By merely asking it is primed, because by asking you reveal your own intent is to use their answer against them. Or I suppose for them, if you trust such a journalist wouldn't just cut any answer that doesn't fit his clickbait.
Someone running up on you while you are walking to film themselves asking you one of the most controversial questions around is not someone who is doing it out of neutrality or journalistic information sharing. Its a set up, one way or another, and should be treated as such.
Every question asked by a journalist is intended to be used against you. And?
And the question isn't remotely controversial at all. They are Americans, their first responsibility and duty and loyalty should be to America. No.other nation, including Israel.
And dismissing them is the right move 100% of the time for that reason. Like I said initially, the guys who humored them at all should be lambasted for being so retarded they did so rather than any answer they gave.
And the question isn't remotely controversial at all.
Except we live in reality where it is, even if we really don't like it, its a dangerous topic to speak off the cuff on. The same way "I am pro-white" has been for a long time, even if obviously any white person should be and many are.
it's dangerous because there's misanthropic satanists who'll hire mercenaries to shoot you if you answer wrong, not because it's objectively a loaded question. the answer to that isn't to "be smart and dodge the question" and just perpetuate the problem, it's to buy a gun and prepare to defend yourself.
this unreasonable reason you're arguing in favor of is largely why we're in this mess to begin with. faced with today's evils the most reasonable thing is to flip the table, so the fact that all politicians don't do that is more damning than any specific detail on what questions they do and don't dodge.
Those aren't remotely the same. "Have you stopped beating your wife?" Implies you ever started beating your wife.the question is primed.
"Which is more important to you, the US or Israel" isn't primed.
By merely asking it is primed, because by asking you reveal your own intent is to use their answer against them. Or I suppose for them, if you trust such a journalist wouldn't just cut any answer that doesn't fit his clickbait.
Someone running up on you while you are walking to film themselves asking you one of the most controversial questions around is not someone who is doing it out of neutrality or journalistic information sharing. Its a set up, one way or another, and should be treated as such.
Every question asked by a journalist is intended to be used against you. And?
And the question isn't remotely controversial at all. They are Americans, their first responsibility and duty and loyalty should be to America. No.other nation, including Israel.
What the fuck?
And dismissing them is the right move 100% of the time for that reason. Like I said initially, the guys who humored them at all should be lambasted for being so retarded they did so rather than any answer they gave.
Except we live in reality where it is, even if we really don't like it, its a dangerous topic to speak off the cuff on. The same way "I am pro-white" has been for a long time, even if obviously any white person should be and many are.
it's dangerous because there's misanthropic satanists who'll hire mercenaries to shoot you if you answer wrong, not because it's objectively a loaded question. the answer to that isn't to "be smart and dodge the question" and just perpetuate the problem, it's to buy a gun and prepare to defend yourself.
this unreasonable reason you're arguing in favor of is largely why we're in this mess to begin with. faced with today's evils the most reasonable thing is to flip the table, so the fact that all politicians don't do that is more damning than any specific detail on what questions they do and don't dodge.