Wait why was this news? He's a very young man that was forced into the public thanks to activist leftists, only alive today thanks to the 2nd ammendment so that of course is his primary focus.
The fact he'd write in Ron Paul than risk ANY compromised to the 2nd and no mention of EVER supporting Dems says how much of a none issue this is, just needless drama which at most should have the Trump team clarifying their commitment to the 2nd ammendment.
I respect that he made the world a slightly safer place, but all I read from this is he’s genuinely fucking retarded when it comes to politics.
A vote for anyone but Trump might as well be a vote for the Democrats. But Ron Paul of all people? Dude has one foot in the crypt and they just finally got rid of another zombie presidential candidate
To be fair, most of us were fucking retarded when it comes to politics at that age. Even if we were "right" on something things, it was usually for retarded reasons.
I'd like to point out being British that people used this argument in order to get us to vote Conservative and the Conservatives stabbed us in the back, you've been warned. Even if Trump gets in and he's honest there's no guarantee the GOP won't turn on him like last time, don't be a fool.
Of course the GOP will turn on him like they did last time. That's why we vote for MAGA candidates like Gaetz and pillory establishment scum like Lindsey Graham and Mitch McConnel.
We hate the GOP, so we are doing a hostile takeover.
The problem is Trump himself seems to be allergic to throwing support behind MAGA, which is annoying, the criticisms of Trump especially who he surrounds himself with is valid.
The number one best thing for this nation would be to toss the name “Republican” and for Trump to go full Bull Moose and make MAGA an official third party. Practically impossible since leftists don’t want another TDR who actually foils their plans and actually makes the country great again. Modern republicans are nothing more than safety checks for the leftist agenda. Stop the “reach across the aisle” bullshit, they all want me dead because of my sex and race.
The fact the Dems ain't even an option to him shows he may have been slightly retarded in chosing Ron Paul initially which is understandable given his age, he ain't Suicidal to pick a Dem.
Clown show. This was written by a committee and makes him sound like he's under duress.
It would have been easy to say, "My comment was tongue in cheek. I would have loved to have seen a President Ron Paul, but voting Trump in 2024 is the best way to protect our constitutional rights." I'm constantly awed by how badly everyone fucks up this media stuff.
MrBeast showed me that a lot of people out there in the public sphere have extremely shitty and unprofessional support teams behind the scenes. You'd be better off just writing the responses yourself in a lot of cases, then at least you can stand by what you truly mean.
This was written by a committee and makes him sound like he's under duress.
It WAS. He was bullied by Trump nuts and since he can't work a real job ever he's dependent on the right to be able to afford food.
Or he could have said "I stand by my comments that Trump isn't strong enough on 2A but obviously Harris is worse and my write-in vote for Paul won't help 2A rights in this country." because he obviously wasn't being tongue in cheek and it's silly to lie like that.
Well yeah. The first statement was unwise, but he's like twenty, is he not? And after being catapulted into public notoriety for having to defend himself against terrorists, he's likely got quite a few of the wrong kind of people whispering in his ear.
Did his mother and sisters support him during the trial? If not and they sided with BLM, cutting them off completely is more than appropriate, and even remarkably light. I don't know anything about his home life, I don't follow gossip or social media or any of that stuff. But from you saying "mother and sisters" it leads me to believe that maybe his parents are divorced? A single mom and two daughters becoming rabid leftists and being pro-BLM/Antifa during Chimpout Summer is entirely believable. If my mom and sisters sided with the terrorists who tried to murder me for virtue signaling points, and I made it out the other side alive and free, you can be sure as shit I would be cutting them out of my life forever.
I've never heard any mention of Kyle's father being in the picture.
His mother and two now college-aged sisters seem like white, low income normies struggling to get by through working a series of low pay entry-level jobs.
AFAIK they supported him all the way through the trial and suffered emotionally along with him. I've listened to some interviews with them and haven't ever heard any leftist TDS or BLM stuff.
