It’s almost like economic tendencies are on constant repeat
(media.kotakuinaction2.win)
Comments (20)
sorted by:
Well there's your actual pay gap.
The jew who made this didnt capitalize White
or Male
Correct. https://i.imgur.com/bSBmIIz.png
There are Similar graphs with lifetime net financial contribution to government
basically only white men pay any taxes (should probably be the only ones who are allowed to vote)
I have seen enough low-impulse-control NPCs forced to disclose their real spending habits to realize they see ''avaliable credit'' and and think it means ''avaliable money to spend''.
And at some point their minimum monthly payments / interests become so large they have to file for bankrupcy, but not before paying alot more in interests than the original debt they took.
A banker's dream come true.
It is amazing following their thought patterns of why they bought something.
''I needed a $900 iPad to take notes for school although I already have a laptop, and pens + paper went extinct or something. Also, we need student loans forgiveness.''
''Something came up so I had to take another credit card.''
Fuck these retards.
"I owe 6 months of rent but my tax refund should definitely go for a new TV. My old TV is a year old and they're doing 25% off!"
My TV is over 10 years old. Why would i buy a new one?
I don't even see how people do that. almost all my expenses are related to survival yet I still have all the material possessions I could want.
Giving credit to 85 avg IQ people should be banned.
While we are at it, interest should be banned, too.
You only needed the first graph.
Nah, there's plenty of fuck ups to go around.
Always helpful to be reminded that there's only like 20% of the population with enough forethought to actually understand what they're voting for and therefore should be allowed to vote.
20%!?
very optimistic, very liberal.
But because things are so hideously skewed by gender at college level, any other graph is irrelevant.
I guess there just must be a much, much, much, higher percentage of black women than Asian or White women, right?
Actually, probably yes. Because of the way the data is based on total balances, the total number of students is totally irrelevant. It's about how much of the total of that specific race is quota backed female entries.
Considering quotas kicked into action in the middle of the measured data, it's likely that the majority of the black cohort was female (double quota), and this likely started being overwhelmingly true around 2015 when the graph abruptly spiked. This would explain why every line on the graph has a deviation upwards around that time. That's when female quotas started to become extremely aggressive, and men withdrew from higher education due to female hostility and malice, creating a self-selecting group of those who wanted to go to college enough that they were willing to risk that.
Only a retard objects to more granular data.
Retard.
Only a retard tries to excuse the burden that women are on society by quoting irrelevant racial stats that are massively skewed by women's failures.