There's a lot of conspiracy hunting at the moment. The shooters tranny lover is co-operating with police, the recordings we have of the shooter shows he was by himself, he used an cheap bolt-action hunting rifle. I don't know that there's a bunch of people who knew that this happened.
I don't mind the FBI interrogating them to be sure, but I'm not convinced that a lot of people knew this was going to happen.
Wasn't an old guy drawing aggro so the shooter could get away? If there wasn't a conspiracy, it's only because you're in a Niihau incident scenario where you can recruit accomplices on the fly as easily as finding day workers at a Home Depot car park.
There was another local guy who did a TV spot where he explained that the old guy who immediately took credit was a well known local nutjob. It's not impossible that he was in on the group chat but it's more likely he wasn't connected. The guy who was carrying the pellet gun was definitely an intentional decoy though.
... I assure you the the empty case that was still chambered in the rifle that was dropped abandoned in the woods is a pretty good bit of evidence to tell us what gun was used.
It is within the realm of physical possibilities, as would Charlie Kirk being killed by a rouge micro-meteorite, but why would that be more likely than the current hypothesis?
It's like saying you don't know what gun was used when you have the car, the gun, and the casing in the vehicle.
How can they not have recovered it? Unless someone took it? That should be on video, I'd think? Lots of cameras there.
The trajectory is well defined, there's a very limited area it could have ended up.
Some have said there was no exit wound? I don't see how that's possible either, unless it was lodged in his bones somewhere. In which case it would be recovered by now.
There's a lot of conspiracy hunting at the moment. The shooters tranny lover is co-operating with police, the recordings we have of the shooter shows he was by himself, he used an cheap bolt-action hunting rifle. I don't know that there's a bunch of people who knew that this happened.
I don't mind the FBI interrogating them to be sure, but I'm not convinced that a lot of people knew this was going to happen.
Unfortunately I would not trust the FBI to tell me these people honestly had no connection to the shooting.
I trust the FBI to tell me that they don't have a connection when they do in fact have a connection to the shooting.
Wasn't an old guy drawing aggro so the shooter could get away? If there wasn't a conspiracy, it's only because you're in a Niihau incident scenario where you can recruit accomplices on the fly as easily as finding day workers at a Home Depot car park.
There was another local guy who did a TV spot where he explained that the old guy who immediately took credit was a well known local nutjob. It's not impossible that he was in on the group chat but it's more likely he wasn't connected. The guy who was carrying the pellet gun was definitely an intentional decoy though.
We don't know yet why he did what he did. I agree that could be random unknowing accomplices "Battle of Algiers" style.
Co-operating with Police generally means to save your own skin.
HOPEFULLY the FBI are actually going to arrest those responsible and there's be a non soros DA to prosecute.
yeah, why would they believe a single word of someone who made lying to himself a way of life.
The bullet wasn't recovered so we don't know what gun was used
... I assure you the the empty case that was still chambered in the rifle that was dropped abandoned in the woods is a pretty good bit of evidence to tell us what gun was used.
Couldn't anyone have fired it (off-site), left it chambered and planted it there?
It is within the realm of physical possibilities, as would Charlie Kirk being killed by a rouge micro-meteorite, but why would that be more likely than the current hypothesis?
It's like saying you don't know what gun was used when you have the car, the gun, and the casing in the vehicle.
How can they not have recovered it? Unless someone took it? That should be on video, I'd think? Lots of cameras there.
The trajectory is well defined, there's a very limited area it could have ended up.
Some have said there was no exit wound? I don't see how that's possible either, unless it was lodged in his bones somewhere. In which case it would be recovered by now.
All excellent questions. The law response to this has been a joke.
Probably to try to make a deal and not get the firing squad
I'm not convinced they're in on it yet. They might be, but IDK.