It's kind of telling that he routinely denies the six gorillions with no ill effect (other than that one time years ago they froze his assets, then...nothing happened?) But Alex Jones was sued to the tune of a billion for questioning Sandy Hook.
Fuentes is exactly like that though. He is a literal meme of a Mexican mutt short guy jerking off to femboys while screaming about how Jews bad and women evil.
He is a literal caricature of every negative stereotype about the alt-right you can think of.
There's been a propaganda strategy shift in the last 6 or so years that understands memetic transfer and tries to prevent the spread of ones they don't like with pre-exposure, much like how a [real] vaccine would prime your immune response with a weakened virus.
Attach the good point to something that makes normies recoil and the normies then get primed to recoil from the good point alone. It's the time-honored "poisoning the well" trick but with an extra payload to poison things outside of it.
Until now I never had a huge problem with him either like some people. There's lots of reasons not to like Trump, and it's legitimate politicking to try and push the culture towards your point of view, then convince politicians to make gestures to your movement if they want your support.
At some point you do need to recognize you've gotten all the concessions you'll get for this cycle, and lock in your political capital until the next - if you don't, people will question what your real goal is.
If good points were at all convincing to normies, they'd already be convinced. They're exceptionally good at ignoring the obvious if it maintains their social standing.
The constant spamming of low IQ racial collectivism is a fed op. Trying to slide the right into adopting leftist ideology is the point, for multiple reasons. Internally it derails actual right wing organization. Externally the goal is to destroy the image of the right and reinforce the horseshoe theory propaganda that is used to keep people from understanding reality.
The point of horseshoe theory is to both inprove the image of the left by claiming that the german socialists were right wing, when in reality all of WW2 was leftist power struggling. And also to make people who wpupd lean right believe the lie that both political sides are actually the same and there is no point in getting involved, when the real left and right are fundamentally different, and it is very obvious that leftism is evil.
Yes, and it doesn't matter if they're dual citizens in little hats or sad aging alky fucks with bad quality swastika tattoos (who the Reich would've sentenced to hard labor anyhow if they were around in those days).
All collectivist leftists deserve the rope. "But this other group is doing thing you said is bad" yes, and they are retarded leftists. "We should also do it". No.
Go "reeee joos" at someone else faggot. I don't care. They're not special.
Racial collectivism isn't just stupid, it's actually more stupid than ethnic collectivism.
The only critique I would make to your analysis is that there is no "right". Ever since the term was defined among the anti-Jacobian coalition in the French Revolution, all it ever meant was "not among the Leftists".
There is only a Left and an Anti-Left. There is no other mechanism that would align militarists, theocrats, ancaps, monarchists, and classical liberals beyond that.
Collectivism is an evolutionary adaptation for survival. If you need it spelled out for you then you're really too dense to be opining on the subject and just have a suicidal moral framework.
The only objective left right measure is the scale of government control, not the cultural flavoring. The far ends of the scale are anarchist as extreme right, and totalitarian as extreme left.
How are you defining ethnicity that it's noticeably different from race? Or are you going by the absurdly overgeneralized definition of "race" the wehraboos pretend to use? Where they mash a third of the globe into some generic "white".
"Hello Fellow White Patriots! Have you heard the good word of Adolf Hitler? He was a true American hero! We must collectively organize as racial advocates of Social National Justice. Most importantly, we must do it public gatherings, wearing uniforms, in front of cameras, in homogenously democratic cities. Everything every Democrat has ever said about us is right, and that's a good thing!"
So you're describing behavior that doesn't describe what I've seen from Fuentes, and I agree that that the behavior you've described is 100% fed-speak.
Which is why he comes off as more of a troll to me than a fed.
Meanwhile Trump is saying prayers at the grave of a rabbi who claimed goyim exist to serve jews. Lol.
I think Trump represents putting your head in the sand on both sides. He's like 80 years old and did nothing the last four years. But supposedly he will change things or something this time.
2 more weeks of political theater goys! Red jew or blue jew?
Today's chapter in "Nick is a federal asset"
Honestly can't tell if he's been "activated" because the establishment is scared of a Trump win, or he's just a lolcow.
I'm leaning on the more believable 'he's an attention seeking idiot with not much talent so this grift is how he gets attention' side of things.
He would be making at least as much money, likely a lot more, riding the Trump wave. Right wing media is as profitable as Fox News right now.
But not as MUCH attention, he'd rather get less money but more attention.
I don't think he's a federal asset. He talks about the "JQ" way too much for that.
I think he's mostly a troll.
Dude like a quarter of all KKK-type organizations are feds lol. Have been for decades.
It's kind of telling that he routinely denies the six gorillions with no ill effect (other than that one time years ago they froze his assets, then...nothing happened?) But Alex Jones was sued to the tune of a billion for questioning Sandy Hook.
Nah, flip that, less than a quarter of them are serious retards, the rest are feds or globalists.
