Just in case the west decides to break ties with Israel at some point for all of the evil shit they do to us and everyone else, they will be able to punish their former allies with absolute decimation for forcing them to stand on their own two feet.
Yeah but that would be a "how" question. "Why" is the question as to what goal they achieved by acquiring the ability to nuke any target they want on the globe.
I mean, at this point even I would copy the Samson system - something's got the WEF pushing for Digital ID and 'net zero' and politicians are lining up like well-trained dogs. I'm thinking a massive set of nuclear munitions ready to launch within a minute's notice will serve as enough deterrence.
You don't have to downvote to talk about PROMIS, Ghislaine Maxwell's father, his role in PROMIS to steal nuclear secrets, nor the theft of the materials used to make them a nuclear power.
If isreal wanted to nuke New Zealand they could just put a device in a container and ship it to them. I mean half of isreals nukes could be outside of isreal already.
This is just surface-to-surface capabilities. No reason to think this matters all that much unless you're trying to design countermeasures.
The really scary thing is they don't even need to strike a target directly, indeed it wouldn't be economical to do so. All they need is to detonate in high orbit and the resulting EMP will cover a much vaster area. The resulting chaos will probably kill as many as a direct blast would, through over weeks rather than instantaneously.
Fuck, I was hoping to convince them into using an ICBM on Horseface. No wonder the elites wanted a bunker in new zealand... oh well, onto more standard tactics. Block up their septic tanks with concrete!
NZ will be majority non-Euro by 2030. Their bunkers will disintegrate under the weight of shitty labor (if they can even get through the brown throng while the bombs are falling)
Stupid goy, Israel needs long range nuclear strike capability for regional self defense because the greatest defense is a golem forced to fight in your place.
He's always selling the same war. I don't know why people think he's pushing for different wars. October 7th was a declaration of war from Israel on Iran and all of it's proxies. Considering the shit he said at the time, it seemed like that message was loud and clear.
Israel has ICBMs because they have a space program, and the line between "unmanned launch vehicle" and "ballistic missile" is rather vague. The person you're citing is taking the extreme high end estimate of the missile's range as fact despite it being based on very little data.
Israel has ICBMs because they have a space program, and the line between "unmanned launch vehicle" and "ballistic missile" is rather vague.
Chief that is ridiculous. Australia, Canada, and South Korea have space programs but no intercontinental missiles. You have to design, budget, build, and maintain them. They don't just come free in the space breakfast cereal.
The person you're citing is taking the extreme high end estimate of the missile's range as fact despite it being based on very little data.
There is utterly no point in quibbling whether the range is 4,000 miles or 7,000 miles. Israel's farthest enemy is Iran at about 1,000 miles away. They overbuilt by thousands of miles... because they saw a potential need to hit targets thousands of miles away. They have no business doing that.
Those are some pathetic as shit ICBMs. They should have 100% global coverage. Are they even MIRVs? What the fuck kind of pathetic deterrence is this? If you want to join the MAD club, get proper nukes, not ancient firecrackers.
You are partially correct. They're Long Range Ballistic Missiles. Actual ICBMs can hit any target on the planet since they get up into orbit. They could (in theory) circle the Earth a few times before re-entry.
MIRVs are nice, but just a fancy (cheap and efficient too) way to deliver several small bombs.
Any nuclear-armed nation is technically in the MAD club. In theory: if any nation uses a nuke on any other nation? The offending nation will be destroyed by every other nation, especially by the nuclear armed powers. Probably using nukes, but other ways are possible too.
An ICBM could hit any target on the planet. You're talking about long range ballistic missiles. Russia, China and North Korea are also a threat to Israel, should the first two decide to step in to help their proxy nations. The last one because they're China's nuclear-armed proxy.
One builds a defensive strategy to protect from ANY potential threat. "Oh our missiles only need to go 1,000 miles because no one farther away than that will EVER threaten us!" is idiotic.
There, explained it. You're welcome.
Those are Long Range Ballistic Missiles, eh? ICBMs can orbit the Earth, dropping back anywhere.
ANSWER: Because other nuclear powers could become a threat in the future, or ARE a potential threat now.
Russia, China, Pakistan, North Korea? Some day they may threaten Israel's existence. One needs to prepare today for next year's or next decade's possible conflicts. If China's nukes start falling on Israel, it's a little too late to begin a long range ballistic missile program, eh?
