"They're incels. They've posted on their social media accounts explaining that they haven't been able to find someone to date, someone to be intimate with. They have created this echo chamber of violence against women.
So instead of dealing with the individuals vile acts, the BBC decided they would exploit it into an agenda to paint a whole group of men as a dangerous threat to women.
Annie, who works as a translator, says she wants to drive awareness of male violence towards women.
Yes, they are actively trying to push the idea that being unattractive is "male violence towards women".
Modern day "journalism" which should be more accurately described as activism.
How about we deal with the sick culture that mass produces men with nothing to lose? Being treated as subhuman in the dating market is part of it, but lacking any sort of economic future thanks to DIE is a bigger problem.
That's what wars were for. To jettison the excess youthful male members of a society into a meat grinder and use them for the 'common good'. But now-a-days that doesn't really tend to happen, in part due to low birthrates in the Western world.
They would rather just marginalize them and make them politically powerless in favor of immigrants and women (due to culturally suicidal ideological reasons).
They may still try that, it will probably end up biting them in the ass. You have to trick the human sacrifices into thinking their society is worth fighting for to make the meat grinder solution work, and the men they would like to dispose of know full well that this society deserves to die.
Yeah if EU / US tries to mass conscript citizens, but migrants and illegals are left out of it...
That's not gonna go well. Whether the conscription is successful or not. Lotsa unrest.
Even if you manage to conscript 1000's of Middle Eastern troops. They are the worst soldiers on Earth. No military training program in those countries have worked. Whether it's western or eastern approach. You'd have to go full commissar mode, rather than honor doctrine.
JD Unwin's book Sex and Culture becomes more of a prophecy every day.
This, and the trend of women "empowerment" and feminism contributes a lot to this.
Lets be honest. Looks always has and will still matter in any society and at any time. Having good looks is like starting the game of life with the Konami code. Just look at how retarded the South Korean society is and their fascination with plastic surgery and growth hormones - but i digress.
Anyways, in the past, it was a natural balance because they were also average women for those average men - they still needed to find a mate that provides and give them shelter make kids. This went all the window when the world embraced feminism and put women on a pedestal while also shitting on men.
The whole incel movement naturally feeds into the moral superiority complex of the progressives, especially the women, which are, in fact, the core cohort for same. That these men can't find a date because modern dating culture is gynocentric in the extreme is so far outside the bubble these women live in it might as well be from Mars.
As a result, we get stories like this.
The sad thing of it is, stories like this just make the incel culture worse, because now they are getting Pidgeon holed as violent terrorists who just hate women. The professional class progressives doing the Pidgeon holing never think about what incels will do if they are ostracized even further from society, because progressives never think about consequences of their actions.
I think the ostricization is on purpose. To manufacture 'right wing incels' so they can create the problem and sell a terrible solution with a political cudgel. 'See! We need to have tighter retrictions on all men' etc.
Though... Maybe with the trans loophole, there will always be an out on paper haha. Angry terrorist right wing incels out there (all 3 of you), always make sure you have a trans flag on you. Then the media will pretend you don't exist.
I wouldn't surprise if the Leftists decided that they could use this as an opportunity to regulate both men's privacy and political dissent. Don't have enough women who can vouch for your character? Gotta put you on a list, have random searches of your house, and ban them from communicating online.
It's a far-fetched idea, but so is most of the shit they normally do.
I don't think the blanket online ban for 'problematic men' is too far fetched at all. They've been trying to co-opt, infiltrate, demonize male-dominated spaces for decades. The language is already in place. Safetyism the religion de jour.
Anytime a dude gets a large, young male audience, the global establishment aligns to start tearing them down. Even if it's just YouTube dummies like Pewdiepie or Asmongold.
It wasn't even ever a movement. It was a subreddit that dared to exist on Reddit, where women also exist and thereby feel "unsafe" that those gross types are allowed to speak one click away from them.
Like, its an oft forgotten piece of this little cultural history that it was literally memed into being this big "thing" by people all across Reddit whining endlessly about the incel board being allowed to exist and speak, with them constantly posting everything there around as a "LOOK AT THIS STUPID/EVIL THING" freakshow.
Then there was that one shooter who was assigned the label "incel" (not Elliot Rodger, that was years earlier, a canadian one I believe) and suddenly every news media was using the word and now its the boogeyman for the Left and Women second only to Trump.
And now any man who complains about women is an incel, because sexist/misogynist lost its flair a decade ago, to the point where it doesn't even make sense how an involuntary celibate is somehow a married father of many.
It existed for a while, that's one of the reasons why everyone got so testy and pissy and all the various SRS types would post about it daily asking why it wasn't banned. It had a decent history before being noticed, and then was able to limp for some time.
And then yeah it got banned, which I'm sure just made all those guys instantly go improve their lives and stop hatin'.
A group of men who are actually punched down onto and face actual discrimination and ostracisation. I worry we are approaching the moment where we strip everything from such men because of activism and lobbying from the likes of the BBC that they will believe they have nothing to lose. And then all bets are off. And then we will see the very thing they claim we're seeing now.
Was it in Germany where they classified rape by an immigrant as a "sexual emergency" ?
Yes.
Or the alternative name - a "special romantic operation".
It was also Germany that intentionally put children with pedophiles.
I mean, even if this was the truth, women can feel free to act like normal human beings in regards to dating anytime. You can't expect men of any social standing or culture to just be deprived of something that has been established through the entire existence of the species and not become mentally unhealthy.
The reported attack happened in Dec 2022. Why is it only being published now?
Mid-looking peasant phenotype bong woman travels alone to other side of Earth, gets groped Day 1 by Vietkong, blames Western chuds
Countries like this deal with a lot of "retarded white people show up, act defenseless, get fucked up" scenarios, to the point they don't care morally or legally to help them. This is more than most of these stories usually go where they just say "we'll look into it" and that's the end of it.
So using the same logic any government anywhere in the world can be compared to every other and considered just as bad for any and all acts carried out by the latter. Ergo, UK is China.
BBC is run by feminazis who prove almost everything theimp1 (RIP) says is true.
Unfortunately the BBC is well read among bored females inventing laws in Europe
Alternative title: Woman taps into her retard blood to overpower two malnourished rice farmers in rural Vietnam.
Looks at author.
Why do I feel like this story is fake.
They always try to frame violent non-Whites as a gender problem. It's a psyop.
I'm surprised they let her print something negative against a different ethnicity. I bet if she was alive in the 60s she'd be all about Vietnamese posting violent images. She single handily fought off two very violent men.
It's called getting out ahead of the story. If they don't do it, it will get framed as "avoid these non-White shit holes." They want to frame these things in gender terms. They did the same thing with that Rwandan who stabbed those little girls.
Its the martial status of the men that matters to the BBC. That will override any privilege they get for their ethnicity.
Incels, by definition, are the easiest possible target.
As a group of people who are self-isolating, not appealing to women, and do not have wide social networks; there's really nothing to stop the media from using them as an easy punching bag.
if you actually believed that you wouldn't be attacking them