It's a tragedy to have to stoop to the left's level, but for every sanctimonious Con Inc fuckwit virtue-signaling about "principles" at this point, how many of these same loathsome cuckolds stood up for James Fields when he was framed by a kangaroo court for fleeing a psychotic mob?
Oh right, these brave defenders of principles were nowhere to be found because they were afraid of being called not-sees. When the fire was raging and the left was setting the precedent of guilt-by-political-opinion, anyone with REAL principles was committing optics suicide by speaking out against the framing of an extremely unpopular target of state persecution. And they had to suffer that fate because of all the Con Inc cowards who wouldn't put their foot down and say it doesn't fucking matter what someone believes, they could be a nazi or a commie or a Scientologist and it has fuckall to do with whether a given individual is actually guilty of the crime they're alleged to have committed.
These insufferable faggots didn't even stand up for Kyle Rittenhouse until it was safe. Meanwhile for a year Kyle got fucking hosed by a Lionel Hutz greaseball of a lawyer who grifted a bunch of donations because Con Inc was nowhere to be found. Point being, if Con Inc had had real principles when it was actually hard to do so, we would have never had to stoop to this level in the first place.
Also I fear what would’ve happened to Rittenhouse if he didn’t have the judge that he did
Yes, Rittenhouse was extremely lucky to have both a judge and a jury that was willing to do what's right despite the potential danger that put them in. As well as the moral blackmail of indirectly causing yet another riot if the rabid NPCs didn't get what they want.
I remember when that first happened thinking clearly this guy was defending himself. After the verdict some jerks in the media were saying people will be intimidated now and won’t protest. I was like good. Their idea of “protest” is acting like wild animals and destroying everything
Not to mention how lucky he was that each shooting was recorded at multiple angles, and the one that survived torpedoed his testimony by admitting Klye only shot him after he pointed his gun at Klye. They so desperately wanted to railroad him like James Fields.
Things are going to be so much worse as millennials and especially zoomers become judges.
"Nice" is not a principle. Justice is a principle. Lefties and normal people are not the same. It is right and just to oppose those who would see your family and community destroyed. "Nice" is what Americans have had shoved down their throats for a century to make them docile. We should not be nice to anyone who would see our country destroyed, or prevent us from rectifying the damage don since the 60s. Violence does have a place in civilized society*. We were not nice to King George's Army: we shot them.
*I'll grant here that the average twat doesn't have the brains to determine when to cross this line, so it should usually be discourage. It should never be take off the table entirely.
Don't forget what conservatives will do for Israel. When the protests broke out after 10/7, they started doxxing, blacklisting, and even getting university presidents forced out.
It's not that they don't have fight. It's that they're fighting for someone else, not you.
You've been given a blank cheque to purge every communist and Islamist from every position of power, and you're turning up your nose because you refuse to use Israel as an excuse.
No, we haven't. Israel wants to send Muslim refugees here. As long as their lobbyists remain embedded we will never fix immigration.
I’ll keep repeating this until blue in the face. Holding someone to their standards does not make them your standards.
Thanks, I am going to steal this. It is concise and effective.
Excellent point
Just so long as you don't normalize the tactic in the process. It's pretty hard to go back to a world where your employment is dependend on just your job performance if both sides are looking to cancel you for stepping out of line with their playbook.
Principles are for when you are dealing with other people who are principled. A polar bear doesn't give a shit about your principles when it devours you and a communist doesn't give a shit about your principles when they're imprisoning you.
"If you expect the world to be fair with you because you are fair, you’re fooling yourself. That’s like expecting the lion not to eat you because you didn’t eat him."
Every libertarian retard saying "um wow hypocrisy much?" or other related dialogue loops about cancel culture is just as much of an enemy as leftists are.
Underrated post
There are three breeds of "right-wingers", probably more but it's mainly neocons, MAGA, and wignats. The "Con Inc" you speak of are neocons who have been called out and spat on for over a decade now by the Tea Party/MAGA. Yes, they have always been a problem, but why are some retards lambasting others who warn against potentially taking things too far as having been neocucks all along? There are those here who are pro-Trump/pro-MAGA that are saying "hold up" and getting shit on for that.
