They always stop at 'the right wants to ban books'
But ... did these quick to censor you but don't care when they do it human boogers even bother to read the smut? I mean, we've been banning books from certain readers for decades, longer than I've been alive.
Sometimes just giving toddlers pornography can be, y'know, not only bad, but think about it for about 5 seconds... Did you think it might be fucked up?
Much better than: christians are going to rise up and create a fascist theocracy because they're fascists and meanies and some rich guy will make me part of his harem and force me to have children because... Uh, nuclear war or something
This is pretty common with Leftist institutions: malicious compliance.
IIRC, the DOD was doing something similar until they found and removed the guy giving guidance.
It's the level of pettiness that these bureaucrats operate at. "Oh, I'm not allowed to show dudes getting face fucked to elementary school students. Welp, guess I'll have to remove anything with the letters g-a-y in any sequence in all media. First, I'll start with The Flinstones, because it has lyrics in the intro about a 'gay old time'."
Margaret Atwood is pretty much the only Canadian author anyone knows because she wrote a whole bunch of apocalyptic, dystopian & feminist literature.
But she's also like 90 years old and predictably delulu and out-of-touch.
She wrote Oryx & Crake which was a apocalyptic fiction novel about the last living human called Snowman wandering the Earth after consumerism & genetic engineering runs amok. I remember liking it a long time ago, but would fear re-reading it again to see how subversive it probably was.
Yes, one should get angry at the teachers & librarians.
They were told to get p0rn out of the hands of little kids. Specifically 4 books that they love to promote the Alphabet Soup with. Groomer books filled with explicit child p0rnography. Both text and images.
But the "rules" can't name specific books, so the "guidelines" basically covered their content with zero wiggle room, they had to go!
SO! The unions (who HATE the Conservative Premier) found 200 more popular books "with sex in them" and banned those too. They "leaked" the lists before they were approved. The list is not what the government wants banned, it's what the union is gaslighting us with.
Called "Washington Monument Syndrome" it happens a LOT when dealing with unions and entrenched bureaucracies. Cut the critically important to save the fat-cats.
But, based on this post, you might just need a little reminder because either you didn’t read the Ministers public directive to the school boards in Alberta, or you’ve forgotten what it actually says.
The real answer is she thinks they're all stupid gullible babies who she can easily lie to. You can always count on a lefty feminist to project their worst intentions out into the open for you
Of course all the Media in Canada, lead by the CBC (Liberal Party House Organ) and joined by most of the rest, LIE about it!
The Province of Alberta issued guidelines to get rid of child p0rn from school libraries. They couldn't name the 4 books targeted, so they wrote exacting rules to include them with no wiggle room. It's the 4 most common groomer books the alphabet people use to indoctrinate kids with. They contain explicit child p0rn, both text and images.
The teacher and librarian unions WANT those books in the hands of kids as young as 6. So the made up a list including 200 popular books "that have sex in them" and "leaked" this unofficial list to the eager lapdog Media.
The Media dutifully claimed the Province wanted them banned, but that's a barefaced lie. It's the unions trying to use "Washington Monument Syndrome" to "maliciously comply" with the rules in order to overturn them.
They always stop at 'the right wants to ban books'
But ... did these quick to censor you but don't care when they do it human boogers even bother to read the smut? I mean, we've been banning books from certain readers for decades, longer than I've been alive.
Sometimes just giving toddlers pornography can be, y'know, not only bad, but think about it for about 5 seconds... Did you think it might be fucked up?
Because it is.
To the left it's the point of giving it to them, so no, they see nothing wrong with it.
Ah yes, banning the (rape?) fetish book, thank you.
Much better than: christians are going to rise up and create a fascist theocracy because they're fascists and meanies and some rich guy will make me part of his harem and force me to have children because... Uh, nuclear war or something
This is pretty common with Leftist institutions: malicious compliance.
IIRC, the DOD was doing something similar until they found and removed the guy giving guidance.
It's the level of pettiness that these bureaucrats operate at. "Oh, I'm not allowed to show dudes getting face fucked to elementary school students. Welp, guess I'll have to remove anything with the letters g-a-y in any sequence in all media. First, I'll start with The Flinstones, because it has lyrics in the intro about a 'gay old time'."
Dunno who is this cunt, but if there is anything worse than an American libtarded woman, is a Canadian one.
She wrote Handmaid's Tale, the Trump hating women's porn.
"The thing that I say I never want to see happen in my life, yet I keep dressing up and cosplaying as it, and claiming it's always happening."
Margaret Atwood is pretty much the only Canadian author anyone knows because she wrote a whole bunch of apocalyptic, dystopian & feminist literature.
But she's also like 90 years old and predictably delulu and out-of-touch.
She wrote Oryx & Crake which was a apocalyptic fiction novel about the last living human called Snowman wandering the Earth after consumerism & genetic engineering runs amok. I remember liking it a long time ago, but would fear re-reading it again to see how subversive it probably was.
Am I supposed to be mad about their response? Banning leftist fantasy books is backlash?
Yes, one should get angry at the teachers & librarians.
They were told to get p0rn out of the hands of little kids. Specifically 4 books that they love to promote the Alphabet Soup with. Groomer books filled with explicit child p0rnography. Both text and images.
But the "rules" can't name specific books, so the "guidelines" basically covered their content with zero wiggle room, they had to go!
SO! The unions (who HATE the Conservative Premier) found 200 more popular books "with sex in them" and banned those too. They "leaked" the lists before they were approved. The list is not what the government wants banned, it's what the union is gaslighting us with.
Called "Washington Monument Syndrome" it happens a LOT when dealing with unions and entrenched bureaucracies. Cut the critically important to save the fat-cats.
I think it's strange that Margaret always take off the burka for pictures for the CBC.
The real answer is she thinks they're all stupid gullible babies who she can easily lie to. You can always count on a lefty feminist to project their worst intentions out into the open for you
Of course all the Media in Canada, lead by the CBC (Liberal Party House Organ) and joined by most of the rest, LIE about it!
The Province of Alberta issued guidelines to get rid of child p0rn from school libraries. They couldn't name the 4 books targeted, so they wrote exacting rules to include them with no wiggle room. It's the 4 most common groomer books the alphabet people use to indoctrinate kids with. They contain explicit child p0rn, both text and images.
The teacher and librarian unions WANT those books in the hands of kids as young as 6. So the made up a list including 200 popular books "that have sex in them" and "leaked" this unofficial list to the eager lapdog Media.
The Media dutifully claimed the Province wanted them banned, but that's a barefaced lie. It's the unions trying to use "Washington Monument Syndrome" to "maliciously comply" with the rules in order to overturn them.