
The reason why the viceroy of britian is called 'two tier Keir' is because sharia law follows a similar principle of tiers. Easy on their people and the 'friends of the judge who provides kidnapped british children to those viagra-dependent monsters to rape', and harsh on those they deem their 'slaves'/''property', and the equivalent of being mobbed and executed for those they 'allege' are enemies/opponents of their system.
The accused in the second and third tier of sharia law usually has no legal recourse or the right to defense. The sharia court is judge, jury and sometimes, the executioner.
To answer your question, they would be very nice 'to their own' in a sharia court.
So I reiterate that british law as it is doesn't need to be scrapped - their government needs to be gutted, and the muslim elements permanently torn out and crushed. And the police and government officials who enabled islam's rot to destroy british children must be put to trial in public, and the guilty must be executed in public by electric chair.
I've never said British law needs to be scrapped.
And the electric chair is power intensive, think of the grannies who can't run their heating.
No, a rope and in public is enough. For all who are involved in this - regardless of their bank balance or 'friends'.
But transparency is the way to get this done. King's court of Sharia, have it all out in the open and see if the public agrees with the outcome or now.
That, and only that, will set the proper reforms into motion.
But let those who support whatever teams they think are the best team fight it out and get nothing done. They've been at it for decades now and so I don't think they actually want proper justice.