How women vote
(media.kotakuinaction2.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (48)
sorted by:
Women are more suspectible to societal pressure (or what they perceive as societal norms). And men are suspectible to simping. Thus you have a downward spiral of doom that will only stop once things get so bad that people are forced to become extremely violent just to survive.
Democracy is a sham. It's a system designed to fool you to make you a drooling idiot. You could blame women for voting the wrong way but that's not the reason why were in this situation. People being retarded is. Both genders.
Just look at covid, the die hards were women
To be honest I'm not sure if I met more female or male covid hoax retards. Perhaps there were more women but that psychosis was universal.
It was universal but the lds sub back then had articles showing women were more likely to follow covid regulations cause of safetyism
That's why I said women are more suspectible to societal pressure. Men are on average better at dealing with being ostracized by the group or at least more willing to be in that situation. But looking back the demonstrations I attended I think it was more or less evenly split between men and women.
Women are also more likely to be midwits, which probably contributes to that susceptibility. They have a very narrow bell curve for intelligence while men have a high risk, high reward one with more people on both tails of the curve.
This is why the US was never meant to be a democracy, and the warped corrupted fuck of the modern day is not the original system, which wasn't anywhere close to universal democracy.
Those are not the only two options. What if, it was always shite?
What if it were entirely a more flawed system in terms of governance but one which inherently allows the elites to pitch the public against one another, blame each other for all the failures of the gov, and make the public think there is hope and waste time on a futile endeavour, fighting other members of the public.
Bit of a sidebar here, but I detest appeals to “muh elites divide and conquer”. The implication is that we would all be getting along in the absence of the elites, as if there are no meaningful and irrevocable differences between groups of people. In reality, only very homogenous societies have any hope of long term peace and prosperity. Multiculturalism is always doomed to strife.
What the elites have done is force multiculturalism on the west. So yes, the elites are largely responsible for the fighting. But the wolves don’t magically become your friends just because you’ve removed the people who let them in.
It's why the first move of the subversives was to give women power. Once they had that the subversives could achieve anything they wanted.
That was far from being the first move. Taking over finance and media was the beginning.
The suffrage movement predated that.
You think they waited with taking over finance and media till the 20th century?