They did it for the Gifford assassin, even though he was a card-carrying Democrat who'd volunteered for her campaigns in the past.
They did it for the Boston Bombing, saying some lefty office was "nearby".
They get the mantra out early & often, facts don't matter to their loyal followers.
I'm sitll going to say it's possible that the messages could still be a deflection by the shooter, but I would say this is a check in the box for: psycho leftist killing
Also, if he got hit with a 30-06 from a Mosin at 200 yards, he didn't make it to the hospital alive. The damage to his spine would have been non-survivable. The stuff about him fighting for his life at the hospital was probably just miscommunication. I'm sure the medical staff were fighting hard to make it work, but there's only so much you can do.
Also, note that the "gun violence" narrative isn't going to work on a bolt-gun developed in 1891. It is "technically" a "weapon of war".
possible that the messages could still be a deflection by the shooter
Doesn't matter. If he says he's trans then he is - that's trans-ideology's own rubric and they must be held to it.
Even if it turns out the shooter was far right and purposely did it to frame trans ideology just keep including him in the list of trans violence and calling him a trans shooter. Make them have to say out loud, "well ackshually just because somebody says they're trans doesn't mean they are". They won't see the hypocrisy, but others will.
It was not a Mosin Nagant. It was a Mauser. It's now owned by SIG Sauer, and they make basic sporter hunting rifles, it's not really the same thing as an antique Mauser with wood furniture.
It kind of sounds like it may just simply be a modern M03 or M18 model Mauser chambered in .30-06 with a cheap plastic stock. A modern off the shelf hunting rifle in $400-700 price point range. Not much different than a Ruger American, Savage 110, or Tikka t3x. It seems like kind of an oddball choice that might not be widely available or popular in the US. Edit I can only find a few Mauser dealers online. Palmetto doesn't carry them. Eurooptic has them in stock for $670. It doesn't seem to me very common. I just find that really odd.
If it were an antique Mauser, like an M98 or Kar98k, then it would have been chambered in some oddball European cartridge where one might not be able to find reliable surplus ammunition to feed it. An antique Mauser wouldn't be chambered in .30-06, unless it had been rechambered or "sporterized" (modified for hunting).
You are absolutely correct, I misread that as Mosin. Mea Culpa. It is indeed claimed as a Mauser.
However, as you pointed a .30-06 Mauser is actually super weird. The old Mausers are 8mm-Mauser (7.92x57mm) That's the "odd ball" cartridge, but those are actually easy to find because basically every early 20th century Mauser was in 8mm. As you pointed out, a modernized .30-06 Mauser is not at all common.
I think the ATF may simply be wrong about this because they might not understand what they are looking at yet until they hand it to a gunsmith. We've seen the low competence of ATF officials already.
But, like I said, you're 100% spot-on and this is a super important comment that I haven't seen anyone bring up. An old gun buddy of mine mentioned it and that's when I realized "wait... Mauser's are 8mm? dafuq?"
I'm always a little bit sceptical on early reporting. But having said that...
...goddamn am I going to be hearing alot of 2a-absolutionist cucks bleating for the next several months about this shit. There was already talk about banning guns for trannies that had them falling all overthemselves virtue signaling, and now they'llprobably get even worse.
Man, I had a meme where a tacticool guy is getting strangled by a black/tranny/antifa while mumbling 'But I fought for your rights' or some shit, but I can't find the damn thing. Pity, it would be perfect right about now.
Exactly. Anyone who can't be trusted with a gun, simply can't be trusted in public. Time for some tranny control laws to get all those trannies off the streets.
Yes, disarming ourselves would surely be the best solution to our political enemies using guns to kill us. Surely they will see our actions as an olive branch and not as an invitation to ramp it up even further once we can't fight back. And if they don't, the government will always be there to step in and protect us, any day now.
I had a meme with Steve Buscemi saying "hello fellow white people" or some shit but I can't find it. Pity, it would be perfect right now.
My issue is that 2a absolutionists are naive and delusional. They operate on the idea that if they can somehow reach across the aisle and find common cause via supporting other people's gun-ownership rights, that they'll become bosom companions and everything will be merry.
No. Sorry. Doesn't work that way. I'm not going to expend energy trying to arm my enemy that wants to kill me.
I'm beginning to think I really didn't make myself clear in what I was trying to say...
Your confusion comes from misreading the motives of gun rights supporters. We aren't "reaching across the aisle" by defending their gun rights. By defending their rights, we are defending our own. We aren't trying to arm them. We are keeping the government from eventually disarming us.
It's no different than free speech "absolutionists" defending speech they find offensive. If there are "reasonable" limits, then they are no longer rights, but privileges. And privileges can be further eroded or taken away completely.
The truth is that the media will say he was right-wing. They did it for Trump's assassin and the assassin of those 2 Massachusetts law makers.
It didn't matter how ridiculous it sounded you can still see them posting how they were MAGA, somehow.
Time to start arresting them for terrorist support.
They did it for the Gifford assassin, even though he was a card-carrying Democrat who'd volunteered for her campaigns in the past.
They did it for the Boston Bombing, saying some lefty office was "nearby".
They get the mantra out early & often, facts don't matter to their loyal followers.
Charlie Kirk didn't kill himself.
