How women vote
(media.kotakuinaction2.win)
Comments (48)
sorted by:
Abortion is the last off-ramp in a highway full of off-ramps before women are forced to take responsibility of a child, and only because throwing the baby in a dumpster or in a river is a faux pas in current year.
As women are biologically incapable of accepting responsibility, it's no wonder they worship abortion like a golden calf.
It's not though.
After they give birth, they can leave it at any safe haven (church, hospital, fire department, etc) and walk away cleanly.
They're worried about the effect pregnancy has on their party lifestyle and Chad's willingness to rearrange their insides.
Then why do so many of them want late stage abortions(not that they use them but just the right for it)? Was curious how the current state of abortion rights are in America at least but most of the western world has it at 3 months and some a bit later. States like Michigan in America allow it during the WHOLE pregnancy which is insane to me. Anyways, if they actually wanted to take charge of their party lifestyle they'd get plan B, use condoms etc. Women just don't give a fuck that a child growing in their body has bodily autonomy, too.
They are (rightly) afraid of slippery slope and the directionality of public perception.
If we can get late term made illegal then there are sympathetic edge cases that could be used to push for more restrictions.
It comes down to the idea that there are considerations other than a woman's whims. Women hate that idea.
I don’t think most women really want the later term abortions. Their feeble minds have just been brainwashed into thinking that not allowing you to destroy a 8 month old fetus is somehow persecuting them and they should stand up for their bodily rights
It’s all fucking stupid but somehow majority of women absorb TikTok brain rot and think they have a right to kill another human being
I'd hope most women don't want a late term abortion. It's already fucked up and I'm more pro life than pro choice on the matter. I don't think it's tiktok brain rot only, it's feminism that has told them this is a right you have to 100% defend even if it's morally reprehensible. If there was no feminism there would be less abortions.
Woman have been doing things like this long before tik tok though. They are just more susceptible to this kind of propaganda.
A degenerate woman wants the option to kill the baby at any point in case it would inconvinience her shall her financial situation or mood change.
Or she wants the option to punish the father by killing his child. Up to birth. This includes killing a baby that is viable outside her. Which is unambiguous murder for anyone with a functional brain.
You can argue that ''no one is entitled to squat inside someone else'' and if removing that person kills them, ''so be it''. You can't honestly argue it is acceptable to kill the baby when it would be alive if taken out properly.
For some reason they are more comfortable with the idea of killing a baby than putting it up for adoption.
No, not really. Just American women captured by Leftist narrative.
Abortion isn't even a major issue in the rest of the world because it was not heavily politicized by an activist court. European countries talk about American abortion law more than our own.
Meanwhile, in France, mass migration has been successfully framed as a woman's safety issue. The gender divides in other countries are less pronounced than in the US, because the Left in America has been desperately grooming women as political weapons for decades. Abortion is the 8th most significant issue for Americans, including women. Primary issue is rising costs.
Sadly, if you talk to Zoomers anywhere in the world, a sizable chunk of them sound like American women thanks to growing up on screens.
Kids scroll through enough videos of people spreading hate and misinformation about Trump they’ll eventually start to believe that their mom and dad are actually “evil” for supporting him.
Democrats have the perfect brainwash system thanks to social media. They used to have to actually put forth their own bullshit in a controlled setting but now they can say whatever they want and 90% of the TikTok audience or redditors will spend their own time to indoctrinate idiots or naive people absolutely free of charge. Look at Reddit pre-2016 to now. Social media has been the most effective brainwashing tool ever conceived and ever since then we’ve been on a sharp decline to the point that this election is genuinely normal people vs mindless drones and I’m a little concerned for the future.
Yeah, sadly. It's not as bad as if the kids were indoctrinated in some democratic stronghold, but I still see a lot of this shit in Europe and the Middle East just because the kids grow up on their phones and parents do not understand the danger so do nothing to prevent it.