Rittenhouse wrote a book within the last year disclosing some unflattering info about his family such as his mother having a series of deadbeat bfs and his sister failing out of school.
I believe upon reading the manuscript that they asked that he leave some of their personal details out of his book. But Rittenhouse essentially ghosted them and published anyway.
Then I saw a news piece a few months back stating they were getting evicted.
His mother & sisters are adults so Kyle isn't obligated to help them financially.
But the narrative from them I've seen in interviews is that his trial destroyed their lives in Wisconsin/Illinois forcing them to flee. But Kyle has essentially chosen his new circle of handlers and his 15 minutes of fame over his own flesh & blood who are struggling like many Americans and seem like good people.
More than 80% of divorces are initiated by women. So there's a greater than 4 out of 5 chance that it was his mom who left his dad, tearing their family apart. If that is the case, I can definitely see how that would breed some animosity in the only remaining male in a household of all women. I agree his handlers have been leading him astray ever since the trial, but I'm not so quick to assume malice on his part for not sticking with his mom and sisters. That smacks too much of the old "the plight of the poor helpless woman" song and dance, and that tune has run out its welcome long ago. Most women facing a horrible plight have no one but themselves to blame for setting it into motion, and the sob stories are nothing more than yet another attempt at dodging accountability. If we're going to get into choosing something over flesh and blood, I would start with asking whose idea it was to remove his father from his life at a young age.
The bottom line is that one of the most important things a boy can have in his life to keep him from turning into a dipshit is having a good father around. If the father was kicked out of his life entirely, he ended up becoming a dipshit, and that in turn ended up biting his mom in the ass, I'd say it sucks to suck. Shouldn't have kicked the dad out.
Sounds like he was bullied. I’m a huge Ron Paul fan but voting for Trump since he is on the ballot, but if that is what he wants to do he is free to do so. I imagine he was bullied behind the scenes.
Just checked out his wiki page due to another post, and it does appear that his parents divorced while he was young. So we've got a kid raised by a single mom with two sisters. That's already a recipe for getting all the wrong advice in life. I'm honestly shocked he had the values and courage he did on the night of his shooting. Maybe he learned that from his dad during visitations?
But regardless, we've got a boy raised in an all girl household by a single mom, suddenly gets fame thrust upon him while he's barely legally an adult, gets surrounded by grifters and leeches trying to use him to push their brands or raise their own status, is too young, inexperienced, and naive (again, thanks single mom) about life to recognize the hot chick who is suddenly interested in him is nothing but a gold digger.
Sounds to me like he's been tugged around by manipulative people his entire life. First his single mom, then all the people who glommed on during the trial, and then all the clout chasers after he won. And of course winning is going to make it feel like the people who talked like they were on his side are the only people he can rely on, so he ends up taking their advice even more. I would bet he was talked into coming out against Trump, and was talked into walking it back when it started hitting someone's bottom line.
What he should have done was used the direct aftermath to make a decent chunk of money, then drop out of public life entirely while investing that money in his future. Of course, that's the wisdom of age and retrospect, and I can't blame him for making the choice while having neither. He got suckered in by the fame and money while being encouraged to do all the wrong things by all the wrong people just trying to cut a slice off for themselves, and he ends up being a mouthpiece for political entities he doesn't understand. He needs to stop trying to be a public figure honestly. He had his moment, I'm glad he made it out alive and free, and it's time to go do something else. Get off Twitter and stop doing the talkshows and interviews. Take that money and get a few welding and CNC certificates. Maybe in a few years he can work for one of those boutique AR-15 companies. He's not cut out for politics and public life, and never would have had to even think about it if it hadn't been forced upon him. He's still basically a dumb kid like 10 million others, we just happen to know about him because of shit other people tried to do to him.
