Not too long before they start banning soap commercials entirely. Because promoting actually washing your hands is euronormative or whatever the new fag term is for anti white hatred.
The two is just a pretense, I'm sure there have been adverts pushing gay-troon shit on kids that have garnered thousands of complaints that the ASA have let slide.
The circus part is how the Brits seem to take those incredibly flimsy excuses that the government has to ban what they want banned at face value.
That could be interpreted as suggesting that white skin was superior to black skin,” it added, while acknowledging that “we understood that this message was not the one intended and might appear coincidental or pass unnoticed by some viewers
This is how you speak to scold a child. They think you are children.
The vision of a Black person covered with white mud, then "getting clean" and being Black again? I'm pretty sure "those people" would still be offended.
Well, as far north as the UK, white skin is objectivy superior. Their (also most of, "my") ancestors began darker, then some adapted with light skin, probably survived plagues and harsh winters better, and here we are.
I mean, sure, you could make arguments specific out the obvious intent of the ad, which does appear to be at all racist. But, if the problem is that a few people think it may imply something that is patently true, just roll with that.
Not too long before they start banning soap commercials entirely. Because promoting actually washing your hands is euronormative or whatever the new fag term is for anti white hatred.
A community makes an entire thing out of being ashy as an identity touchstone, then turns around and bitches when they get shown being ashy.
The two is just a pretense, I'm sure there have been adverts pushing gay-troon shit on kids that have garnered thousands of complaints that the ASA have let slide.
The circus part is how the Brits seem to take those incredibly flimsy excuses that the government has to ban what they want banned at face value.
Or is it, here me out, because it's easier to demonstrate a CLEANING PRODUCT on White skin?
And tattoos.
This is how you speak to scold a child. They think you are children.
The uk is cucked
So it's controversial to show black skin followed by White skin in an ad.
Solution: Don’t show black skin in ads. It might offend somebody.
Low expectations strike again!
Well, it is.
But… it is.
Switch the races and it's empowering and DEI approved. As long as you're shitting on white people, it's fine.
The vision of a Black person covered with white mud, then "getting clean" and being Black again? I'm pretty sure "those people" would still be offended.
In other words: good looking White people are illegal on TV now.
My normie mother who has not been watching much TV over the past 5 years, after watching TV an afternoon :
Removing dirt from your skin is racist.
It's actually promoting showering to Indians, which they took as racism.
Next story
''Illegal alien who was illegally hired as a police officer leaves after ICE arrested him'' would be the honest headline.
You don't hate journalists enough.
Well, as far north as the UK, white skin is objectivy superior. Their (also most of, "my") ancestors began darker, then some adapted with light skin, probably survived plagues and harsh winters better, and here we are.
I mean, sure, you could make arguments specific out the obvious intent of the ad, which does appear to be at all racist. But, if the problem is that a few people think it may imply something that is patently true, just roll with that.
at this latitude? it is.
Direct link to CNN??
Archive link: https://archive.is/7jLKD