Criticizing women to be made a terrorist offense in the UK
(www.telegraph.co.uk)
Comments (48)
sorted by:
I know it SAYS extreme misogyny.
But the UK has seen a man get jailed for 18 months for shouting “who the fuck is alllah?”
So what these laws say and how they are actually applied varies DRAMATICALLY.
If you read the article, you merely have to consume content from Andrew Tate to be considered a radicalised extremist. Even being a single adult male for a long time (ie. someone who claims the Single Occupancy Discount for a period of time) could end up being referred to Prevent.
They're just so fucking brazen. I know it's often repeated here that pointing out their hypocrisy won't work because they don't care that they're hypocrites, or that you can't be a hypocrite if you have no principles to betray in the first place.
But it's way worse than even that. Hypocrisy is power, it's domination. They're not just shameless hypocrites, they're proud hypocrites, they actually love being the most audacious sanctimonious hypocritical pieces of shit because it's really just about rubbing it in your face.
They know that you know that they know that you know that they know they're hypocrites, and their hatred for you knows no bounds.
They didn't even bother backing it up with any bullshit statistics.
Only "a woman was murdered once!"
"Terrorism!"
But they'll ignore the fact that men are actually more likely victims of violent crime. Or what about the women raped and murdered by muslims? I bet that doesn't count either
They're going after Andrew Tate. They're also going to go after the manosphere, incels, MGTOW, anti-feminism and the lifestyle choice of bachelorhood. Lumping them all in as "extreme". In effect, your position in society and whether you are deemed worthy of liberty will be deemed by how women see you if this proposal becomes law. If you ain't married, co-habiting (common law married) or slaying on the dating apps, you should be concerned for the future.
Being an adult male without a girlfriend for a longer than normal period of time will now be seen as radicalised extremism by the UK Government. Dating apps, already facing the prospect of having to screen out men for online safety now also face being told to report individual men who make women feel creeped out, offended or rejected by any of them to Prevent or the Police.
I did warn come September, you ain't seen nothing yet. They're using the recent unrest to bring in draconian laws to shut down groups they despise such as the far-right and bachelors.
ETA: Archive (now Archive Today will finally load): https://archive.ph/ymUxn
I can't wait for the new "The worst she can say is 'no'" memes with men getting arrested for their bad pick-up lines on Bumble and Tinder.
Ironically, one of the things that radio commentators were asking for was for the state to intervene in unattractive men (a.k.a. "creeps") asking out women, approaching women or being in the presence of women in a public place.
We know of the "halo effect" where attractive individuals get preferential treatment and can get away with much more compared to their unattractive peers. Ultimately what they are asking for is the removal of unattractive men from society under the belief their existence incites terror and therefore can be classed as (extreme) misogyny.
The other thing they called for is the abolition of pornography as you'd expect from such commentators on both sides of the political spectrum.
So we have a society that denounces men for not approaching women under the slogan of "you miss 100% of the shots you don't make" while denouncing men for approaching women if they are don't meet attractiveness and social status. We're going to create more radicalised single men in the same way that jailing anyone deemed "far right" will radicalise them.
They have a problem with "extreme misogyny"? What a shameful display of their islamophobia.
If you're not on the side of sex slavery, polygamy, wife beating, marital rape, child brides and no girls in school, then you're on the wrong side of history.
From the country that told a British woman she had no case to answer for when she forced a man to have sex with her despite him clearly refusing consent.
Not a chance this is to be used against the muzzies
Indeed you are on the wrong side of history if you aren't for these time proven good things.
They are going to end up labeling everything under the sun as terrorists except for the actual terrorists invading and killing UK.
That’s always “lone man with mental health issues despite the fact that he had a manifesto explaining his reasons which is banned from speculating about”
and this will go the same way as stop Asian hate once they find who they arrest for it
I remember they had to stop posting videos of Asians being attacked.
Reddit’s videos implemented a policy saying “we don’t allow violent videos with blacks the perpetrators”
CrazyFuckingVideos
But I identify as Muslim, checkmate atheists!
Imp is probably bouncing off the walls because he wasn't able to rant about this one. I miss the little guy.
he shouldn't be fine.
Apparently he’s a 6’7 lanklet
TIL we have deep lore on Imp.
He's still screeching on the other boards if you wanna check up on him
He was celebrating a woman getting arrested for being critical of immigration and getting the Rwandan guy's name wrong over on c/feminism.
Imp will celebrate hundreds of men dying if it inconveniences a woman in the process.
Muslims are right about women.. i guess. Lawl.
Why not let them expose themselves for who they are?
They chose their path in life
I don't want to fix shit. We all self select our path. We cannot force someone to be moral, God fearing people. Would you rather find out you married a whore after you're married?
Stop doing shit that makes men want to hate you then!
Could be difficult as "tackling violence against women and girls" in the UK is already considered a terrorist offence
I want to tack a rider onto this proposed law:
"If you even think about looking at a man, for any reason, whatsoever, good or bad, you will be fined 5 pounds per second for every second you looked at him. If a man chose to get into your line of vision, it's still also your fault somehow, and you will have to pay the fine to him immediately for every second you looked at him. You don't even have to make eye contact, just simply looking, or thinking of looking, or thinking of a man in any way at all."
This oughta cover it. Let me know how absolutely retarded that sounds, because that's what women want, but for them. Unironically.
A ray of sunshine, it'll be ignored and botched then.
Remember this is all happening because a service police officer took a day off dancing at a pride parade to kill someone.
Wait so what about those women who got arrested for criticising the government? Wouldn't the government be committing terrorism then!? Oh shit, they are finally admitting that the government of the UK is the enemy of the people!
Stop feeding or doing anything for crazy people, politicians, police and their minions.
Modern problems require old school solutions.
Guess only way to not end up in prison in the UK is to avoid using the most popular social media if you have any none extreme leftwing views or use a vpn. Or better just move away from there. At this point even japan with their ridiculous work hours seems like a better alternative.
Imagine being locked up longer for calling a cunt a cunt than an Arab migrant raping a young girl.
I'm so fucking glad my Grandpa took his family and left the UK in the 60's
They’re not really worried about incels. They’re worried about volcels.