Dude's face is getting fat, too. Weird, since he doesn't look to fat elsewhere.
I would love to ask Tucker what he thinks that hundred billion should be spent on, and if he would vote for it as a conservative.
What an absolutely retarded argument. For so many reasons. You don't have to spend it at all. And, even if you did, if you think the Ukraine nonsense is pointless...yeah, even spending it on "the welfare state" would still be better than sending it overseas. It's just so fucking stupid. So, as a conservative, you can't argue against sending money overseas...because it would also be wasted here...so you're not a conservative...unless you're fine with sending money overseas. It's stupid and circular.
I think some people are so caught up in the Ukraine = good and beautiful democracy narrative that they can't imagine that someone would think sending 100 billion there to be embezzled is a bad thing.
It's like that thread about Piers Morgan, where his counterpoint to someone not wanting to send money to Ukraine was just assuming by default that everyone wants to send money to Israel, and thus the person was a hypocrite. Sad.
I recognize it because the same people are doing "fake libertarianism" for all the same points.
You exclusively apply a single conservative/libertarian principle, and then dismiss the whole argument as not real conservative/libertarian.
Dan is demanding we be fiscally conservative on welfare, but not war-whoring.
Libertarian Socialists will demand you join them in condemning censorship when they call for assassinations, but will condemn you for "hate speech" when you say that "there are only two genders".
Tucker doesn’t know what he’s talking about. He likes to visit Moscow and talk about how great the grocery stores are
EMC in 2022 (probably): our sanctions have ensured that Russian grocery stores are empty. We is winning.
EMC in 2025: OMG Tucker went to Moscow and pointed out that contrary to our claims, Russian grocery stores are actually pretty decent.
I saw a YouTube video, so judge the accuracy based on that, that all the boycotting stores are still there they just took down the signage and replaced it with genric signs and names.
All the "boycott" does is make sure Western corpos can't collect rent from Russia. Business continues as usual. Intellectual property rights are fake and gay.
This is true for brands like McDonald's and Starbucks. It's not true for most high-fashion labels, which are simply routing inventory from their Chinese stores to their Russian stores as opposed to shipping to them directly. This is true for all LVMH brands (Louis Vuitton, etc). So when the "news" says that China is buying more luxury goods than ever, they really mean Russia.
Imagine that... Russia, a country that is in the top 5 of arable land per capita are not starving to death. That's not including pastures for farm animals either which they could increase by a vast amount by simply deforesting a bit in the south west.
Like most people who got big in Trump's first term, he balked at the overwhelming odds against the MAGA and sold out to protect himself instead of showing he had any principles whatsoever.
Like Pence, he will be remembered as a loser and a snake by history. Because the Right won't forgive him and the Left wouldn't either. He tried to shackle his horse to the RINO money/power train right as their reign was crumbling.
Funny how we see politicians like Dan Crenshaw and Mitch McConnell somehow get re-elected over and over again, when they blatantly go against what the average Republican wants, almost like it’s proof that the voting system is rigged.
Btw Tucker Carlson was a regular customer at Comet Ping Pong, he was and probably still is good friends with James Alefantis, and admittedly friends with Hunter Biden for that matter. The opposition to the Crenshaws within the government and on MSM are all controlled opposition.
Anyone who bothered looking into James Alefantis, the pizza shop owner who somehow manages to be among the 50 most powerful lobbyists in Washington, and caters to some of the biggest names in politics, and regularly uses pedo references on social media, already knows this guy and any of his close buddies are no fuckin good. You apparently never bothered looking.
When someone with EPM makes a threat like that, best to take it seriously. He has the training to make good on it.
Because EPM is a congressman, there really isn't much anyone can do about it, as Congress has given themselves pretty much carte blanche to say whatever they want.
Dude's face is getting fat, too. Weird, since he doesn't look to fat elsewhere.
What an absolutely retarded argument. For so many reasons. You don't have to spend it at all. And, even if you did, if you think the Ukraine nonsense is pointless...yeah, even spending it on "the welfare state" would still be better than sending it overseas. It's just so fucking stupid. So, as a conservative, you can't argue against sending money overseas...because it would also be wasted here...so you're not a conservative...unless you're fine with sending money overseas. It's stupid and circular.
I agree it's telling that he can't fathom not taking people's money. Well we will lose it if we don't use it.
Huh. "If I don't steal your stuff someone else will steal it."