Where'd you pull that from? No way it's true for liberal women.
For Americans in general which includes women as part of the statistic.
It's just a statistic I've seen over the past couple of weeks from different sources. For the population as a whole, it never rises past 5.
I think the last statistic I saw for women it still wasn't in the top 3. Cost of living still absolutely dominates every demographic. Women and the middle & upper-middle class still think that Harris would be better at reducing the cost of living.
So where's the source?
What are you, a redditor? I'm not going to go back through 2 or 3 weeks of videos about polling data and see if I can find a source that appeared for 5 minutes.
All I can tell you is to watch legitimate videos on political and polling analysis, and you'll find that Abortion is not a top issue in the US for people who have been polled. This isn't an abnormal statement, it's been obvious to most pollsters for months.
I was surprised by the statistic so wanted to look at the data. If you don't have it, fine.
Okay, well, I'm sorry for snapping at you.
All good. I could have asked in a nicer way.
This is why women can't be trusted in any position of power. They're selfish beyond belief, and the concept of "greater good" doesn't exist, unless they believe "the things I want" are a greater good.
I fear this country will fall apart before we collectively decide the 19th was a mistake and repeal it.
The regressive left love to use monte and bailey tactics to defend unregulated abortion, effectively saying "it's a women's right to abort for literally no reason whatsoever, also if you do not support this then women are going to get killed by failed pregnancies because doctors are too stupid to diagnose them.".
Part of me feels for these women. I can kind of side with them thinking about how their baby dies with all those convicted criminals running around illegally from other countries.
They could stop the illegal entry of criminals into the country which will eventually kills their baby, but that'd make the a bigot or something. Better if they just save the child the shame of the rape, torture and eventual murder if they deal with it early themselves.
Women are more suspectible to societal pressure (or what they perceive as societal norms). And men are suspectible to simping. Thus you have a downward spiral of doom that will only stop once things get so bad that people are forced to become extremely violent just to survive.
Democracy is a sham. It's a system designed to fool you to make you a drooling idiot. You could blame women for voting the wrong way but that's not the reason why were in this situation. People being retarded is. Both genders.
Just look at covid, the die hards were women
To be honest I'm not sure if I met more female or male covid hoax retards. Perhaps there were more women but that psychosis was universal.
It was universal but the lds sub back then had articles showing women were more likely to follow covid regulations cause of safetyism
That's why I said women are more suspectible to societal pressure. Men are on average better at dealing with being ostracized by the group or at least more willing to be in that situation. But looking back the demonstrations I attended I think it was more or less evenly split between men and women.
Because men can be thrown into the wilderness and manage to survive. In fact, that's what most of our hunter-gatherer ancestors did when the boys became of age and the tribe got too crowded.
I know what you're trying to say but that is definitely not the case for most men. The average man will survive significantly longer in the wilderness than the average woman but in our current times the average man is not capable of going inna woods and surviving for a long period of time. Surviving the wilderness is significantly more difficult than many people believe. If you don't learn the necessary skills beforehand you most likely will not survive.
The reason why men are better at dealing with being ostracized is because of 1) men are less emotional than women and 2) the way society treats men. Society still has the same demands of men and treats them accordingly while it dropped its demand of women but holds them in an even higher regard than before. Our societal structure is completely out of balance.
For a very hilarious modern example of this, everyone can go watch the 'Man vs Women' season of The Island with Bear Gryllis.
Women are also more likely to be midwits, which probably contributes to that susceptibility. They have a very narrow bell curve for intelligence while men have a high risk, high reward one with more people on both tails of the curve.
Retards aside (Because that's all we are) the strongest in any situation will be the one that eats and procreates.
It doesn't matter if their offspring is retarded or improved, that's all they'll have for continuing their seed.
That offspring is going to eventually meet another who they will either reproduce with and continue or be wiped out by.
External events wipe out lots of these creature in a variety of different ways everywhere they travel to but still the strongest in any situation afterwards will be the one that eats and procreates.