The hell are we putting beliefs into people's heads that weren't there before? Why are a community of users that mostly agree on a lot of things tearing at each other over this shit that could have been a lot worse, when the sheep are finally having a wake up call and the left is on the run?
Another user has already laid the groundwork here.
Currently I'm giving some users here the courtesy of treating them as better than the average midwit and telling people who espouse "violence is never the answer" why that is delusional and will lead to the downfall of a fair and just society. The most principled in society must actually be willing to be the most violent else you'll allow ever more unprincipled violence, because only those with firm principles will restrict that violence to where it is necessary rather than self serving or convenient.
violence will always be the supreme authority from which all other authority is derived. the question has never been whether to apply it or not but rather where and why. we have a lot of wheres and boy do we have a lot of whys.
Or what happened to Chauvin when George Groid OD'd in his care.
engaging in cancel culture against people who openly encourage hurting you and your leaders is not unprincipled. quite frankly, it is a very peaceful self-defense.
Yeah, too peaceful. Uttering threats is a crime and people should by prosecuted, not cancelled. That's my issue with the Right "cancelling"; they're not going after people who, say, publicly support communism, they're going after actual criminals with a lesser punishment than is warranted.
The new "system" that White people are forced to live under has very simple rules.
Racism and Nazism are the worst sins imaginable (but only if White people do it).
If White people protect themselves, become aware of the bias and crimes against them, or collectivize for mutual protection, in any way, this is equated to racism and Nazism.
White people are denied the following naturals rights: to have their own homes, to protect their homes, to protect the people within those homes, to control who enters their home ("home" in this context is applicable at all levels, including the national level), to form groups with people of their choosing, to collectivize for mutual goals, to assert their political will in whatever community or society they inhabit, to espouse for their own interests, to be led by their own people, to have their own property, to have children, to raise their own children in a healthy environment, to be able to protect themselves, to be able to protect their fellow Whites, to be able to live. Trying to assert any of these natural rights now denied, will result in said White person being labeled as racist and Nazi.
Both false choice political parties adhere to this dogma.
Yeah. We never stick our necks out for each other. Its why they keep bullying us. Its why they know they can railroad us in kangaroo court. One of their thugs get killed and multiple neighborhoods burn down. Not that i suggest we do any of that. Its just.. its not helpful just making funny memes or "remember seth". Its why most people here hesitate. Too many of us have something to lose and not much backup.
This is a big piece: the Right have things to lose while the Left usually do not.
I would hazard that most Rightoids have families and jobs that pay to maintain their standard of living. Getting cancelled means losing yoyr family home or at least being evicted with your wife and kids.
Most Leftards, otoh, are living off government stimulus and couldn't get kicked out of their homes if they were running a bike theft ring (which I've seen).
It's not an equal but the Left is playing it much smarter. By using bodies in the streets, instead of political donations, they take advantage of the inherent unemployability of their constituents. The Right actually has more resources, but they're obsessed with "getting theirs", even though half of it goes to taxes, which then finds the Left. The average Rightoid simply isn't willing to sacrifice their crumbs for their own political future (and that of their kids) while the Left quietly bleeds them dry.
And the RNC is currently crashing grindr due to how much they value "equity" for gays, and how much they hate "the real homophobes".
That's where playing by your opponents' rules gets you.
The Right needs to set it's own rules, and have the integrity to stand by them, or they'll just become the Left and it won't matter who wins.
Uniparty. Much of the federal government is a sham, and politics theater. The entire notion of democracy being pushed as a positive thing has been done to obscure fraud and claim legitimacy as a government.
Fox news was revealed as controlled by the globalists in 2020. The largest supposed right wing media and the majority of politicians in the supposedly right wing party have no intent to represent the actual base. They serve the globalists.
Rinos and dems are little different. They don't have principles, only propaganda.