People find 'proof' Trump was Epstein client
(media.kotakuinaction2.win)
Comments (18)
sorted by:
Well for one thing, the woman involved stated many times, under oath that she never once saw Trump doing anything wrong. Of course she's dead now, so why are the Dems "protecting her identity"? 🤔
And this is GET THIS solely Epstein's word of honor on this. Zero outside support, just an e-mail Epstein sent to someone (not Trump!) and it doesn't even say Trump did anything wrong.
NOW: Prince Andrew is accused (credibly!) of assaulting this underage female in 2001.
Trump said that she, Virginia Giuffre, worked at a spa he owned. So she knew who Trump was (her boss!) and yet said he never did anything wrong. Not to her, not to anyone.
Trump kicked Epstein out in 2004, or perhaps earlier. So yes, "Trump knew" because he'd kicked him out for inappropriate behaviour! Everyone knew!
This is another Pee Pee Gate except even less believable.
Its funny how literally everything they claim Trump might be guilty of regarding Epstein we have confirmation Andrew did, and he has basically been slapped on the wrist over it all.
Its a good litmus test on if someone actually cares about any form of victim or "justice" or are just trying to leverage your morality to get you to attack Trump with them.
The unnamed [VICTIM] Is Virginia Guffriye, who also went on the record as saying that Trump had never done anything inappropriate to her.
But it won't matter. People will believe what they want to believe.
Indeed. That's why Trump's refusal to release the files was so damaging. Everybody wants to believe that the government is completely corrupt (because it is). By doing what he did, it only made him appear to be part of the swamp.
Yeah, it was a terrible own goal, that I'm sure was at least partially if not entirely encouraged by the corrupt Israel-firsters around him.
Good.
Because, at the very least, you now have conservative commentators back to demanding the release of the Epstein files, to "put things in context."
"Epstein who?" went to "Trump's a good boy who dindu nothing, and we need to release the files!"
I don't think Trump is guilty (of this), but he's betrayed us on so much I hope he does feel the pressure, because I think it only leads to good things. Just release everything you have, and let's all have a look at it.
I'm pretty damn frustrated with him myself but I agree. If there was anything incriminating it would have come out when they were throwing everything and the kitchen sink at him to stop his reelection.
Too bad LegalEagle is such a faggot with zero credibility.
What's the "dog that hasn't barked is trump" euphemism all about?
It's a misused reference to a Sherlock Holmes story where Sherlock figures out who stole a prized race horse because the guy who slept near the barn said he didnt hear the dog bark the night the horse was taken, because the dog must have known the person who went in that night. Its used to describe some clue that seems unrelated or pointless that is actually key.
LegalSmeagle seems to think that it refers to a dog who didnt bark because its a bad guard dog or something? Not really sure what this morons point is supposed to be. Its a reference Midwits love because they think it makes them appear well read.
Good. No more BS'ing. Release the files.
If Trump is innocent, great. Release the files and prove it. I can't lie, when I saw this, my first thought was: ah, so this is why they blocked the release.
What files would it satisfy you? They released a bunch already, including this emails.
What do all the other emails say? Does it not bother you that the entire thing just focuses on Trump. Not on any other but the guy who helped put Epstein away?
Dems have been in power for 4 years, the FBI has been a tool of the Democrats for at least 16 years, anything in those files has been already removed.
Mah man. Spot on.
So ... Jeffrey Epstein used gmail to correspond?
I mean, it's not completely uncommon to use a free email service and code words.
Except that billion dollar company is known to read emails, even if just to keyword search to serve ads, so they could potentially be on the hook knowing about it this long and doing nothing about it.
If Trump was guilty in the Epstein files, the Dems would have already released then during the election cycle.
No, it would have leaked back during the first term, when they were spamming impeachment hearings at him.
Most of them are too. They're afraid of getting Mangione'd.
Can we not only get the files released unrelated in full but fire each of the ones that suggested to him NOT to release them?
As I bet we'll get a new AG and chief of staff if we do that..
Zognald is a pedo!