I'm going to state the obvious, and it ought to be pretty obvious at this point even without an explicit admission; these companies are getting government money. In fact I'd say that's their 'seed' capital.
Government especially, but private too. It's free money in a ponzi scheme since every single pension fund is operating under the "growth based economy" expectation of more money coming in than going out.
So they invest in a few things that can show some return on a report here and there, and the rest into these kind of asset management companies or buying land to sell at a loss to Bill Gates.
In crypto part of what an investor looks at is how its minted. This is why mining was popular. Anyone who could mine got in on a share of the new mint entering the economy. I bring it up because with US dollars, we pay jews to print the dollars, then we borrow and reborrow the same money with interest twice over if we want that money to make a pit stop before it circles back to jews. This creates a net negative economy of debt (read: goyim slavery) as the interest is not minted: more debt exists than currency and there is zero chance for everyone to be out of debt ever.
In slight defense of Vanguard, they actually backed off on that shit.
“We cannot state that ESG investing is better performance-wise than broad index-based investing,” Buckley said. “Our research indicates that ESG investing does not have any advantage over broad-based investing.”
Buckley’s statements followed Vanguard’s withdrawal from the Net Zero Asset Managers (NZAM) initiative—a group of 301 asset managers that says it is “committed to supporting the goal of net zero greenhouse gas emissions by 2050 or sooner, focused on lowering carbon emissions in their portfolios.”
From another article:
Daniel Wiener, chairman of Adviser Investments in Newton, Massachusetts and a longtime Vanguard observer, said the firm's withdrawal showed it lacked a strong leader on ESG issues that BlackRock has in its CEO Laurence Fink.
"Backing out of this thing is simply Vanguard blowing with the winds of constant change. They don’t have a strong personality like Fink to champion a cause," Wiener said
Vanguard is actually owned by it's member's funds, which makes it somewhat more answerable to normal people as opposed to using your retirement funds to lose money on Fink's pet projects.
A conspiracy nut might say this validates claims that there's been a semitic agenda to destroy homogeneous cultures for decades. Not only are they blatantly doing it but they've amassed an bottomless war chest in anticipation preparation for it.
They've got chutzpah.
Darkmineral next or will it be just Blackrock but in Spanish?
That would be no bueno because black in Spanish is... El NeGrO. Though, El Roca Negro would be a hilarious name for a Spanish restaurant in Mecca.
I'm going to state the obvious, and it ought to be pretty obvious at this point even without an explicit admission; these companies are getting government money. In fact I'd say that's their 'seed' capital.
You are correct, but probably not the way you think. These companies own the US debt, and the interest payments are going to them.
Pension funds.
Government especially, but private too. It's free money in a ponzi scheme since every single pension fund is operating under the "growth based economy" expectation of more money coming in than going out.
So they invest in a few things that can show some return on a report here and there, and the rest into these kind of asset management companies or buying land to sell at a loss to Bill Gates.
https://www.dtnpf.com/agriculture/web/ag/news/business-inputs/article/2024/01/30/tech-billionaire-bill-gates-spent
In crypto part of what an investor looks at is how its minted. This is why mining was popular. Anyone who could mine got in on a share of the new mint entering the economy. I bring it up because with US dollars, we pay jews to print the dollars, then we borrow and reborrow the same money with interest twice over if we want that money to make a pit stop before it circles back to jews. This creates a net negative economy of debt (read: goyim slavery) as the interest is not minted: more debt exists than currency and there is zero chance for everyone to be out of debt ever.
In slight defense of Vanguard, they actually backed off on that shit.
From another article:
Vanguard is actually owned by it's member's funds, which makes it somewhat more answerable to normal people as opposed to using your retirement funds to lose money on Fink's pet projects.
A conspiracy nut might say this validates claims that there's been a semitic agenda to destroy homogeneous cultures for decades. Not only are they blatantly doing it but they've amassed an bottomless war chest in
anticipationpreparation for it.Idk I like their grills.
Blackrock(bergsteinowitz)