Win / KotakuInAction2
KotakuInAction2
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
KotakuInAction2 The Official Gamergate Forum
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

63
[Oscars so white] Transphobic Academy Awards once again give Best Actress to a biological female- Mikey Madison, who played a hooker. (archive.is)
posted 1 year ago by YesMovement 1 year ago by YesMovement +63 / -0
35 comments share
35 comments share save hide report block hide replies
Comments (35)
sorted by:
▲ 26 ▼
– Mpetey123 26 points 1 year ago +26 / -0

Dune 2 won for best sound? Are you fucking kidding me?? I barely heard the movie.

I'm kind of proud that I don't recognize half the names of the nominees in everything.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 20 ▼
– XBX_X 20 points 1 year ago +20 / -0

Dude, “Anora” was crowned Best Picture, sweeping five awards. It's a movie about a Russian rich kid who pays a hooker to partake in a fraudulent marriage to secure citizenship. That's the very "BEST" story Pedowood could produce? The Oscars are totally bankrupt.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– ariloulaleelay 7 points 1 year ago +7 / -0

There's so much amerikwan hubris in that picture that I even dunno. Do they really think that a russian oligarch's kid life is so bad that he'll do everything for a green card?

Or do they think that russian elite escorts are so fugly that he'd fall head over heels for a 5/10 khazar girl without even khazar milkers? Lo-o-ol.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– SuurSuomi39_II 5 points 1 year ago +5 / -0

I'm kind of proud that I don't recognize half the names of the nominees in everything.

I decided to see for myself and read the article (normally I wouldn't), and I can safely say I recognize 0 of the names.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– lapalapa 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

I'm not against that. Although I'd be more into the soundtrack than the sound itself. The music of that movie did something very interesting in fuzzing the line between analog and synthesized in their folkish music. It sounded very new to me and I greatly respect it.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Mpetey123 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

I don't remember the soundtrack enough to comment on it. But I think soundtrack has it's own category. I'm glad you liked the music

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 25 ▼
– TheOutlaw 25 points 1 year ago +25 / -0

I'll never understand why people give a shit about awards Pedowood cretins give each other to jerk themselves off.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 11 ▼
– XBX_X 11 points 1 year ago +11 / -0

Not only that, but "awards" that bought and sold based on seniority or hard cash.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– MegoThor 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

I would have a semblance of respect for them if they just gave out awards based on box office.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 17 ▼
– Kienan 17 points 1 year ago +17 / -0

I don't even care enough to laugh at them.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 13 ▼
– FrozeInFear 13 points 1 year ago +13 / -0

Bald(ing) black women are literally being genocided by what has gone on this past week. #rustice4rupaul

permalink save report block reply
▲ 12 ▼
– stroemia 12 points 1 year ago +12 / -0

If it wasn’t for post like these. I would have forgotten about the Oscar’s a while ago.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 13 ▼
– J_Darnley 13 points 1 year ago +13 / -0

This post is how I learned it was yesterday. I am rather impressed by myself.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 10 ▼
– botzwanapunani 10 points 1 year ago +10 / -0

Mikey Madison Is Shocked as She Beats Front-Runner Demi Moore for Best Actress

This girl must have suck a mean dick to be able to win.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 13 ▼
– throwawayaccount2037 13 points 1 year ago +13 / -0

Hilariously, one movie was about not abandoning your soul for a younger body and learning to appreciate aging gracefully, while the other was about glorifying being a whore.

Ironic.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 8 ▼
– 8theBritish 8 points 1 year ago +8 / -0

And this is supposed to make me care about that glorified money laundering scheme?

permalink save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– YesMovement [S] 6 points 1 year ago +6 / -0

Oh, the acting award they did give to the movie Emilia Pérez? Cis woman Zoe Saldaña

TRIGGERED

permalink save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– 1776ReasonsWhy 6 points 1 year ago +6 / -0

Dammit, I was hoping to see the blowout of a tranny getting Best Actress for that horror show.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– YesMovement [S] 4 points 1 year ago +4 / -0

Dude was too based

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– YesMovement [S] 5 points 1 year ago +5 / -0

They also gave it to a younger woman instead of older Demi Moore, showing ageism as well.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Modeler43 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

This isn't really a great argument considering the winners for best actress over the past few years: Michelle Yeoh at age 60 in 2022, Jessica Chastain at age 43 in 2021, Frances McDormand at age 62 in 2020, Renée Zellweger at 49 in 2019