That's because the USA and Israel blew them to fucking Allah.
If Iran got them? Then Saudi and 5+ other Arabic nations would HAVE TO get them as well. In what universe would that be a good idea?
Just like Iraq's nuclear program or Syria's chemical weapons program (which they got from Saddam) it fell to Israel to do the dirty work.
You really understand nothing, eh? Typical.
Saudi Arabia (Sunni) has been in a proxy war with Iran (Shia, need I explain this too?) for decades. Especially since the Mullahs took over. They as much as told Obama that if Iran got a Nuclear weapon, they'd get one too. Yet Obama went ahead and gave Iran permission to pursue Nuclear weapons anyhow, with $6 Billion in cash to get them kick-started. Biden followed up with billions more. Other Arab nations (mostly Sunni) said the same, in response to Iran or in some cases Saudi getting The Bomb.
Why? Because Iran would use their bombs. Their dictatorship fears nothing except Allah.
I got nothing against Arabs, Zoroastrians are a peaceful bunch. Muslims want you and I dead, or on our knees, preferred in that order.
That changes nothing. Islam is clear, their end goal is global domination. EVERY infidel will bend the knee and obey.
Except the Jews, they'll all be killed. It's right there in their holy texts.
Just in case the west decides to break ties with Israel at some point for all of the evil shit they do to us and everyone else, they will be able to punish their former allies with absolute decimation for forcing them to stand on their own two feet.
"God's Chosen" sure do require the goyim to do a lot of their work.
You're saying we are safe in Argentina? And all the nazis that escaped there?
Until Magneto comes for you, yes
Of course the Jew gets the mutant power to manipulate coins.
"Charles, watch this! I can clip the coins and then fold the ridges back into them! I'll be rich!"
Yeah but that would be a "how" question. "Why" is the question as to what goal they achieved by acquiring the ability to nuke any target they want on the globe.
I mean, at this point even I would copy the Samson system - something's got the WEF pushing for Digital ID and 'net zero' and politicians are lining up like well-trained dogs. I'm thinking a massive set of nuclear munitions ready to launch within a minute's notice will serve as enough deterrence.
So far 6 people have downvoted and not a single one has explained why Israel is safer because it can strike targets 7000 miles away.
Muslim countries are all in the same region, guys. Israel never helps its "allies" out militarily, either.
Is this one of the times I wrongly assumed everyone can put two and two together?
You don't have to downvote to talk about PROMIS, Ghislaine Maxwell's father, his role in PROMIS to steal nuclear secrets, nor the theft of the materials used to make them a nuclear power.
Its probably why many elites have escape plans to new zealand.
It's because of other factors.
If isreal wanted to nuke New Zealand they could just put a device in a container and ship it to them. I mean half of isreals nukes could be outside of isreal already.
This is just surface-to-surface capabilities. No reason to think this matters all that much unless you're trying to design countermeasures.
The really scary thing is they don't even need to strike a target directly, indeed it wouldn't be economical to do so. All they need is to detonate in high orbit and the resulting EMP will cover a much vaster area. The resulting chaos will probably kill as many as a direct blast would, through over weeks rather than instantaneously.
Fuck, I was hoping to convince them into using an ICBM on Horseface. No wonder the elites wanted a bunker in new zealand... oh well, onto more standard tactics. Block up their septic tanks with concrete!
NZ will be majority non-Euro by 2030. Their bunkers will disintegrate under the weight of shitty labor (if they can even get through the brown throng while the bombs are falling)
Argentina is protected. Maybe the Führer knew...
First strike threat from Gundams requires strong deterrence measures. Never again.
Stupid goy, Israel needs long range nuclear strike capability for regional self defense because the greatest defense is a golem forced to fight in your place.
He's always selling the same war. I don't know why people think he's pushing for different wars. October 7th was a declaration of war from Israel on Iran and all of it's proxies. Considering the shit he said at the time, it seemed like that message was loud and clear.
There's only one war here.
Iran is 1,000 miles away from Israel. Why does Israel need an extra 3,000-5,000 miles of range?
Don't look at me, and pro-nuclear proliferation.
It could be a waste of money if they don't have a strategic threat from submarines.
