... I assure you the the empty case that was still chambered in the rifle that was dropped abandoned in the woods is a pretty good bit of evidence to tell us what gun was used.
It is within the realm of physical possibilities, as would Charlie Kirk being killed by a rouge micro-meteorite, but why would that be more likely than the current hypothesis?
It's like saying you don't know what gun was used when you have the car, the gun, and the casing in the vehicle.
How can they not have recovered it? Unless someone took it? That should be on video, I'd think? Lots of cameras there.
The trajectory is well defined, there's a very limited area it could have ended up.
Some have said there was no exit wound? I don't see how that's possible either, unless it was lodged in his bones somewhere. In which case it would be recovered by now.
The bullet wasn't recovered so we don't know what gun was used
... I assure you the the empty case that was still chambered in the rifle that was dropped abandoned in the woods is a pretty good bit of evidence to tell us what gun was used.
Couldn't anyone have fired it (off-site), left it chambered and planted it there?
It is within the realm of physical possibilities, as would Charlie Kirk being killed by a rouge micro-meteorite, but why would that be more likely than the current hypothesis?
It's like saying you don't know what gun was used when you have the car, the gun, and the casing in the vehicle.
How can they not have recovered it? Unless someone took it? That should be on video, I'd think? Lots of cameras there.
The trajectory is well defined, there's a very limited area it could have ended up.
Some have said there was no exit wound? I don't see how that's possible either, unless it was lodged in his bones somewhere. In which case it would be recovered by now.
All excellent questions. The law response to this has been a joke.