Black women commit more murders per capita than white men in the US. Female violence rates are actually estimated to be nearly 1:1 with men if not higher, they just rarely get charged for physical assault. Females commit the majority of domestic violence based on every study done on the topic, they just don’t face legal repercussions for it. Females also kill their own children (abortion) at rates so astronomical that you would have to double every death by war, homicide, and suicide throughout the entire history of the US just to compete with abortion after Roe (52 years).
It's why the domestic violence rate goes up as the number of women in the relationshit goes up. I bet that would hold true for polytards as well, but there's no way academia would touch the topic.
Black women commit more murders per capita than white men in the US
I'd like to see that data because I don't believe it.
I also don't agree with the 1:1 on violence rates, and domestic violence rates.
To be honest, a swathe of male on male violence goes unreported as well because some amount of interpersonal violence among men is tolerated by all involved parties.
I'd like to see that data because I don't believe it.
Then read NIBRS
White men 3.5 per 100k, black women 5.8 per 100k.
I also don't agree with the 1:1 on violence rates, and domestic violence rates.
I don’t care about your feelings faggot. Every study show women dominate domestic violence rates. Every study also say female on male violence is the most underreported crime state by occurrence.
To be honest, a swathe of male on male violence goes unreported as well because some amount of interpersonal violence among men is tolerated by all involved parties.
“But guys fighting is the same as women dominating unreciprocated domestic violence by 70%” again mealy mouthed faggotry.
Thank you for that. (I have no idea why we had to go through all of that)
From Data Hazard's own tweet, which only goes to 2005, the period between 1980 and 2005 is when black women have a lower per capita murder rate for the below 25 age groups, though the +25 are fairly similar.
The other post he included doesn't include females at all.
I looked through the FBI's Crime Data Explorer which used NIBRS, and it doesn't allow for a break-down by sex and race of offender. I'm not going to spend the time right now downloading the master file as an ASCII file and importing it into Excel or Power BI to sort through it if I don't have to.
From what you're showing me, it's that the murder rates of white men and black women appear to be similar, but also seem like the the white men are still higher than black women, and I'm not seeing anything that disputes that. What Datahazard said specifically:
Until 1984, Black Females commit homicide at a higher rate than White Males (including Hispanic Males) every year.
That part seems to be true, but I'm not convinced that that is true in 2022 or 2025.
Why do you believe I should avoid skepticism on a topic where men are physically larger, more aggressive, and are genetically & neurologically prone to be more violent in all cases contrasting with women. Why do sex differences, including different organs, magically disappear when you sub-select by race?
Mutual combat is not usually classified as criminal violence. Two guys punching each other outside a bar, with nothing more than a bloody nose as a result? Not the same as a skank (of any race) knifing her date then accusing him of violence.
"He disrespected me!"
"That's no reason to knife him in the back, Miss."
"He said he'd punch me!"
"Get him in cuffs & take him downtown!"
Mutual combat is actually illegal in most states. Most states don't have laws excluding it. As far as I know, just Washington and Texas. It's just that if it is mutual combat, and neither side co-operates with the police, there's not going to be a charge for it since they don't want to involve the cops, and the prosecutors won't care.
Right! I said in another comment that the rate is 3X for "migrants" in Europe. That's true, but for those offspring of "migrants" the rate is also huge, and they get counted as "Native Britons" (or whatever) and hugely inflate those numbers. "Ethnics" being 10X or 20X more than Whites seems highly likely for the general population. Again this is despite being a small % of the overall population.
The native European men and women were able to coexist peacefully for years yet somehow the rape and sexual assault issue only became a problem when the borders were opened.
God Dam, you know the twats who say this were the idiots falling asleep in the back of history class.
I dont know what the fuck humanity's been up to for the last 100,000 years, but for the last 5,000 I think historians have a pretty good clue.
If they werent killing each other from invading tribes, it was being picked off by beasts that do not exists today.
Its that toxicity that gives us the right to be here, like holy shit. We really deserve to be invaded by fucking china or russia.
Really dumb if someone believes you can wipe out thousands of years of evolutionary baggage in a generation or two.
Literal fucking monkeys stumbling out of the cave and somehow we got computers, nuclear weapons, ai, etc. Its kinda amazing we havent wiped ourselves out yet.
Hundreds of thousands of years, if not 1 million.
Not "1 million years ago" either: for the past 1 million years up to (maybe) 3,000 years ago. A big difference, eh?
