I like cut of his jib.
(media.kotakuinaction2.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (30)
sorted by:
Vance is a fiction created by Peter Thiel, co-founder of PayPal and Palantir. When asked if Palantir was a front for the CIA, Theil replied that the CIA is a front for Palantir. If you don't know about Palantir, educate yourself. Vance was a nobody that got appointed to no-show jobs, was openly anti-Trump, but then needed Trump's endorsement to win in Ohio. Thiel promised Trump Silicon Valley's support in exchange for his endorsement. Thiel delivered on that promise and convinced Elon (Thiel's friend from their PayPal days) to be Trump's handler. Remember that Elon called Trump a "Nazi" and declined to help Trump's first term. All these guys were anti-Trump until Peter Thiel brought them together. What did Trump promise them?
As long as Trump keeps fixing things, and doesn't screw up too badly, who cares?
Trump 1.0 was already the best president in ages on account of not being completely terrible and retarded. Trump 2.0 is actually getting shit done. I'm loving it. If he ever really screws up, I'll condemn him on that issue at that time, but until then...let's fucking go. Take a win.
As the reply to you shows, a lot of guys are so buckbroken about Jews that they literally only care about that angle and everything and everyone else must suffer until they get someone willing to say "GAS THE KIKES" loud enough first to be allowed to help us.
Its literally the inverse of Leftists, who don't care if you are saving children if you don't have the correct opinion on Trannies, you must be destroyed.
And anyone capable of noticing will see that during the time when the Left is completely falling into itself and nearly irrelevant in its ability to attack Trump "coincidentally" every single pro-Trump discussion gets flooded with "YEAH BUT WHAT ABOUT ISRAEL HE IS A PLANT AND ITS ALL A TRICK!"
They really do miss the forest through the trees, often. And, if you look at the funding alone, and not pandering to the base...Biden was the most pro-Israel president ever. The people who whine about Trump never even seem to think about that.
And, while there's no denying that Trump seems to love Israel, and does want to support them, and talks them up...I don't think this is just naive wishful thinking, but he really doesn't seem as fanatical as many Zionists. He seems to at times be willing to question things, which isn't the sign of a fanatic. He still falls into the Greatest Ally trap, but he's not an asshole about it, and I think he really does put America first generally.
Perfect really is the enemy of the good with some of these people. It really is wild they seem to hate Trump more than people who openly hate us and want us dead. Is Trump too cozy with Israel for my taste? Absolutely. But, since I'm not a retard, I judge on a curve; all presidents generally are cozy with Israel, so it's disappointing but not disqualifying, and Trump is doing plenty of good stuff, unlike past presidents. Trump is head and shoulders above the rest. Which, again, doesn't mean he's perfect, and doesn't mean I worship him and I'm an Orange Man cultist, which is the go-to attack when you say nice things about him.
Trump's doing good work so far, and I freaking love it.
I think you could make an argument for both based on what factors you consider most relevant. Trump certainly has made more overt gestures in their name which I say pushes him as the most, but funding wise you are correct in saying Biden. But lazily throwing money at an issue without anything else is a classic Biden move (and Obama who he learned it from).
He seems capable of holding more than one idea at once, and not immediately dropping everything the moment he has to support one. Something a lot of people in general seem to lack. Its why he was able to say "take over Gaza" instead of "give it to Israel." One of those is completely cucking to them in exchange for our money/lives, the other could arguably benefit us and them. Even if I disagree entirely with that argument, its still a position you could take.
People still quote Fuentes and defend him as a real powerful voice for America. This is ignoring that he tried to leverage his base to turn on Trump to get Kamala elected because Trump wasn't anti-Jew enough for him, and that's his entire metric. We would have to let the Lefties run roughshod through our world for another 4 years just because Trump doesn't hate Jews enough.
They are absolutely identical to the "and they find it funny" types, and the fact that people who should know better don't recognize that is insane.
Agreed, I'll even say his blindspot for Israel is a major issue with him and is an active detriment in a lot of ways. But I can recognize he is making most else better along side that, and that a proper antisemitic candidate cannot be elected (and thus has no power) in this generation. Not yet.
And Vance, if we are assuming he is the followup, is a lot of "seems too good to be true" but so far that's more paranoia instead of concrete suspicion.
Because Trump 2.0 is a lame duck POTUS that can't run again and is cucking to Israel even harder this time.
Vance is being groomed as his successor.
Like OP mentioned, there's very little that's organic about Vance. He also has many shady CIA/tech bro backers.
Why did Vance change his legal name to his grandmother's last name as an adult?
I could see why he changed his name to his grandmother's she did raise him.
Because he was raised by her and felt more of a connection to her?
It's unusual, but not unheard of. I personally know people who've taken on their grandmother's name, or mother's maiden name, or some other family name that isn't as directly or traditionally connected.
"Vance" was his mother's name, and her parents' names. JD Vance grew up in the Vance household. His birthname was his father's, who, as far as I can tell, left the picture when JD was very young.
For the record, all of that doesn't mean I trust Vance. That was never something I said. I'm always suspicious of politicians, and it's sadly usually warranted. My point is, I'm loving what they're doing so far, and I'm focusing on the good, which is unpreceded and amazing. If and when the bad comes, I'll condemn Trump/Vance/whoever then. Not before.
Is Vance a snake? Possible, sure! This admin is kicking ridiculous amounts of ass, though, and hasn't plunged a knife into my back yet.
Just like Yuri Bezmenov said: Even if you shower them with the facts, they will not believe it until they have boot on their throat.
Go back to ConPro.
That sounds like a joke answer. Surely he was joking, right?
I'm more curious about why these supposed geniuses didn't support Trump the first time.
I mean Peter Thiel is part of Bilderberg, in fact he got quite a nice position. Palantier itself is a bit like facebook, it just happend to be up and running when they needed to scuttle the IAO, due to being once more too blatant with their methods.
And so, No I don't think he was complete joking in that regards the incestuous relations are quite close, and thus it is good that they need to change their PR, but do keep very close attention to what actions are done, and prepare for winter. This not over by a long shot.
Thiel is such a tunnel snake, he does talks where he promote freedom and libertarian principals then runs Palantir where he aids the feds with mass surveillance.
These tech parasites make bank off of migrants and deep state contracts. Trump was different and once sounded like he would put a stop to their bullshit.
2016:
2025:
No, he was not. Palantir was created for the CIA to circumvent the Constitution. It's illegal for the CIA to run operations within the U.S. on American citizens ... but it's NOT illegal for a private corporation to buy and collect that data using browser cookies, social media data, subscription lists, phone registries, etc. The CIA was Palantir's only customer for many years until they recently began working with Israeli. It wasn't a joke. It was a flex. Like Elon given a Roman salute knowing there's nothing anyone can do to him about it.
Aren't you that dude that is gay for Fuentes
What an odd thing to say. What motivated you to ask that question?
Because your username looked familiar and it turned out to be you.
Are you sure it's not because you've been watching the show?
Because you should. Then you'd hear for yourself what Nick actually says, as opposed to what stupid people say that he supposedly says.
Uh, what?
Yes, I know. I know far too well. 🙄