It didn't go off. It says in the article the kid reached into the backpack and accidentally squeezed the trigger. That's far different than the gun just phantomly firing.
I'm always conflicted on these. It's a new phenomenon, going after the parents. For a third grader like this it might make sense, since the parents are clearly (ir)responsible, but I'm still deeply suspicious because this is obviously also antigun nonsense.
The framing is also antigun nonsense. As someone else mentioned, this gun didn't "go off." Guns (almost) never do that...*stares suspiciously at Sig P320*
Guns do "go off" - and are supposed to - when the trigger is pulled, like in this instance.
I'm always conflicted on these. It's a new phenomenon, going after the parents.
After the Orlando nightclub shooting, the Leftists tried going after the guy's ex-wife. She hadn't spoken with him in 3 years, but the Rainbow Brigade wanted revenge and the DA really tried to pin it all on her. That case was utter and complete bullshit, and I'm glad it was tossed almost immediately.
In this case, the parent's should be held responsible, if only for not securing their firearm properly. I don't find that to be anywhere near "anti-gun." If you're too much of a shithead to secure your firearms and they end up being used to cause harm, there should be consequences.
My issue with cases like these is that parental responsibility has turned into a twisted, schizophrenic, Schrodinger's beast of a monster that only applies in certain circumstances, and, for some reason, only benefits one side.
Kid brings a gun to school? Oh, I guess the parents are responsible! Timmy wants to be referred as Timothina? You will be lynched unless you let your little precious turn themselves into a chemically castrated eunch for pedos to abuse.
The parents were probably peices of shit, though, not gonna lie. Doesn't mean I'm not going to place the blame on the kid for being a sub-human retard.
The problem with "going after the parents" is that we are just picking one evil over another in a case where both evils are bad for us.
Because bad parents absolutely need to be held to task and accountable for their retarded decisions, but letting the government do that is also a hugely bad precedent setter for a lot of reasons.
In this case it seems absolutely justified, but like you said its also a conflicted position.
After a man died on a Manhattan subway train, a stranger who stumbled upon the body had sex with and robbed the corpse — and then the body was robbed by a second man, MTA and police sources said.
Cops are now searching for both men and released surveillance footage of the suspect they say violated and robbed the corpse.
"From one man He made all the nations, that they should inhabit the whole Earth; and He marked out their appointed times in history and the boundaries of their lands." — Acts 17:26
God placed the White man in Europe, the Asian in Asia, the negro in Africa, etc.
If He had wanted us jumbled up, He'd have made it that way from the start.
I really do dislike the fact that they'll go after the parents over something the kid did now. But these are black parents, so we'll see if the system still has a flavor of equal blind justice or not.
But on the other hand, he's a third grader, that's less than 10 years old, I think 8 years old is the third grade, unless my math went retarded on me.
And he managed to not only bring a loaded gun to school, but reach into his bag and squeeze the trigger.
Some of this seems like remarkable negligence on their part.
It didn't go off. It says in the article the kid reached into the backpack and accidentally squeezed the trigger. That's far different than the gun just phantomly firing.
STFU, ya' racist cracka! Muh nigga ain't due nuff'n, ya'hear!? Fcuk ya'll!
Dindu. FIFY
I'm always conflicted on these. It's a new phenomenon, going after the parents. For a third grader like this it might make sense, since the parents are clearly (ir)responsible, but I'm still deeply suspicious because this is obviously also antigun nonsense.
The framing is also antigun nonsense. As someone else mentioned, this gun didn't "go off." Guns (almost) never do that...*stares suspiciously at Sig P320*
Guns do "go off" - and are supposed to - when the trigger is pulled, like in this instance.
After the Orlando nightclub shooting, the Leftists tried going after the guy's ex-wife. She hadn't spoken with him in 3 years, but the Rainbow Brigade wanted revenge and the DA really tried to pin it all on her. That case was utter and complete bullshit, and I'm glad it was tossed almost immediately.
In this case, the parent's should be held responsible, if only for not securing their firearm properly. I don't find that to be anywhere near "anti-gun." If you're too much of a shithead to secure your firearms and they end up being used to cause harm, there should be consequences.
Plot twist: What if the kid bought it on his own with his money from slangin'?
I suppose that is a possibility, yes. 🤣
I'm saying, based on past usage that, even when justified, going after the parents has some antigun motive.
Careful, that precedent can be used to go after burglary victims.
My issue with cases like these is that parental responsibility has turned into a twisted, schizophrenic, Schrodinger's beast of a monster that only applies in certain circumstances, and, for some reason, only benefits one side.
Kid brings a gun to school? Oh, I guess the parents are responsible! Timmy wants to be referred as Timothina? You will be lynched unless you let your little precious turn themselves into a chemically castrated eunch for pedos to abuse.
The parents were probably peices of shit, though, not gonna lie. Doesn't mean I'm not going to place the blame on the kid for being a sub-human retard.
The problem with "going after the parents" is that we are just picking one evil over another in a case where both evils are bad for us.
Because bad parents absolutely need to be held to task and accountable for their retarded decisions, but letting the government do that is also a hugely bad precedent setter for a lot of reasons.
In this case it seems absolutely justified, but like you said its also a conflicted position.
The article right underneath
https://www.nydailynews.com/2025/04/10/man-sought-nypd-sex-corpse-manhattan-subway-train-whitehall-street/
I want to get off Mx. Libtard's Wild Ride.
Wowie zowie, I wonder why no one likes public transportation, including the city degenerates forced to use it.
That's some post-apoc nightmare fuel....
Ban blacks!
The only real solution
The most surprising part is that they found the father.
You cold bastard! 🤣
A precocious young scholar getting a headstart on the school to prison pipeline? And how nice that his parents were also involved!
Sheeit, we teach our little nigga right. Watch, he gon' be the next Obama, bicthes!
Gun in 3rd grader’s backpack goes off at Va. school, parents arrested
Do blacks belong in this country? Even the “good ones”?
God placed the White man in Europe, the Asian in Asia, the negro in Africa, etc.
If He had wanted us jumbled up, He'd have made it that way from the start.
"Why are you treating that monkey species like humans?"
The problem with good ones is that statistical outliers like them have kids who regress to the mean.
They don't belong in society
I really do dislike the fact that they'll go after the parents over something the kid did now. But these are black parents, so we'll see if the system still has a flavor of equal blind justice or not.
But on the other hand, he's a third grader, that's less than 10 years old, I think 8 years old is the third grade, unless my math went retarded on me.
And he managed to not only bring a loaded gun to school, but reach into his bag and squeeze the trigger.
Some of this seems like remarkable negligence on their part.
It's a black 3rd grader, so he might have been held back a few times.
damn those ninjas
Ninjas, you say? 😎