How women vote
(media.kotakuinaction2.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (48)
sorted by:
They're worried about the effect pregnancy has on their party lifestyle and Chad's willingness to rearrange their insides.
Then why do so many of them want late stage abortions(not that they use them but just the right for it)? Was curious how the current state of abortion rights are in America at least but most of the western world has it at 3 months and some a bit later. States like Michigan in America allow it during the WHOLE pregnancy which is insane to me. Anyways, if they actually wanted to take charge of their party lifestyle they'd get plan B, use condoms etc. Women just don't give a fuck that a child growing in their body has bodily autonomy, too.
They are (rightly) afraid of slippery slope and the directionality of public perception.
If we can get late term made illegal then there are sympathetic edge cases that could be used to push for more restrictions.
It comes down to the idea that there are considerations other than a woman's whims. Women hate that idea.
I don’t think most women really want the later term abortions. Their feeble minds have just been brainwashed into thinking that not allowing you to destroy a 8 month old fetus is somehow persecuting them and they should stand up for their bodily rights
It’s all fucking stupid but somehow majority of women absorb TikTok brain rot and think they have a right to kill another human being
I'd hope most women don't want a late term abortion. It's already fucked up and I'm more pro life than pro choice on the matter. I don't think it's tiktok brain rot only, it's feminism that has told them this is a right you have to 100% defend even if it's morally reprehensible. If there was no feminism there would be less abortions.
Woman have been doing things like this long before tik tok though. They are just more susceptible to this kind of propaganda.
A degenerate woman wants the option to kill the baby at any point in case it would inconvinience her shall her financial situation or mood change.
Or she wants the option to punish the father by killing his child. Up to birth. This includes killing a baby that is viable outside her. Which is unambiguous murder for anyone with a functional brain.
You can argue that ''no one is entitled to squat inside someone else'' and if removing that person kills them, ''so be it''. You can't honestly argue it is acceptable to kill the baby when it would be alive if taken out properly.
For some reason they are more comfortable with the idea of killing a baby than putting it up for adoption.