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– YesMovement [S] 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

Well it wasn't a serious argument anyways

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Modeler43 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

K

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– The_Shadow_of_Intent 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

I don't remember any of the Best Picture winners from the last decade or so except Moonlight, which I'm pretty sure was the BLM year.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Modeler43 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

Everything Everywhere All at Once (a few years back) is fantastic

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– ModsAreAIDS 7 points 1 year ago +7 / -0

No it isn't. It's reddit tier "lol so random" put to the screen, with the mandatory obnoxious girlboss protagonist for the modern audience. And it comes with a bonus obnoxious girlboss as the antagonist. The only redeeming thing about it was that it wasn't a sequel or a remake.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Modeler43 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

I mean, the randomness wasn't for random's sake. It wasn't like a "holds up spork" shit at the wall willy nilly. There was purpose behind most of the "random" bits, if not for meaning then for at least setup/punchline.

I'm not sure what was obnoxious about either the protag or the antag. They were pretty standard.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– SR388-SAX 4 points 1 year ago +4 / -0

Yeah, especially the part with the half naked dudes trying to OH SO RANDOM ram their asses on the giant dildo. That was really awesome.

Fuck that idiotic movie. And no, that wasn't the only thing I found eye-rollingly cringeworthy, it was just the most memorable. Or the (SPOILERS!) everything bagel. So quirky!

That it was based on a total misunderstanding of statistics was actually the least of its problems.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Modeler43 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

I think you're confusing silly with random. Yes, it was silly, but there was leadup to that, particularly in the display of the trophy early on which was a knock on auditors.

The bagel, I'll give you as a bit too much, and a bit of a blow, but the movie isn't about the silliness. It's about the emotional connection of the characters, which I found to be well done

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– SR388-SAX 3 points 1 year ago +3 / -0

The whole fucking point was randomness, and random chance, and using random improbable events (except that once they become intentional they cease to be improbable; fucking idiot "I love science!" writers) to hop between universes. So yes, it was explicitly chosen because RANDOM. And simply foreshadowing it doesn't make it good or entertaining.

Was there emotional connection between the characters? I suppose, once you get past them blaming each other for all of their problems, and seeing all of the realities where they're better off if they'd never gotten together. But you can have close connection between characters without an idiotic premise and Whedon-tier Millennial dialogue while completely misusing Michelle Yeoh.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Modeler43 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

Mmm, "randomness" definitely wasn't the point. Yes, the multiverse events were the driver of the plot, but that wasn't the point of the movie. It centered around relationships and choice.

Was there emotional connection between the characters? I suppose, once you get past them blaming each other for all of their problems, and seeing all of the realities where they're better off if they'd never gotten together.

I'm wondering if you even took in the dialogue or you watched it while scrolling your phone. There was far more to it than this, especially considering the different realities.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– nikgtasa 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

Is the gay scene actually in the movie? And it was shown in theaters?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– WhitePhoenix 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

Makes sense, they're all whores anyway.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

Original 8chan Links to Gamer Gate:

.

The main GG discussion is on the videogames board: https://8chan.moe/v/

.

GamerGate archive is at https://8chan.moe/gamergatehq/

.

GamerGate Wiki:

https://ggwiki.deepfreeze.it/index.php/Main_Page

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Rules:

.

ONE: Do not advocate for illegal violence or post other illegal activity. (Be aware of your local laws.)

.

TWO: Don't threaten, harass, or impersonate users. Also: don't be a psycho. New users will be held to a higher standard.

.

THREE: Do not post porn.

.

FOUR: NSFW/NSFL content must be flaired NSFW.

.

FIVE: No vote manipulation. Do not break communities.win's features.

.

SIX: No spam or reposts. Do not make more than 5 threads a day.

.

SEVEN: Do not post falsehoods and hoaxes that are obvious to an uncontroversial degree.

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Moderation Logs:

.

(Two different versions, Scored has more features and is cleaner, but .win let's you see a few more details in certain instances.)

  • Scored
  • .win

Moderators

  • DomitiusOfMassilia
  • C
  • BandageBandolier
  • CarmenOfSandiego
  • The_Shadow_of_Intent
  • SocraticMethod1
  • Kienan
  • Smith1980
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026.02.01 - 8wn6p (status)

Copyright © 2026.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy