Ammo had tranny and "anti fascist" stuff on it, per wsj
Trump, do something about the tranny problem in this country.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (26)
sorted by:
Yes, disarming ourselves would surely be the best solution to our political enemies using guns to kill us. Surely they will see our actions as an olive branch and not as an invitation to ramp it up even further once we can't fight back. And if they don't, the government will always be there to step in and protect us, any day now.
I had a meme with Steve Buscemi saying "hello fellow white people" or some shit but I can't find it. Pity, it would be perfect right now.
...? I'm sorry, what?
My issue is that 2a absolutionists are naive and delusional. They operate on the idea that if they can somehow reach across the aisle and find common cause via supporting other people's gun-ownership rights, that they'll become bosom companions and everything will be merry.
No. Sorry. Doesn't work that way. I'm not going to expend energy trying to arm my enemy that wants to kill me.
I'm beginning to think I really didn't make myself clear in what I was trying to say...
Did you know that Fascism, Racism, and Counter-revolutionary thought were all considered mental illnesses in the Soviet Union?
That's why going down that rabbit hole is a silly idea.
The same people who banned the asylums are also the people who want to kill you. They are also the ones writing the DSM.
True.
It's still far to close to a scorpion-and-frog scenario for my taste.
If we both have guns, I have a chance.
If only criminals who are acquitted and released 14 times have guns, I don't.
Your confusion comes from misreading the motives of gun rights supporters. We aren't "reaching across the aisle" by defending their gun rights. By defending their rights, we are defending our own. We aren't trying to arm them. We are keeping the government from eventually disarming us.
It's no different than free speech "absolutionists" defending speech they find offensive. If there are "reasonable" limits, then they are no longer rights, but privileges. And privileges can be further eroded or taken away completely.