Some of the creatures group up for safety and efficiency. The groups prosper well and continue the earlier iterations idea of expansion or ending as long as there is food and a means of procreating.
These groups start to have differing rules as how best to operate. Th strongest flourish and the weakest disappear.
What the US (And most of the West) has now is a weak group which doesn't procreate and a whole bunch of other groups which are hungry and want to continue their seed looking to feast on those resources.
Either the US (And most of the West) survive and continue on as before or it ends.
Democracy either works or it is a system which is only good to a certain point at which it fails and is replaced by something better.
That's the situation and there's nothing more to it (To my mind at least). Sit back and wait it out or dive in and flourish.
This is why the US was never meant to be a democracy, and the warped corrupted fuck of the modern day is not the original system, which wasn't anywhere close to universal democracy.
Those are not the only two options. What if, it was always shite?
What if it were entirely a more flawed system in terms of governance but one which inherently allows the elites to pitch the public against one another, blame each other for all the failures of the gov, and make the public think there is hope and waste time on a futile endeavour, fighting other members of the public.
That's a simple divide and conquer technique but placed within your own people as oppose to an enemy which will be absorbed by the superior group.
It is at these times where the superior system kicks in. Either democracy works and the governing means of that system is radically altered, an eternal force with better governance overthrows that body or the entire species just dies out.
Either the democratically elected governance is not working properly or it has been infected by a better external system which is purposefully degrading it for annihilation and absorption for its own growth or it is just the end of the line.
As I'm ever the optimist in these situations I'd say that the body is reclaimed with new leadership or accepts that it's lost and regroups elsewhere and re-enters while the new entity is trying to feed and procreate in its former territory.
Chances are high that something will continue to pass its seed along and so it is just a matter of whether you will be in that process or not.
Bit of a sidebar here, but I detest appeals to “muh elites divide and conquer”. The implication is that we would all be getting along in the absence of the elites, as if there are no meaningful and irrevocable differences between groups of people. In reality, only very homogenous societies have any hope of long term peace and prosperity. Multiculturalism is always doomed to strife.
What the elites have done is force multiculturalism on the west. So yes, the elites are largely responsible for the fighting. But the wolves don’t magically become your friends just because you’ve removed the people who let them in.
Sidebars are my favourite!
Going by the model presented as the example, there would eventually be a large homogenous group which has fragments of the best elements of all the group which it superseded. Certain aspects of the many prior cultures which make up that centred society around that group would be there to learn from, adapt from and strive from.
The biggest threats to that group (Outside of environmental changes) would be other groups of that size (Or bigger) or a tiny element which is completely new and unaccounted for in the entire heritage of what had made up the group.
This tiny element is sometimes thought of as a virus which causes the group's demise. In cultural anthropology the concept of a meme pathogen bringing down a civilisation is far less likely than another group doing so. But in theory it is possible.
Either the elites get it right and society will continue without evolving or ideas will get into the system and alter what the elite group does to continue controlling it.
This is all just an example for purpose though. I'm sure there are many factors missing which we can't account for yet. I'm just suggesting that the 'divide and conquer' could either be an external factor or an internal one as it has always worked as a form of attack for the largest groups in the West.
It's why the first move of the subversives was to give women power. Once they had that the subversives could achieve anything they wanted.
That was far from being the first move. Taking over finance and media was the beginning.
The suffrage movement predated that.
You think they waited with taking over finance and media till the 20th century?
Lol they're not worried about their kids being killed by illegal aliens, they're worried about giving birth to toxic racist huwite males who will oppress the poor minorities
They should just have sex with the illegals then and get them citizenship.
That would solve everyone's problems.
They could have sex with an illegal, then get pregnant, then get murdered by the illegal.
That's quite likely but, going by their own reasoning decisions, their body - their choice.
they are
Well, it seems that the strongest group will continue then.