The fact that they insisted on everyone getting injections regularly does indicate that over time the mystery substance is broken down and diluted. Granted the bluetooth signals from those graves show that the stuff can "survive" human decomposition, but then those were people who died soon after getting injected. Whereas if you live long enough after your last shot, the affected cells will presumably have been disposed of by the body, which is, again, probably why they want people to keep getting regular "boosters."
Been awhile since I heard about those, during the scamdemic it went around that people who got the clot shot were giving off signals that could be picked up by Bluetooth. I worked with some guys who got the shot but never checked myself.
Everything at the level of molecular biology looks like some space age nanotech stuff. The mRNA shots def have real dangers, don't get me wrong, but proteins are wiggling all the time, so some vaguely wormlike protein doesn't indicate much on its own.
Again, yes, of course. But this still isn't some exotic sci-fi tech. Proteins chaining (and folding) themselves into even more complex structures is just what they do by their very nature, and when this process malfunctions, like in the case of prions, the results are catastrophic.
However this is way more likely to be the inadvertant result of screwing around with RNA rather than nano-engineering that should be at least a few decades away if we're being optimistic. Forcing people to take an experimental medical treatment knowing that everyone who takes it is a lab rat while claiming a level of certainty regarding its safety that's simply not possible to know prior to pushing it onto everyone is already a crime against humanity, no need to make such wild extrapolations.
I'm confused as to how you're the same account saying this and also talking about bluetooth signals coming from the graves of people who had the shot elsewhere in the thread. There's a disconnect here that I'm not understanding.
I'm referencing a video clip from the OP. No idea if there's anything to that clip or it's BS, but I'm taking it at face-value for the sake of argument.
What, you don't believe that they mastered nanorobotics, something that would literally usher in a new "age" of technology, and rather than use it to make a quadrillion dollars, they used it instead only just to give a relatively very small number of random liberals death clots in their 30s and 40s?
Also we've seen this shit before, random dudes from suspiciously-bullshit sounding 'institutions' coming up with fantastical OMG BREAKING BOMBSHELL stories about the vaccine.
My favorite was the guy showing pictures of algae.
That was an entire scenario in Plague Inc and its various predecessors. Multiple even in Plague Inc itself, with the brain worm one able to do various dystopias (including a Santa worship one).
Source pedantry is a dangerous game, used by both progressives and elites to discredit information that isn't Officially Approved™ but I don't buy this source.
"If it was real, it'd have been reported elsewhere" is a fallacy, because we've seen how the powers that be clamp down on information they don't like, and how supposed authorities meekly (or maliciously) play along... but I would have expected Died Suddenly's previous allegations to have been backed up in some way by now.
They also concluded in the study their suspicion that these smart microscopic components are part of the elite’s “long-planned well-funded Internet of Bodies,” which was described as a kind of “synthetic global central nervous system” turning humans into controllable “Biohybrid Magnetic Robots.”
This is not a scientific conclusion. Studies are about data, and sometimes conclusions call for a degree of speculation but this certainly is not within the purview of a scientific study. It's a huge leap from data to conclusion. Even assuming they are 100% honest about their actual findings, this conclusion reveals a huge ideological bias.
To be clear, I wouldn't put anything past the makers and pushes of the vaccine. This, however, doesn't ring true. I'm not saying no, but I'm not even close to saying yes.
One of the worst paths "our side" can go down is rejecting everything possible just because the Left says/does it, including various ideas like "having a trustable source" or "backing up what you are saying without sounding like a schizo."
Its pretty clearly already happening here to a lot of people. Because the need to virtue signal yourself as the "wokest" person possible (in the original meaning) goes above any desire to help or improve things.
So glad to be pureblood just unfortunate there were many i couldn't convince..
