well if they are both just ZOG then it's the same thing.
What if they really aren't mutually exclusive? Meaning they are owned by the same goons up the pyramid hierarchy. By this perspective, saying they aren't mutually exclusive is reasonable.
"Mutually exclusive" in this context doesn't even make sense. It's a false framing.
I can like Lord of the Rings more than the Chronicles of Narnia, but that doesn't mean that I don't care about Chronicles of Narnia. I can care more about my friends and family than my neighbors but that doesn't mean I don't like my neighbors.
To me it speaks of a deep projection on their part that they would somehow view holding one higher than the other that way.
Its probably a smart move to recognize a trap question and just dodge it, unless you are in a specific format where dodging looks worse like a debate. Its just a "have you stopped beating your wife?" setup, regardless on what answer we want them to say.
The ones engaging should be more criticized for how retarded they are for doing so, than the obviously scripted canned responses they give. Someone that stupid shouldn't be in Congress to begin with, but we know how that goes.
How is "have you stopped beating your wife?" a trap? You know how it is, despite the fact that the answer should be simple.
But if you stumble on a single word, it will be pounced on and held against you, heck even entertaining it will be used against you, and anyone with a brain knows that "while I'm walking somewhere a random nobody shoves a camera and mic in my face and is asking me a question regarding a mega clusterfuck" is not going to end well for you no matter how you answer.
I know the answer I believe in with passion, but if someone on the road while I was walking asked me about it I'd be equally dismissive and suspicious of his intent.
By merely asking it is primed, because by asking you reveal your own intent is to use their answer against them. Or I suppose for them, if you trust such a journalist wouldn't just cut any answer that doesn't fit his clickbait.
Someone running up on you while you are walking to film themselves asking you one of the most controversial questions around is not someone who is doing it out of neutrality or journalistic information sharing. Its a set up, one way or another, and should be treated as such.
Every question asked by a journalist is intended to be used against you. And?
And the question isn't remotely controversial at all. They are Americans, their first responsibility and duty and loyalty should be to America. No.other nation, including Israel.
And dismissing them is the right move 100% of the time for that reason. Like I said initially, the guys who humored them at all should be lambasted for being so retarded they did so rather than any answer they gave.
And the question isn't remotely controversial at all.
Except we live in reality where it is, even if we really don't like it, its a dangerous topic to speak off the cuff on. The same way "I am pro-white" has been for a long time, even if obviously any white person should be and many are.
"I don't think they're mutually exclusive"
Then you're a fucking retard.
well if they are both just ZOG then it's the same thing.
What if they really aren't mutually exclusive? Meaning they are owned by the same goons up the pyramid hierarchy. By this perspective, saying they aren't mutually exclusive is reasonable.
"Mutually exclusive" in this context doesn't even make sense. It's a false framing.
I can like Lord of the Rings more than the Chronicles of Narnia, but that doesn't mean that I don't care about Chronicles of Narnia. I can care more about my friends and family than my neighbors but that doesn't mean I don't like my neighbors.
To me it speaks of a deep projection on their part that they would somehow view holding one higher than the other that way.
It's the interests of the "American" government not the people.
They're all either jew pedophiles, blackmailed by jew pedophiles, or sometimes jew pedophiles blackmailing other jew pedophiles.
That last one sounds hot, in there incest involved for more erotic taboo?
You're not funny.
You’re right! You know what’s funny? Feet fetishes! lol!!!!!!!!
The ones that just ignore the question aren't necessarily as bad. They probably ignore every question that some random person asks them.
The ones that actually engage, though, are especially damning.
Its probably a smart move to recognize a trap question and just dodge it, unless you are in a specific format where dodging looks worse like a debate. Its just a "have you stopped beating your wife?" setup, regardless on what answer we want them to say.
The ones engaging should be more criticized for how retarded they are for doing so, than the obviously scripted canned responses they give. Someone that stupid shouldn't be in Congress to begin with, but we know how that goes.
How is “please declare your highest loyalty to America” a trap?
Because they represent Jews.
How is "have you stopped beating your wife?" a trap? You know how it is, despite the fact that the answer should be simple.
But if you stumble on a single word, it will be pounced on and held against you, heck even entertaining it will be used against you, and anyone with a brain knows that "while I'm walking somewhere a random nobody shoves a camera and mic in my face and is asking me a question regarding a mega clusterfuck" is not going to end well for you no matter how you answer.
I know the answer I believe in with passion, but if someone on the road while I was walking asked me about it I'd be equally dismissive and suspicious of his intent.
Those aren't remotely the same. "Have you stopped beating your wife?" Implies you ever started beating your wife.the question is primed.
"Which is more important to you, the US or Israel" isn't primed.
By merely asking it is primed, because by asking you reveal your own intent is to use their answer against them. Or I suppose for them, if you trust such a journalist wouldn't just cut any answer that doesn't fit his clickbait.
Someone running up on you while you are walking to film themselves asking you one of the most controversial questions around is not someone who is doing it out of neutrality or journalistic information sharing. Its a set up, one way or another, and should be treated as such.
Every question asked by a journalist is intended to be used against you. And?
And the question isn't remotely controversial at all. They are Americans, their first responsibility and duty and loyalty should be to America. No.other nation, including Israel.
What the fuck?
And dismissing them is the right move 100% of the time for that reason. Like I said initially, the guys who humored them at all should be lambasted for being so retarded they did so rather than any answer they gave.
Except we live in reality where it is, even if we really don't like it, its a dangerous topic to speak off the cuff on. The same way "I am pro-white" has been for a long time, even if obviously any white person should be and many are.
"As a congressperson my ultimate responsibility is to the people of my constituency."
How hard is that answer?
Their "constituency" might be five thousand miles away from their district.
congressman*
Very hard when you are a zog puppet.
ZOG = Zionist Occupied Government (examples: America, Canada, EU nations)
30 pieces of silver. About USD $7000 in today's money.
That's what is officially declared.
Capitol Hill is Israeli occupied territory.
I imagine there's more to it than the known and reported lobby figures.
There people all need to be voted out, at a minimum.
And hanged for treason
In a just and proper world each and every single one would be tried for treason.
The correct answer is the constituents who voted them into office to represent them.
Treason….high treason Every motherfucker who takes that lobby’s cash needs to be imprisoned for life at the very least
Some sold themselves really cheap. Probably someone in their constituency could have donated the same amount
israel might as well annex us at this point.
Yeah that sounds about right.