It's not per WSJ, it's per Steven Crowder. Good fucking job, Mugclub.
https://xcancel.com/scrowder/status/1966118431511433267#m
I'm sitll going to say it's possible that the messages could still be a deflection by the shooter, but I would say this is a check in the box for: psycho leftist killing
Also, if he got hit with a 30-06 from a Mosin at 200 yards, he didn't make it to the hospital alive. The damage to his spine would have been non-survivable. The stuff about him fighting for his life at the hospital was probably just miscommunication. I'm sure the medical staff were fighting hard to make it work, but there's only so much you can do.
Also, note that the "gun violence" narrative isn't going to work on a bolt-gun developed in 1891. It is "technically" a "weapon of war".
Doesn't matter. If he says he's trans then he is - that's trans-ideology's own rubric and they must be held to it.
Even if it turns out the shooter was far right and purposely did it to frame trans ideology just keep including him in the list of trans violence and calling him a trans shooter. Make them have to say out loud, "well ackshually just because somebody says they're trans doesn't mean they are". They won't see the hypocrisy, but others will.
It was not a Mosin Nagant. It was a Mauser. It's now owned by SIG Sauer, and they make basic sporter hunting rifles, it's not really the same thing as an antique Mauser with wood furniture.
It kind of sounds like it may just simply be a modern M03 or M18 model Mauser chambered in .30-06 with a cheap plastic stock. A modern off the shelf hunting rifle in $400-700 price point range. Not much different than a Ruger American, Savage 110, or Tikka t3x. It seems like kind of an oddball choice that might not be widely available or popular in the US. Edit I can only find a few Mauser dealers online. Palmetto doesn't carry them. Eurooptic has them in stock for $670. It doesn't seem to me very common. I just find that really odd.
If it were an antique Mauser, like an M98 or Kar98k, then it would have been chambered in some oddball European cartridge where one might not be able to find reliable surplus ammunition to feed it. An antique Mauser wouldn't be chambered in .30-06, unless it had been rechambered or "sporterized" (modified for hunting).
You are absolutely correct, I misread that as Mosin. Mea Culpa. It is indeed claimed as a Mauser.
However, as you pointed a .30-06 Mauser is actually super weird. The old Mausers are 8mm-Mauser (7.92x57mm) That's the "odd ball" cartridge, but those are actually easy to find because basically every early 20th century Mauser was in 8mm. As you pointed out, a modernized .30-06 Mauser is not at all common.
I think the ATF may simply be wrong about this because they might not understand what they are looking at yet until they hand it to a gunsmith. We've seen the low competence of ATF officials already.
But, like I said, you're 100% spot-on and this is a super important comment that I haven't seen anyone bring up. An old gun buddy of mine mentioned it and that's when I realized "wait... Mauser's are 8mm? dafuq?"
It's likely to be another "alphabet person" doing the shooting, yet again.
The only question is which alphabet agency, and what kind of mentally ill.
I'm always a little bit sceptical on early reporting. But having said that...
...goddamn am I going to be hearing alot of 2a-absolutionist cucks bleating for the next several months about this shit. There was already talk about banning guns for trannies that had them falling all overthemselves virtue signaling, and now they'llprobably get even worse.
Man, I had a meme where a tacticool guy is getting strangled by a black/tranny/antifa while mumbling 'But I fought for your rights' or some shit, but I can't find the damn thing. Pity, it would be perfect right about now.
What we need is common sense tranny control
Exactly. Anyone who can't be trusted with a gun, simply can't be trusted in public. Time for some tranny control laws to get all those trannies off the streets.
Yes, disarming ourselves would surely be the best solution to our political enemies using guns to kill us. Surely they will see our actions as an olive branch and not as an invitation to ramp it up even further once we can't fight back. And if they don't, the government will always be there to step in and protect us, any day now.
I had a meme with Steve Buscemi saying "hello fellow white people" or some shit but I can't find it. Pity, it would be perfect right now.
...? I'm sorry, what?
My issue is that 2a absolutionists are naive and delusional. They operate on the idea that if they can somehow reach across the aisle and find common cause via supporting other people's gun-ownership rights, that they'll become bosom companions and everything will be merry.
No. Sorry. Doesn't work that way. I'm not going to expend energy trying to arm my enemy that wants to kill me.
I'm beginning to think I really didn't make myself clear in what I was trying to say...
Did you know that Fascism, Racism, and Counter-revolutionary thought were all considered mental illnesses in the Soviet Union?
That's why going down that rabbit hole is a silly idea.
The same people who banned the asylums are also the people who want to kill you. They are also the ones writing the DSM.
True.
It's still far to close to a scorpion-and-frog scenario for my taste.
If we both have guns, I have a chance.
If only criminals who are acquitted and released 14 times have guns, I don't.
Your confusion comes from misreading the motives of gun rights supporters. We aren't "reaching across the aisle" by defending their gun rights. By defending their rights, we are defending our own. We aren't trying to arm them. We are keeping the government from eventually disarming us.
It's no different than free speech "absolutionists" defending speech they find offensive. If there are "reasonable" limits, then they are no longer rights, but privileges. And privileges can be further eroded or taken away completely.
Yeah a badass sniper tranny that knew how to make a getaway /s
Chris Beck is a retired SEAL who became a tranny. It is entirely possible a mentally ill but competent tranny could pull this off.
We have plenty of videos of trannies arming up and hitting the gun range. What are the odds that literally none of them are becoming good shots?
With no security and a bunch of retards around? It isn't hard.
You're probably one of the retards thinking it was the jews though.
Not just retards but also complicit leftists. They would reflexively aid and abet a fellow lefty assassin.
Nah he'd break an ankle in his high heels if it was a tranny