I'm willing to give him a pass for being a dumb kid led astray by malicious adults and women, so long as he lets it drop here. I'm shocked there are so many on TDW that are frothy mouth with rage over a fucking Tweet about not supporting Trump. It really does drive home the point that there are useful idiots on both sides, and that it's actually what most people are regardless of their politics. People who don't do a whole lot of thinking, don't self-reflect, don't try to step back and calm their emotions and analyze what they believe and why, and act almost entirely off of emotional reactions. The ones on our side just happened to be pushed by their emotions into supporting the correct things, but they didn't think themselves into these positions, they feel them and don't go much further than that. So another stimulus can set off their emotions in another direction. Kyle shoots some pedo commies, they feel elation and pride. Kyle says something dumb, they feel rage and anger.
Let's be real. First, genuine elections with genuine votes isn't a thing. So any talk about how he's going to sway votes away from Trump is horse shit. Votes aren't going to decide this election any more than they decided the last one. Second, there is no one out there who is undecided but leaning towards Trump who suddenly shifted their vote because Kyle Rittenhouse made one Tweet. So let's not pretend that his tweet is this massive betrayal because it could shift the vote away from Trump. The people who are going to vote for Trump already knew they were, the people who are voting for Cumala already knew they are, and all the normies in between who probably won't vote at all are going to be persuaded by $25 value meals from McDonald's and $80 to fill their gas tanks, not one tweet from some D-list celebrity from 3 years ago.
What he said essentially doesn't matter. It's not going to change anyone's mind, he doesn't really know what he's talking about anyways and never did. And all the dumbshits who are raging over his first Tweet about Trump are just as guilty of doing stupid shit when they were in their teens and twenties, or supporting retarded political causes 20 years ago too. They just get the benefit of being nobodies that no one knows about. Kyle is no different from any other 20 something going through a Ron Paul phase. He just gets to have his life shoved into the public sphere because people tried to kill him.
Congrats to all the Trumptards* who bullied this kid into submission for taking a silly but principled stance. Really showed the left you're not a cult!
*Trumptards doesn't refer to all Trump supporters (I am one), but those with the opposite of TDS who desperately lick his choad and act like everyone who isn't in love with Trump wanted the shooter to not miss
The problem is that in US politics you only have two choices and it's all or nothing. It's not a choice between Ron Paul, Trump or Harris. It's just Trump or Harris.
A vote for Paul is effectively a vote for Harris and you don't have to be a "Trumptard" to have a problem with that.
Exactly. Is it really a principled stance if sticking to it gives the exact opposite result of what it means to accomplish? Intent doesn't matter. Only results do.
The two-party US system is not normally a problem of choosing between two candidates, because the multiple choice part happens in the primary.
In the general election you're reaffirming your support for your party's candidate as you've already made your choice. It's only the non-committed people mostly in the center who chose to only select from two candidates that have only two choices.
Of course this time the Democrat party failed to use a primary of many candidates to select their nominee.
There's a problem with the lesser evil argument, which is that if you allow one party to morally blackmail you into voting for them simply because they're not quite as terrible as the other party, they'll be able to take your vote for granted. You completely abdicate any leverage you otherwise had, because the party you're closer to no longer has to win your vote.
True, but on the other hand, in a 2 party system each party has to appeal to the lowest common denominator. They cannot satisfy every group. They don't have to appeal to everyone but they also can't.
That's the advantage of a multi party parliamentary system. There you can actually have parties that appeal to most everyone. That's the theory at least. Europe shows us that they still manage to pervert that system in a multitude of ways.
I don't agree, even though some of those points are correct. Some are completely false. We're all disappointed about Hillary, but Trump got the Durham process started. Maybe the other prosecutors were right - no jury will convict her.
Didn't build the wall.
He started the wall despite no funding from Congress and another impeachment threat.
Didn't drain the swamp.
He uncovered it and everyone realized the swamp is bigger than any one administration can deal with.
Pushed Operation Warp Speed. Pardoned rappers and Israeli spies.
The only reason some of us voted for Trump in 2016 was Hillary was worse. Same with Romney before him and lord was McCain only just barely better (probably wasn't in reality).
