It's a tragedy to have to stoop to the left's level, but for every sanctimonious Con Inc fuckwit virtue-signaling about "principles" at this point, how many of these same loathsome cuckolds stood up for James Fields when he was framed by a kangaroo court for fleeing a psychotic mob?
Oh right, these brave defenders of principles were nowhere to be found because they were afraid of being called not-sees. When the fire was raging and the left was setting the precedent of guilt-by-political-opinion, anyone with REAL principles was committing optics suicide by speaking out against the framing of an extremely unpopular target of state persecution. And they had to suffer that fate because of all the Con Inc cowards who wouldn't put their foot down and say it doesn't fucking matter what someone believes, they could be a nazi or a commie or a Scientologist and it has fuckall to do with whether a given individual is actually guilty of the crime they're alleged to have committed.
These insufferable faggots didn't even stand up for Kyle Rittenhouse until it was safe. Meanwhile for a year Kyle got fucking hosed by a Lionel Hutz greaseball of a lawyer who grifted a bunch of donations because Con Inc was nowhere to be found. Point being, if Con Inc had had real principles when it was actually hard to do so, we would have never had to stoop to this level in the first place.
There are three breeds of "right-wingers", probably more but it's mainly neocons, MAGA, and wignats. The "Con Inc" you speak of are neocons who have been called out and spat on for over a decade now by the Tea Party/MAGA. Yes, they have always been a problem, but why are some retards lambasting others who warn against potentially taking things too far as having been neocucks all along? There are those here who are pro-Trump/pro-MAGA that are saying "hold up" and getting shit on for that.
The hell are we putting beliefs into people's heads that weren't there before? Why are a community of users that mostly agree on a lot of things tearing at each other over this shit that could have been a lot worse, when the sheep are finally having a wake up call and the left is on the run?
Another user has already laid the groundwork here.
Currently I'm giving some users here the courtesy of treating them as better than the average midwit and telling people who espouse "violence is never the answer" why that is delusional and will lead to the downfall of a fair and just society. The most principled in society must actually be willing to be the most violent else you'll allow ever more unprincipled violence, because only those with firm principles will restrict that violence to where it is necessary rather than self serving or convenient.
violence will always be the supreme authority from which all other authority is derived. the question has never been whether to apply it or not but rather where and why. we have a lot of wheres and boy do we have a lot of whys.