Hmm...
Israel has ICBMs because they have a space program, and the line between "unmanned launch vehicle" and "ballistic missile" is rather vague. The person you're citing is taking the extreme high end estimate of the missile's range as fact despite it being based on very little data.
Chief that is ridiculous. Australia, Canada, and South Korea have space programs but no intercontinental missiles. You have to design, budget, build, and maintain them. They don't just come free in the space breakfast cereal.
There is utterly no point in quibbling whether the range is 4,000 miles or 7,000 miles. Israel's farthest enemy is Iran at about 1,000 miles away. They overbuilt by thousands of miles... because they saw a potential need to hit targets thousands of miles away. They have no business doing that.
Those are some pathetic as shit ICBMs. They should have 100% global coverage. Are they even MIRVs? What the fuck kind of pathetic deterrence is this? If you want to join the MAD club, get proper nukes, not ancient firecrackers.
You are partially correct. They're Long Range Ballistic Missiles. Actual ICBMs can hit any target on the planet since they get up into orbit. They could (in theory) circle the Earth a few times before re-entry.
MIRVs are nice, but just a fancy (cheap and efficient too) way to deliver several small bombs.
Any nuclear-armed nation is technically in the MAD club. In theory: if any nation uses a nuke on any other nation? The offending nation will be destroyed by every other nation, especially by the nuclear armed powers. Probably using nukes, but other ways are possible too.
There's a certain point where defending Israel requires more twisted logic, question-begging and downright faulty argumentation than condemning them.
An ICBM could hit any target on the planet. You're talking about long range ballistic missiles. Russia, China and North Korea are also a threat to Israel, should the first two decide to step in to help their proxy nations. The last one because they're China's nuclear-armed proxy.
One builds a defensive strategy to protect from ANY potential threat. "Oh our missiles only need to go 1,000 miles because no one farther away than that will EVER threaten us!" is idiotic.
There, explained it. You're welcome.
You just justified Iran and every other country in the world building long range ballistic missiles. Congrats
With a population of about 8 million and the land mass of New Jersey.....
What retards allowed/gave Israel nuclear weapons?
Me. You. Us.
So go to Argentina then?
Jawohl, che
Those are Long Range Ballistic Missiles, eh? ICBMs can orbit the Earth, dropping back anywhere.
ANSWER: Because other nuclear powers could become a threat in the future, or ARE a potential threat now.
Russia, China, Pakistan, North Korea? Some day they may threaten Israel's existence. One needs to prepare today for next year's or next decade's possible conflicts. If China's nukes start falling on Israel, it's a little too late to begin a long range ballistic missile program, eh?
You guys are furious about Israel having atomic weapons, but not Iran?
Reality check: which nation demands its citizens chant "Death To America" regularly? You guys are "the Big Satan" eh?
Iran doesn't even have atomic weapons
That's because the USA and Israel blew them to fucking Allah.
If Iran got them? Then Saudi and 5+ other Arabic nations would HAVE TO get them as well. In what universe would that be a good idea?
Just like Iraq's nuclear program or Syria's chemical weapons program (which they got from Saddam) it fell to Israel to do the dirty work.
I don't know. What do you have against Arabs?
You really understand nothing, eh? Typical.
Saudi Arabia (Sunni) has been in a proxy war with Iran (Shia, need I explain this too?) for decades. Especially since the Mullahs took over. They as much as told Obama that if Iran got a Nuclear weapon, they'd get one too. Yet Obama went ahead and gave Iran permission to pursue Nuclear weapons anyhow, with $6 Billion in cash to get them kick-started. Biden followed up with billions more. Other Arab nations (mostly Sunni) said the same, in response to Iran or in some cases Saudi getting The Bomb.
Why? Because Iran would use their bombs. Their dictatorship fears nothing except Allah.
I got nothing against Arabs, Zoroastrians are a peaceful bunch. Muslims want you and I dead, or on our knees, preferred in that order.
You know that Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Egypt, etc are our allies right?
That changes nothing. Islam is clear, their end goal is global domination. EVERY infidel will bend the knee and obey.
Except the Jews, they'll all be killed. It's right there in their holy texts.
If you think the holy texts matter so much then you know the Jewish texts say that Gentiles will serve the Jews, right?