Our "winner takes all system" is really fucking awful in that regard, and it becomes more awful by the year as the division of Left/Right stops being gentlemanly disagreement about details and instead an entire separate reality.
At the end of the day though, we have to make the best decision for the best possible outcome in reality. Not in some ideal utopian world we don't live in where a "principled stance" helps get children raped and mutilated.
The contract for Operation Warp Speed was absolutely fine. I have good friends that work in biotech, and I was happy to see the opportunity for them to see what they could do without onerous amounts of government red tape.
What actually happened in the name of "Operation Warp Speed" had no resemblance to what was on the contract, and it's hardly Trump's fault that every single institution and regulatory agency involved basically lied to everybody; most of which happened after he was out of office already.
Yea it was huge faggot energy from these grifters. Rittenhouse being principled in a way that forced the Trump team to be more committed to 2A support is far smarter then every Trump nut hugger getting mad at him for it.
It literally is. The only reason this site is allowed to continue to exist is because the people who made thedonald.win graciously allow it. It is literally a Trump site.
When someone lets you and your little clubhouse move into one of the closets in their house, just because they leave you alone most of the time, don't ever make mistake of thinking that they don't still own it. Kotakuinaction2.win is a guest.
If this platform was for TD exclusively, it wouldn't have nearly as much of an appeal. They "allow" other subs to exist because it bolsters the MAGA brand as being for free speech and it draws in people who wouldn't have otherwise bothered.
Wait why was this news? He's a very young man that was forced into the public thanks to activist leftists, only alive today thanks to the 2nd ammendment so that of course is his primary focus.
The fact he'd write in Ron Paul than risk ANY compromised to the 2nd and no mention of EVER supporting Dems says how much of a none issue this is, just needless drama which at most should have the Trump team clarifying their commitment to the 2nd ammendment.
I respect that he made the world a slightly safer place, but all I read from this is he’s genuinely fucking retarded when it comes to politics.
A vote for anyone but Trump might as well be a vote for the Democrats. But Ron Paul of all people? Dude has one foot in the crypt and they just finally got rid of another zombie presidential candidate
To be fair, most of us were fucking retarded when it comes to politics at that age. Even if we were "right" on something things, it was usually for retarded reasons.
i look back even ten years ago and some of my political takes make me cringe; still and all we learn, we grow and that makes us human
I'd like to point out being British that people used this argument in order to get us to vote Conservative and the Conservatives stabbed us in the back, you've been warned. Even if Trump gets in and he's honest there's no guarantee the GOP won't turn on him like last time, don't be a fool.
Of course the GOP will turn on him like they did last time. That's why we vote for MAGA candidates like Gaetz and pillory establishment scum like Lindsey Graham and Mitch McConnel.
We hate the GOP, so we are doing a hostile takeover.
The problem is Trump himself seems to be allergic to throwing support behind MAGA, which is annoying, the criticisms of Trump especially who he surrounds himself with is valid.
The number one best thing for this nation would be to toss the name “Republican” and for Trump to go full Bull Moose and make MAGA an official third party. Practically impossible since leftists don’t want another TDR who actually foils their plans and actually makes the country great again. Modern republicans are nothing more than safety checks for the leftist agenda. Stop the “reach across the aisle” bullshit, they all want me dead because of my sex and race.
Gaetz is still anti-White, "WE NEED MORE JULIO AND JAMAL AND LESS KAREN!" https://files.catbox.moe/aqnvke.mp4
The fact the Dems ain't even an option to him shows he may have been slightly retarded in chosing Ron Paul initially which is understandable given his age, he ain't Suicidal to pick a Dem.
Clown show. This was written by a committee and makes him sound like he's under duress.
It would have been easy to say, "My comment was tongue in cheek. I would have loved to have seen a President Ron Paul, but voting Trump in 2024 is the best way to protect our constitutional rights." I'm constantly awed by how badly everyone fucks up this media stuff.
