It’s almost like economic tendencies are on constant repeat
(media.kotakuinaction2.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (20)
sorted by:
You only needed the first graph.
Nah, there's plenty of fuck ups to go around.
Always helpful to be reminded that there's only like 20% of the population with enough forethought to actually understand what they're voting for and therefore should be allowed to vote.
20%!?
very optimistic, very liberal.
But because things are so hideously skewed by gender at college level, any other graph is irrelevant.
I guess there just must be a much, much, much, higher percentage of black women than Asian or White women, right?
Actually, probably yes. Because of the way the data is based on total balances, the total number of students is totally irrelevant. It's about how much of the total of that specific race is quota backed female entries.
Considering quotas kicked into action in the middle of the measured data, it's likely that the majority of the black cohort was female (double quota), and this likely started being overwhelmingly true around 2015 when the graph abruptly spiked. This would explain why every line on the graph has a deviation upwards around that time. That's when female quotas started to become extremely aggressive, and men withdrew from higher education due to female hostility and malice, creating a self-selecting group of those who wanted to go to college enough that they were willing to risk that.
Only a retard objects to more granular data.
Retard.
Only a retard tries to excuse the burden that women are on society by quoting irrelevant racial stats that are massively skewed by women's failures.