WHERE, WHERE, WHERE have we heard this before? 🤔🤔🤔
I think some people are so caught up in the Ukraine = good and beautiful democracy narrative that they can't imagine that someone would think sending 100 billion there to be embezzled is a bad thing.
It's like that thread about Piers Morgan, where his counterpoint to someone not wanting to send money to Ukraine was just assuming by default that everyone wants to send money to Israel, and thus the person was a hypocrite. Sad.
"sovereign democratic country"
I just want someone to ask him: do you even know what sovereignty is?
Don't forget a swathe of that money that was embezzled was sent to ShareBlue.
Much conservative. Very republican.
I mean, yeah, cucking to our enemies is a republican as it gets. He's actually spot on with his description.
This is fake conservativism.
I recognize it because the same people are doing "fake libertarianism" for all the same points.
You exclusively apply a single conservative/libertarian principle, and then dismiss the whole argument as not real conservative/libertarian.
Dan is demanding we be fiscally conservative on welfare, but not war-whoring.
Libertarian Socialists will demand you join them in condemning censorship when they call for assassinations, but will condemn you for "hate speech" when you say that "there are only two genders".
He hates Tucker for inventing, or at least popularizing the name "Eyepatch McCain".
Every time he reads, is called, or see's that. He likely internally curses Tuckers name.
EMC in 2022 (probably): our sanctions have ensured that Russian grocery stores are empty. We is winning.
EMC in 2025: OMG Tucker went to Moscow and pointed out that contrary to our claims, Russian grocery stores are actually pretty decent.
I saw a YouTube video, so judge the accuracy based on that, that all the boycotting stores are still there they just took down the signage and replaced it with genric signs and names.
All the "boycott" does is make sure Western corpos can't collect rent from Russia. Business continues as usual. Intellectual property rights are fake and gay.
Can confirm this is how most of them are.
This is true for brands like McDonald's and Starbucks. It's not true for most high-fashion labels, which are simply routing inventory from their Chinese stores to their Russian stores as opposed to shipping to them directly. This is true for all LVMH brands (Louis Vuitton, etc). So when the "news" says that China is buying more luxury goods than ever, they really mean Russia.
Imagine that... Russia, a country that is in the top 5 of arable land per capita are not starving to death. That's not including pastures for farm animals either which they could increase by a vast amount by simply deforesting a bit in the south west.
This guy could have been a massive figure and he chose this for himself. He's a loser and a faggot.
Like most people who got big in Trump's first term, he balked at the overwhelming odds against the MAGA and sold out to protect himself instead of showing he had any principles whatsoever.
Like Pence, he will be remembered as a loser and a snake by history. Because the Right won't forgive him and the Left wouldn't either. He tried to shackle his horse to the RINO money/power train right as their reign was crumbling.
It all makes sense how quickly SNL apologized to him. He was always a one eyed snake. Curious if he went to Epstein’s Island, too.
If it wasn't Epstein's, it was some other island, I bet.
Remember he was on the WEF's website under "future leaders".
Former state sanctioned sociopathic killers don't make good civilian leaders
Funny how we see politicians like Dan Crenshaw and Mitch McConnell somehow get re-elected over and over again, when they blatantly go against what the average Republican wants, almost like it’s proof that the voting system is rigged. Btw Tucker Carlson was a regular customer at Comet Ping Pong, he was and probably still is good friends with James Alefantis, and admittedly friends with Hunter Biden for that matter. The opposition to the Crenshaws within the government and on MSM are all controlled opposition.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/07/05/AR2007070501270.html
The pizza place run by weirdos where online crazies claimed they were abusing children in the basement even though they had no basement? So?
So?
Anyone who bothered looking into James Alefantis, the pizza shop owner who somehow manages to be among the 50 most powerful lobbyists in Washington, and caters to some of the biggest names in politics, and regularly uses pedo references on social media, already knows this guy and any of his close buddies are no fuckin good. You apparently never bothered looking.
When someone with EPM makes a threat like that, best to take it seriously. He has the training to make good on it.
Because EPM is a congressman, there really isn't much anyone can do about it, as Congress has given themselves pretty much carte blanche to say whatever they want.
I mean it was clearly a joke, the other guy laughed.
That said, I don’t trust Dan, and it feels like his need to be liked by the main stream media has overridden his moral principles
Was he serious? No.
Was it "just a joke"? Also no.