MrBeast showed me that a lot of people out there in the public sphere have extremely shitty and unprofessional support teams behind the scenes. You'd be better off just writing the responses yourself in a lot of cases, then at least you can stand by what you truly mean.
It WAS. He was bullied by Trump nuts and since he can't work a real job ever he's dependent on the right to be able to afford food.
Or he could have said "I stand by my comments that Trump isn't strong enough on 2A but obviously Harris is worse and my write-in vote for Paul won't help 2A rights in this country." because he obviously wasn't being tongue in cheek and it's silly to lie like that.
Well yeah. The first statement was unwise, but he's like twenty, is he not? And after being catapulted into public notoriety for having to defend himself against terrorists, he's likely got quite a few of the wrong kind of people whispering in his ear.
There's reporting that he's cut ties with his mother and two sisters, leaving them in abject poverty.
They had to flee Illinois and change their names as a result of harassment and discrimination from the trial.
Last I heard they were being evicted from their new home.
Did his mother and sisters support him during the trial? If not and they sided with BLM, cutting them off completely is more than appropriate, and even remarkably light. I don't know anything about his home life, I don't follow gossip or social media or any of that stuff. But from you saying "mother and sisters" it leads me to believe that maybe his parents are divorced? A single mom and two daughters becoming rabid leftists and being pro-BLM/Antifa during Chimpout Summer is entirely believable. If my mom and sisters sided with the terrorists who tried to murder me for virtue signaling points, and I made it out the other side alive and free, you can be sure as shit I would be cutting them out of my life forever.
I've never heard any mention of Kyle's father being in the picture.
His mother and two now college-aged sisters seem like white, low income normies struggling to get by through working a series of low pay entry-level jobs.
AFAIK they supported him all the way through the trial and suffered emotionally along with him. I've listened to some interviews with them and haven't ever heard any leftist TDS or BLM stuff.
Rittenhouse wrote a book within the last year disclosing some unflattering info about his family such as his mother having a series of deadbeat bfs and his sister failing out of school.
I believe upon reading the manuscript that they asked that he leave some of their personal details out of his book. But Rittenhouse essentially ghosted them and published anyway.
Then I saw a news piece a few months back stating they were getting evicted.
His mother & sisters are adults so Kyle isn't obligated to help them financially.
But the narrative from them I've seen in interviews is that his trial destroyed their lives in Wisconsin/Illinois forcing them to flee. But Kyle has essentially chosen his new circle of handlers and his 15 minutes of fame over his own flesh & blood who are struggling like many Americans and seem like good people.
More than 80% of divorces are initiated by women. So there's a greater than 4 out of 5 chance that it was his mom who left his dad, tearing their family apart. If that is the case, I can definitely see how that would breed some animosity in the only remaining male in a household of all women. I agree his handlers have been leading him astray ever since the trial, but I'm not so quick to assume malice on his part for not sticking with his mom and sisters. That smacks too much of the old "the plight of the poor helpless woman" song and dance, and that tune has run out its welcome long ago. Most women facing a horrible plight have no one but themselves to blame for setting it into motion, and the sob stories are nothing more than yet another attempt at dodging accountability. If we're going to get into choosing something over flesh and blood, I would start with asking whose idea it was to remove his father from his life at a young age.
The bottom line is that one of the most important things a boy can have in his life to keep him from turning into a dipshit is having a good father around. If the father was kicked out of his life entirely, he ended up becoming a dipshit, and that in turn ended up biting his mom in the ass, I'd say it sucks to suck. Shouldn't have kicked the dad out.
This is just an attempt to delegitimise Trump fans by showing unease by one of the better chess pieces.
Focus on the game ahead and not the attempt to flank.
Sounds like he was bullied. I’m a huge Ron Paul fan but voting for Trump since he is on the ballot, but if that is what he wants to do he is free to do so. I imagine he was bullied behind the scenes.