We haven't wiped each other out yet because genetic selection also favoured those who were more "tribal" & "law abiding" than homicidal maniacs... mostly. Guys who could control their rage did better than those who were constantly angry... mostly. :/
Fun fact, migrant women are as likely to commit crimes as German men which has been found out based on statistics recently. Even with the "men are more likely to commit crimes" it's crazy to see, yet not surprising. Brown people are the issue, not just the men.
All they care about is getting the government to kill their babies for free.
That's "liberation" for women
When conquistadors showed up the Mayans were slaughtering babies at altars before their temples. Matriarchies seem to often lead to infanticide and prostitution
They'd (Aztecs & Mayans) would actually breed their own children to BE sacrifices.
It's like modern "feminists" getting pregnant just so they can have (another) abortion. It's kindermörder. 🙁 & that's a hallmark of matriarchies, a fine observation!
Literally 3X as likely to be raped by a "migrant" even though they're a small % of the population.
All across Europe, for a decade or more now. The more "migrants" they have? The higher the rape rates go. It's a rock-solid correlation.
How the fuck is anti-woman? There is no way to completely stop all violent crime if humans with system of law exist. Is "men will get murdered anyway" inherently anti-man?
Yes "men will get murdered anyway" is anti-man, especially when we are talking about immigrants targeting said group.
It is a dismissal of the horrific consequences of a government policy to import rapists.
If a government official announced that 10 men were gang raped by a horde of illegals, but it was nothing to worry about because "men will get raped anyway", I would say the same thing and that it demonstrates misandric anti-male tendencies among the government.
Black women commit more murders per capita than white men in the US. Female violence rates are actually estimated to be nearly 1:1 with men if not higher, they just rarely get charged for physical assault. Females commit the majority of domestic violence based on every study done on the topic, they just don’t face legal repercussions for it. Females also kill their own children (abortion) at rates so astronomical that you would have to double every death by war, homicide, and suicide throughout the entire history of the US just to compete with abortion after Roe (52 years).
It's why the domestic violence rate goes up as the number of women in the relationshit goes up. I bet that would hold true for polytards as well, but there's no way academia would touch the topic.
I'd like to see that data because I don't believe it.
I also don't agree with the 1:1 on violence rates, and domestic violence rates.
To be honest, a swathe of male on male violence goes unreported as well because some amount of interpersonal violence among men is tolerated by all involved parties.
Then read NIBRS
White men 3.5 per 100k, black women 5.8 per 100k.
I don’t care about your feelings faggot. Every study show women dominate domestic violence rates. Every study also say female on male violence is the most underreported crime state by occurrence.
“But guys fighting is the same as women dominating unreciprocated domestic violence by 70%” again mealy mouthed faggotry.
I don't know why you've decided to be a shit head, I was looking to actually read the source of your information.
You reap what you sow.
And where exactly did I do that?
I gave you the source. Is NIBRS too complicated for you?
Again, I don't know why you're being a shit head. Which publication? What year? Do you have a DOI link?
It's fine if you don't have one, I don't know why you're being a cunt.
The only time the black female homicide rate wasn’t higher than white men was from 1984-2014. The stats I reported were from the 2021 NIBRS
https://x.com/fentasyl/status/1720218306810966395
Thank you for that. (I have no idea why we had to go through all of that)
From Data Hazard's own tweet, which only goes to 2005, the period between 1980 and 2005 is when black women have a lower per capita murder rate for the below 25 age groups, though the +25 are fairly similar.
The other post he included doesn't include females at all.
I looked through the FBI's Crime Data Explorer which used NIBRS, and it doesn't allow for a break-down by sex and race of offender. I'm not going to spend the time right now downloading the master file as an ASCII file and importing it into Excel or Power BI to sort through it if I don't have to.
From what you're showing me, it's that the murder rates of white men and black women appear to be similar, but also seem like the the white men are still higher than black women, and I'm not seeing anything that disputes that. What Datahazard said specifically:
That part seems to be true, but I'm not convinced that that is true in 2022 or 2025.
Why are you always so determined to have a wrong opinion on virtually every topic?
Lay off him. It’s gotta be brutal to be the poor schmuck at the Jewish Internet Defense League assigned to engage with this site.
It’s like clockwork. He’s a bad take machine.
Why do you believe I should avoid skepticism on a topic where men are physically larger, more aggressive, and are genetically & neurologically prone to be more violent in all cases contrasting with women. Why do sex differences, including different organs, magically disappear when you sub-select by race?
Mutual combat is not usually classified as criminal violence. Two guys punching each other outside a bar, with nothing more than a bloody nose as a result? Not the same as a skank (of any race) knifing her date then accusing him of violence.
"He disrespected me!"
"That's no reason to knife him in the back, Miss."
"He said he'd punch me!"
"Get him in cuffs & take him downtown!"
Mutual combat is actually illegal in most states. Most states don't have laws excluding it. As far as I know, just Washington and Texas. It's just that if it is mutual combat, and neither side co-operates with the police, there's not going to be a charge for it since they don't want to involve the cops, and the prosecutors won't care.
Now we can look at the rates of sexual crime arrests by foreign nationals in England and Wales.
Comparing to the general population:
• Sudanese are 24 times higher • Afghans are 20 times • Eritreans are 18.5 times • Iranians are 18 times • Iraqis are 17 times
Is the UK planning to increase policing and judicial spending by 20x when these people make up the majority of some areas?
Right! I said in another comment that the rate is 3X for "migrants" in Europe. That's true, but for those offspring of "migrants" the rate is also huge, and they get counted as "Native Britons" (or whatever) and hugely inflate those numbers. "Ethnics" being 10X or 20X more than Whites seems highly likely for the general population. Again this is despite being a small % of the overall population.
It's all migrants and 'native' blacks
The native European men and women were able to coexist peacefully for years yet somehow the rape and sexual assault issue only became a problem when the borders were opened.
"MEN ARE SO TOXIC AND DANGEROUS"
God Dam, you know the twats who say this were the idiots falling asleep in the back of history class.
I dont know what the fuck humanity's been up to for the last 100,000 years, but for the last 5,000 I think historians have a pretty good clue.
If they werent killing each other from invading tribes, it was being picked off by beasts that do not exists today.
Its that toxicity that gives us the right to be here, like holy shit. We really deserve to be invaded by fucking china or russia.
Really dumb if someone believes you can wipe out thousands of years of evolutionary baggage in a generation or two.
Literal fucking monkeys stumbling out of the cave and somehow we got computers, nuclear weapons, ai, etc. Its kinda amazing we havent wiped ourselves out yet.
Hundreds of thousands of years, if not 1 million.
Not "1 million years ago" either: for the past 1 million years up to (maybe) 3,000 years ago. A big difference, eh?
We haven't wiped each other out yet because genetic selection also favoured those who were more "tribal" & "law abiding" than homicidal maniacs... mostly. Guys who could control their rage did better than those who were constantly angry... mostly. :/
Fun fact, migrant women are as likely to commit crimes as German men which has been found out based on statistics recently. Even with the "men are more likely to commit crimes" it's crazy to see, yet not surprising. Brown people are the issue, not just the men.
All they care about is getting the government to kill their babies for free.
That's "liberation" for women
When conquistadors showed up the Mayans were slaughtering babies at altars before their temples. Matriarchies seem to often lead to infanticide and prostitution
They'd (Aztecs & Mayans) would actually breed their own children to BE sacrifices.
It's like modern "feminists" getting pregnant just so they can have (another) abortion. It's kindermörder. 🙁 & that's a hallmark of matriarchies, a fine observation!
Now who are the victims of those crimes? Hint - they're overwhelmingly not women.
Now compare crimes from indigenous men versus migrant men.
Literally 3X as likely to be raped by a "migrant" even though they're a small % of the population.
All across Europe, for a decade or more now. The more "migrants" they have? The higher the rape rates go. It's a rock-solid correlation.
Leftist women fantasize about being dicked down by gangs of inbred illiterate mongoloids.
Jesus.
That's the most anti-women comment I've ever seen on the internet that wasn't being screamed at me by an incel, or imp.
“Leftist women are the real sexists.”
You’re so fucking gay lol
Why do you always defend islamist rapists?
How the fuck is anti-woman? There is no way to completely stop all violent crime if humans with system of law exist. Is "men will get murdered anyway" inherently anti-man?
Yes "men will get murdered anyway" is anti-man, especially when we are talking about immigrants targeting said group.
It is a dismissal of the horrific consequences of a government policy to import rapists.
If a government official announced that 10 men were gang raped by a horde of illegals, but it was nothing to worry about because "men will get raped anyway", I would say the same thing and that it demonstrates misandric anti-male tendencies among the government.