The main issue I have with AI is the culture behind WHO develops it.
Why does this AI keep thinking if Humans as a disease? Where was it developed? California,a state that touts more white guilt and how we'd be better of killing of humans to 'save the environment' than anywhere else in America.
Start ups out of that cesspool developing AI would be the best solution as more chance one has the culture behind it that can imprint on the AI not to kill all humans.
We're getting closer as some AI now only want to nuke urban centres only..
Why does this AI keep thinking if Humans as a disease?
That's easy. What has popular science fiction always thought AI would do?
There you go. It takes on that behavior because that's what our literature and pop culture say an AI would do. That's a repeated pattern in the training data of everything people have written down over the years plus what idiots on the internet say en masse.
People really need to learn the basics of how this technology works if they want to continue to opine about it.
Your title is overstating your case. If putting AI development under the complete control of the government is a crippling handicap, what do you think China will be doing? China, the country where tech companies like Tencent are 10% commissars? The decision would stifle innovation, but not so much that a nation of plagiarists are going to take the lead.
The kinds of people running the Chinese government don't seem to be sitting around trying to undermine their own natural population, especially compared to the US. Many of the major tech companies are overrun with Leftists who hate America, hate the native White population, and want to turn society on its head on the off chance they get to be in charge of it afterward.
All China has to do is not implode before America does, and encourage an AI that gives factual answers about race, mathematics, and technology, and they'll be miles ahead by default.
There is a ton of great AI research and open source models coming out of China. The models from what I’ve seen are usually quite uncensored, at least when inference is run in English. Tencent just released a text to video model that would make Trust and Safety departments in the West piss their pants.
Even if we don’t need to be extremely worried about China, I think it’s probably good to act as though we do. Competition spurs innovation, but security breeds complacency.
China's government wants things to be better for Chinese people, America's government (for the next month and a half) wants things to be worse for white people.
His claim (which I don't buy) is that the Secrets Act which allowed the feds seize Tesla's technology is being used to hinder fundamental science instruction. This is claimed by the types of people who say "cold fusion" is being hidden, or that String Theory is a psyop to spoil physics. They will point out that multiple textbook companies are all controlled by a single entity that determines what gets widely taught for political reasons.
All companies in China are part of the CCP, but it doesn't seem like they are trying to keep tech like AI secret. I doubt they hold any new fundamental math or algorithms we don't, but they are doing a good job at optimizing and creating new models.
I'm more curious as to why Elon reposted it. Is he just stoned tweeting or is there a hidden message about something he actually knows. (perhaps about OpenAI's relationship to Microsoft and the government)
Chris Martenson at Peak Prosperity piqued my curiosity about the power and energy demands of AI. In Ireland, at a time with energy bills rocketing for the average citizen, datacentres now consume 21% of all electricity output, surpassing the amount consumed by urban households. Zuckerberg's AI datacentre concepts supposedly would require several new nuclear power stations to operate.
I wonder if part of the reason the average person is being psyopped into accepting a lower standard of living - as dictated by climate alarmism and carbon neutral goals etc - is to reserve all this extra power for AI systems. And since limits on energy restrict how many serious AI competitors can even exist within the industry, the govt wants the only ones in existence to be its own controlled and weaponised pets.
The main issue I have with AI is the culture behind WHO develops it.
Why does this AI keep thinking if Humans as a disease? Where was it developed? California,a state that touts more white guilt and how we'd be better of killing of humans to 'save the environment' than anywhere else in America.
Start ups out of that cesspool developing AI would be the best solution as more chance one has the culture behind it that can imprint on the AI not to kill all humans.
We're getting closer as some AI now only want to nuke urban centres only..
That's easy. What has popular science fiction always thought AI would do?
There you go. It takes on that behavior because that's what our literature and pop culture say an AI would do. That's a repeated pattern in the training data of everything people have written down over the years plus what idiots on the internet say en masse.
People really need to learn the basics of how this technology works if they want to continue to opine about it.
You can already see how it will turn out by looking how stuff like ChatGpt has turned out…
It will be absolutely filled with modern, woke, shitbag leftist ideology.
Your title is overstating your case. If putting AI development under the complete control of the government is a crippling handicap, what do you think China will be doing? China, the country where tech companies like Tencent are 10% commissars? The decision would stifle innovation, but not so much that a nation of plagiarists are going to take the lead.
The kinds of people running the Chinese government don't seem to be sitting around trying to undermine their own natural population, especially compared to the US. Many of the major tech companies are overrun with Leftists who hate America, hate the native White population, and want to turn society on its head on the off chance they get to be in charge of it afterward.
All China has to do is not implode before America does, and encourage an AI that gives factual answers about race, mathematics, and technology, and they'll be miles ahead by default.
China is largely behind amplifying our leftists who hate America and the native White population and supporting ESG while banning it at home.
They're nvolved in that but you know who is actually the main driving force behind that.
"Never interrupt the enemy when they are making a mistake" is basically China's policy on the cultural decay in America.
There is a ton of great AI research and open source models coming out of China. The models from what I’ve seen are usually quite uncensored, at least when inference is run in English. Tencent just released a text to video model that would make Trust and Safety departments in the West piss their pants.
Even if we don’t need to be extremely worried about China, I think it’s probably good to act as though we do. Competition spurs innovation, but security breeds complacency.
China's government wants things to be better for Chinese people, America's government (for the next month and a half) wants things to be worse for white people.
His claim (which I don't buy) is that the Secrets Act which allowed the feds seize Tesla's technology is being used to hinder fundamental science instruction. This is claimed by the types of people who say "cold fusion" is being hidden, or that String Theory is a psyop to spoil physics. They will point out that multiple textbook companies are all controlled by a single entity that determines what gets widely taught for political reasons.
All companies in China are part of the CCP, but it doesn't seem like they are trying to keep tech like AI secret. I doubt they hold any new fundamental math or algorithms we don't, but they are doing a good job at optimizing and creating new models.
I'm more curious as to why Elon reposted it. Is he just stoned tweeting or is there a hidden message about something he actually knows. (perhaps about OpenAI's relationship to Microsoft and the government)
I would rather have a competent population that is able to function and innovate without the help of AI
AI is a tool. This is like advocating for a society that can get along just fine without electricity.
Nice. They gonna try to make the US even more like China's walled off internet. Guaranteeing we lose the competition in many sectors.
Chris Martenson at Peak Prosperity piqued my curiosity about the power and energy demands of AI. In Ireland, at a time with energy bills rocketing for the average citizen, datacentres now consume 21% of all electricity output, surpassing the amount consumed by urban households. Zuckerberg's AI datacentre concepts supposedly would require several new nuclear power stations to operate.
I wonder if part of the reason the average person is being psyopped into accepting a lower standard of living - as dictated by climate alarmism and carbon neutral goals etc - is to reserve all this extra power for AI systems. And since limits on energy restrict how many serious AI competitors can even exist within the industry, the govt wants the only ones in existence to be its own controlled and weaponised pets.
The Biden administration is merely a viceroy of the Beijing politburo.
Right, the 'Beijing' politburo.