The fact that they insisted on everyone getting injections regularly does indicate that over time the mystery substance is broken down and diluted. Granted the bluetooth signals from those graves show that the stuff can "survive" human decomposition, but then those were people who died soon after getting injected. Whereas if you live long enough after your last shot, the affected cells will presumably have been disposed of by the body, which is, again, probably why they want people to keep getting regular "boosters."
...bluetooth signals?
Been awhile since I heard about those, during the scamdemic it went around that people who got the clot shot were giving off signals that could be picked up by Bluetooth. I worked with some guys who got the shot but never checked myself.
He's schizophrenic.
Perhaps it does, but the only thing it tells me for sure is that they wanted more money.
fuck em
Everything at the level of molecular biology looks like some space age nanotech stuff. The mRNA shots def have real dangers, don't get me wrong, but proteins are wiggling all the time, so some vaguely wormlike protein doesn't indicate much on its own.
if they chain themselves into structures that cause clots, it's a problem.
Again, yes, of course. But this still isn't some exotic sci-fi tech. Proteins chaining (and folding) themselves into even more complex structures is just what they do by their very nature, and when this process malfunctions, like in the case of prions, the results are catastrophic.
However this is way more likely to be the inadvertant result of screwing around with RNA rather than nano-engineering that should be at least a few decades away if we're being optimistic. Forcing people to take an experimental medical treatment knowing that everyone who takes it is a lab rat while claiming a level of certainty regarding its safety that's simply not possible to know prior to pushing it onto everyone is already a crime against humanity, no need to make such wild extrapolations.
I'm confused as to how you're the same account saying this and also talking about bluetooth signals coming from the graves of people who had the shot elsewhere in the thread. There's a disconnect here that I'm not understanding.
I'm referencing a video clip from the OP. No idea if there's anything to that clip or it's BS, but I'm taking it at face-value for the sake of argument.
Agreed. I didn't mean to imply I believed it was purposeful.
What, you don't believe that they mastered nanorobotics, something that would literally usher in a new "age" of technology, and rather than use it to make a quadrillion dollars, they used it instead only just to give a relatively very small number of random liberals death clots in their 30s and 40s?
lol no
"Nanorobots", uh huh.
Also we've seen this shit before, random dudes from suspiciously-bullshit sounding 'institutions' coming up with fantastical OMG BREAKING BOMBSHELL stories about the vaccine.
My favorite was the guy showing pictures of algae.
I swear I have seen horror stories in various media where worm like demons were placed inside people turning them into zombies.
The Faculty
That was an entire scenario in Plague Inc and its various predecessors. Multiple even in Plague Inc itself, with the brain worm one able to do various dystopias (including a Santa worship one).
You're thinking of the original Rec film.
Source pedantry is a dangerous game, used by both progressives and elites to discredit information that isn't Officially Approved™ but I don't buy this source.
"If it was real, it'd have been reported elsewhere" is a fallacy, because we've seen how the powers that be clamp down on information they don't like, and how supposed authorities meekly (or maliciously) play along... but I would have expected Died Suddenly's previous allegations to have been backed up in some way by now.
This is not a scientific conclusion. Studies are about data, and sometimes conclusions call for a degree of speculation but this certainly is not within the purview of a scientific study. It's a huge leap from data to conclusion. Even assuming they are 100% honest about their actual findings, this conclusion reveals a huge ideological bias.
To be clear, I wouldn't put anything past the makers and pushes of the vaccine. This, however, doesn't ring true. I'm not saying no, but I'm not even close to saying yes.
One of the worst paths "our side" can go down is rejecting everything possible just because the Left says/does it, including various ideas like "having a trustable source" or "backing up what you are saying without sounding like a schizo."
Its pretty clearly already happening here to a lot of people. Because the need to virtue signal yourself as the "wokest" person possible (in the original meaning) goes above any desire to help or improve things.
I wish. Nanomachines, son.
aw sweet, man-made horrors beyond my comprehension
Isn't that just the default setting for everything now?
Nano Machines, son!
clutches chest painfully
(The ending to the bottom left video got me. I jumped.)