Just checked out his wiki page due to another post, and it does appear that his parents divorced while he was young. So we've got a kid raised by a single mom with two sisters. That's already a recipe for getting all the wrong advice in life. I'm honestly shocked he had the values and courage he did on the night of his shooting. Maybe he learned that from his dad during visitations?
But regardless, we've got a boy raised in an all girl household by a single mom, suddenly gets fame thrust upon him while he's barely legally an adult, gets surrounded by grifters and leeches trying to use him to push their brands or raise their own status, is too young, inexperienced, and naive (again, thanks single mom) about life to recognize the hot chick who is suddenly interested in him is nothing but a gold digger.
Sounds to me like he's been tugged around by manipulative people his entire life. First his single mom, then all the people who glommed on during the trial, and then all the clout chasers after he won. And of course winning is going to make it feel like the people who talked like they were on his side are the only people he can rely on, so he ends up taking their advice even more. I would bet he was talked into coming out against Trump, and was talked into walking it back when it started hitting someone's bottom line.
What he should have done was used the direct aftermath to make a decent chunk of money, then drop out of public life entirely while investing that money in his future. Of course, that's the wisdom of age and retrospect, and I can't blame him for making the choice while having neither. He got suckered in by the fame and money while being encouraged to do all the wrong things by all the wrong people just trying to cut a slice off for themselves, and he ends up being a mouthpiece for political entities he doesn't understand. He needs to stop trying to be a public figure honestly. He had his moment, I'm glad he made it out alive and free, and it's time to go do something else. Get off Twitter and stop doing the talkshows and interviews. Take that money and get a few welding and CNC certificates. Maybe in a few years he can work for one of those boutique AR-15 companies. He's not cut out for politics and public life, and never would have had to even think about it if it hadn't been forced upon him. He's still basically a dumb kid like 10 million others, we just happen to know about him because of shit other people tried to do to him.
I'm willing to give him a pass for being a dumb kid led astray by malicious adults and women, so long as he lets it drop here. I'm shocked there are so many on TDW that are frothy mouth with rage over a fucking Tweet about not supporting Trump. It really does drive home the point that there are useful idiots on both sides, and that it's actually what most people are regardless of their politics. People who don't do a whole lot of thinking, don't self-reflect, don't try to step back and calm their emotions and analyze what they believe and why, and act almost entirely off of emotional reactions. The ones on our side just happened to be pushed by their emotions into supporting the correct things, but they didn't think themselves into these positions, they feel them and don't go much further than that. So another stimulus can set off their emotions in another direction. Kyle shoots some pedo commies, they feel elation and pride. Kyle says something dumb, they feel rage and anger.
Let's be real. First, genuine elections with genuine votes isn't a thing. So any talk about how he's going to sway votes away from Trump is horse shit. Votes aren't going to decide this election any more than they decided the last one. Second, there is no one out there who is undecided but leaning towards Trump who suddenly shifted their vote because Kyle Rittenhouse made one Tweet. So let's not pretend that his tweet is this massive betrayal because it could shift the vote away from Trump. The people who are going to vote for Trump already knew they were, the people who are voting for Cumala already knew they are, and all the normies in between who probably won't vote at all are going to be persuaded by $25 value meals from McDonald's and $80 to fill their gas tanks, not one tweet from some D-list celebrity from 3 years ago.
What he said essentially doesn't matter. It's not going to change anyone's mind, he doesn't really know what he's talking about anyways and never did. And all the dumbshits who are raging over his first Tweet about Trump are just as guilty of doing stupid shit when they were in their teens and twenties, or supporting retarded political causes 20 years ago too. They just get the benefit of being nobodies that no one knows about. Kyle is no different from any other 20 something going through a Ron Paul phase. He just gets to have his life shoved into the public sphere because people tried to kill him.
The kid's an idiot and always was one.
The Forrest Gump of 2A?
Congrats to all the Trumptards* who bullied this kid into submission for taking a silly but principled stance. Really showed the left you're not a cult!