Endlessly bringing up the JQ is a classic Fed tactic, because they know there's nothing more toxic in terms of optics from a normie perspective.
Exactly this, they can't silence it completely so they have it coming out of the mouths of the worst possible spergs.
Classic well poisoning.
Feds don't bring up good points. They act as a racist caricature cartoon to serve as an example of "wow, don't be like that crazy guy."
I don't follow him, but from what I have seen, Fuentes doesn't strike me as that.
Fuentes is exactly like that though. He is a literal meme of a Mexican mutt short guy jerking off to femboys while screaming about how Jews bad and women evil.
He is a literal caricature of every negative stereotype about the alt-right you can think of.
There's been a propaganda strategy shift in the last 6 or so years that understands memetic transfer and tries to prevent the spread of ones they don't like with pre-exposure, much like how a [real] vaccine would prime your immune response with a weakened virus.
Attach the good point to something that makes normies recoil and the normies then get primed to recoil from the good point alone. It's the time-honored "poisoning the well" trick but with an extra payload to poison things outside of it.
Until now I never had a huge problem with him either like some people. There's lots of reasons not to like Trump, and it's legitimate politicking to try and push the culture towards your point of view, then convince politicians to make gestures to your movement if they want your support.
At some point you do need to recognize you've gotten all the concessions you'll get for this cycle, and lock in your political capital until the next - if you don't, people will question what your real goal is.
If good points were at all convincing to normies, they'd already be convinced. They're exceptionally good at ignoring the obvious if it maintains their social standing.
The constant spamming of low IQ racial collectivism is a fed op. Trying to slide the right into adopting leftist ideology is the point, for multiple reasons. Internally it derails actual right wing organization. Externally the goal is to destroy the image of the right and reinforce the horseshoe theory propaganda that is used to keep people from understanding reality.
The point of horseshoe theory is to both inprove the image of the left by claiming that the german socialists were right wing, when in reality all of WW2 was leftist power struggling. And also to make people who wpupd lean right believe the lie that both political sides are actually the same and there is no point in getting involved, when the real left and right are fundamentally different, and it is very obvious that leftism is evil.
Are groups who think they are "God's chosen people" following a collectivist ideology?
Historically, when people believe they have the Will of God, they commit atrocities as a group, sometimes with someone leading them, yes.
Yes, and it doesn't matter if they're dual citizens in little hats or sad aging alky fucks with bad quality swastika tattoos (who the Reich would've sentenced to hard labor anyhow if they were around in those days).
That is called a religion.
All collectivist leftists deserve the rope. "But this other group is doing thing you said is bad" yes, and they are retarded leftists. "We should also do it". No.
Go "reeee joos" at someone else faggot. I don't care. They're not special.
Racial collectivism isn't just stupid, it's actually more stupid than ethnic collectivism.
The only critique I would make to your analysis is that there is no "right". Ever since the term was defined among the anti-Jacobian coalition in the French Revolution, all it ever meant was "not among the Leftists".
There is only a Left and an Anti-Left. There is no other mechanism that would align militarists, theocrats, ancaps, monarchists, and classical liberals beyond that.
Collectivism is an evolutionary adaptation for survival. If you need it spelled out for you then you're really too dense to be opining on the subject and just have a suicidal moral framework.
The only objective left right measure is the scale of government control, not the cultural flavoring. The far ends of the scale are anarchist as extreme right, and totalitarian as extreme left.
How are you defining ethnicity that it's noticeably different from race? Or are you going by the absurdly overgeneralized definition of "race" the wehraboos pretend to use? Where they mash a third of the globe into some generic "white".
Literally a leading topic among feds.
"Hello Fellow White Patriots! Have you heard the good word of Adolf Hitler? He was a true American hero! We must collectively organize as racial advocates of Social National Justice. Most importantly, we must do it public gatherings, wearing uniforms, in front of cameras, in homogenously democratic cities. Everything every Democrat has ever said about us is right, and that's a good thing!"
So you're describing behavior that doesn't describe what I've seen from Fuentes, and I agree that that the behavior you've described is 100% fed-speak.
Which is why he comes off as more of a troll to me than a fed.
Meanwhile Trump is saying prayers at the grave of a rabbi who claimed goyim exist to serve jews. Lol.
I think Trump represents putting your head in the sand on both sides. He's like 80 years old and did nothing the last four years. But supposedly he will change things or something this time.
2 more weeks of political theater goys! Red jew or blue jew?
There's always Jill Stein, who is anti-Israel. But something tells me that you will like her even less.
It is IMPOSSIBLE to get any significant power in this country without pandering to Jews.
Trump will not broadcast the JQ far and wide, but he actually cares about Americans, and that's good enough to get my vote just by itself.
Sure he does
I wish there was a politician in Europe who cared about Europeans.
Viktor Orban's about the closest.
Exactly he is fellating jews for personal power. He will represent those who give him power, not some magatard fatty loser.
His actions show otherwise