*Trumptards doesn't refer to all Trump supporters (I am one), but those with the opposite of TDS who desperately lick his choad and act like everyone who isn't in love with Trump wanted the shooter to not miss
The problem is that in US politics you only have two choices and it's all or nothing. It's not a choice between Ron Paul, Trump or Harris. It's just Trump or Harris.
A vote for Paul is effectively a vote for Harris and you don't have to be a "Trumptard" to have a problem with that.
Exactly. Is it really a principled stance if sticking to it gives the exact opposite result of what it means to accomplish? Intent doesn't matter. Only results do.
This line works for lefties too:
"A vote for RFK Jr. is effectively a vote for Trump and you don't have to be a 'Kamalatard' to have a problem with that"
Well, it's true. Just don't tell them ;)
It not only works for lefties, but is actually true. This isn't Europe. We vote for the candidate here, not the party.
The two-party US system is not normally a problem of choosing between two candidates, because the multiple choice part happens in the primary.
In the general election you're reaffirming your support for your party's candidate as you've already made your choice. It's only the non-committed people mostly in the center who chose to only select from two candidates that have only two choices.
Of course this time the Democrat party failed to use a primary of many candidates to select their nominee.
There's a problem with the lesser evil argument, which is that if you allow one party to morally blackmail you into voting for them simply because they're not quite as terrible as the other party, they'll be able to take your vote for granted. You completely abdicate any leverage you otherwise had, because the party you're closer to no longer has to win your vote.
True, but on the other hand, in a 2 party system each party has to appeal to the lowest common denominator. They cannot satisfy every group. They don't have to appeal to everyone but they also can't.
That's the advantage of a multi party parliamentary system. There you can actually have parties that appeal to most everyone. That's the theory at least. Europe shows us that they still manage to pervert that system in a multitude of ways.
I don't agree, even though some of those points are correct. Some are completely false. We're all disappointed about Hillary, but Trump got the Durham process started. Maybe the other prosecutors were right - no jury will convict her.
He started the wall despite no funding from Congress and another impeachment threat.
He uncovered it and everyone realized the swamp is bigger than any one administration can deal with.
Neither of these were in the 2016 platform.
The only reason some of us voted for Trump in 2016 was Hillary was worse. Same with Romney before him and lord was McCain only just barely better (probably wasn't in reality).
Our "winner takes all system" is really fucking awful in that regard, and it becomes more awful by the year as the division of Left/Right stops being gentlemanly disagreement about details and instead an entire separate reality.
At the end of the day though, we have to make the best decision for the best possible outcome in reality. Not in some ideal utopian world we don't live in where a "principled stance" helps get children raped and mutilated.
The contract for Operation Warp Speed was absolutely fine. I have good friends that work in biotech, and I was happy to see the opportunity for them to see what they could do without onerous amounts of government red tape.
What actually happened in the name of "Operation Warp Speed" had no resemblance to what was on the contract, and it's hardly Trump's fault that every single institution and regulatory agency involved basically lied to everybody; most of which happened after he was out of office already.
Yea it was huge faggot energy from these grifters. Rittenhouse being principled in a way that forced the Trump team to be more committed to 2A support is far smarter then every Trump nut hugger getting mad at him for it.
www.reddit.com
There's a forum for you that way, don't let the door hit you on the ass on the way out.
This is not a Trump forum, bitch.
.win
It literally is. The only reason this site is allowed to continue to exist is because the people who made thedonald.win graciously allow it. It is literally a Trump site.
When someone lets you and your little clubhouse move into one of the closets in their house, just because they leave you alone most of the time, don't ever make mistake of thinking that they don't still own it. Kotakuinaction2.win is a guest.
Wtf kind of retarded argument is this?
If this platform was for TD exclusively, it wouldn't have nearly as much of an appeal. They "allow" other subs to exist because it bolsters the MAGA brand as being for free speech and it draws in people who wouldn't have otherwise bothered.
News flash, Boards like Conpro exist here, and so does this board, just cus we dislike Zion-Don or whatever doesn't mean this isn't our site too lol.