https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Al_Goldstein#Views_on_religion
The only claim I'm making in this post is that this wikipedia article exists and that it contains text, Dom.
In his 2004 book XXX-Communicated: A Rebel Without a Shul, Luke Ford wrote about a conversation with Goldstein, in which Ford asked Goldstein why Jews were dramatically overrepresented in the porn industry. He answered, "The only reason that Jews are in pornography is that we think that Christ sucks. Catholicism sucks. We don't believe in authoritarianism. Pornography thus becomes a way of defiling Christian culture and, as it penetrates to the very heart of the American mainstream (and is no doubt consumed by those very same WASPs), its subversive character becomes more charged." Ford then asked, "What does it mean to you to be a Jew?" To which Goldstein responded, "It doesn't mean anything. It means that I'm called a kike."
kike, a horrible terrible word that means,
checks notes
....uh, circle. it means circle. God awful thing to be called circle.
And they're called circles because illiterate jewish immigrants would sign their names with circles instead of X's because the letter X resembles a cross too much, demonstrating their contempt for Christianity.
imagine it
"identify yourself."
draws a circle on the line
"what's this?"
"Kikel."
"huh I guess these people are kikes or something.. NEXT"
what oppression. what prosecution. the horror.
There was some interview with Ben Shapiro about his faith, and the interviewer brought up Jesus, asking if jews still thought he was a good guy if not the son of god, etc. and Ben got super quiet, and had to choke out some cagey comments. It really is hard for them to hide their utter hatred of christians, it's why saying Christ is King sends them into a rage so easily.
Now you know where the stereotype of demons, vampires, and the like fearing/hating the crucifix came from.
Of course it's hard to hide. Denying the Savior is the fundamental pillar of their entire identity. There is no more important aspect of it, because to cease that denial is admission of inherent falsity.
Do you have a link to that video? I want to send it to my family who are obsessed with that guy.
To be fair, just as how “kike” means “circle,” “nigger” really just means “black,” “gook,” “chink,” and “ching chong” are essentially the racial slur equivalent of doing a bad imitation of someone’s accent, and “jap” is literally just a shortening of “Japanese,” but if I say any of those, you can assume I’m expressing a bit more contempt than the literal translation implies. Ironically, the (false, I think?) etymology of “cracker” as “person cracking a whip” would actually make it the worst racial slur under this standard, because it’s the only one I know that is based on misplaced blame.
Reacting to insults towards one’s identity and in-group with anger is probably a healthy self-defense thing, frankly. If whites did that sort of thing more, they’d probably be better off.
Edit: important to note, though, that the institutional power of that anger should probably be limited to personal choice—“he called me a nigger, so I’m not going to be friends with him.” If your righteous anger about being called a mean name results in a person being debanked and fired, or in you beating him to death and getting a relatively light sentence because you were “provoked,” maybe the guy using the racial slur had a point.
Even more amusing about the term "cracker" is that it's actually a much older term that modern blacks have misused and appropriated.
that's it. so often people misunderstand that term. the same is true of redneck. I am both and proud of it.
youre making a lot of assumption in regard to etymology but my main point was I think someone like say for example a jewish person should take much higher offense to being called a hook nosed baby dick suckin shylock christ killer which are words with actual offensive meaning rather than a term they literally came up with themselves by using it on identifying documents but in general the reason whites don't get offended by words is because they aren't low iq animals like all the shitskins you've mentioned
also that is absolutely the false etymology of cracker it is from the gaelic craic you can read more here
https://www.history-now.org/writings/from-craic-to-cracker/
Kike became a slur because the label accrued decades upon decades of negative baggage due to Jewish behavior (plus pattern recognition). Slurs are essentially hyper focused stereotypes, and stereotypes don’t fall out of the sky. In fact, they are amongst the most reproducible phenomena in all of social science. The euphemism treadmill exists primarily as an attempt to periodically shed accrued stereotypes via rejection of organically evolved labels. Because when you deny someone the ability to name something, you make it impossible for them to fight that thing.
Can't add anything more to this post
They hate it because they're a bunch of squares.
(Ah, fuck, now I can't get that Polygon Song out of my head.)
hahaha. oh wait you're serious. HAHAHAHA
Gotta translate that from doublespeak.
"We don't believe in moral authority, and we view morality as tyranny."
Why did we stop getting called WASPs? Because they're afraid of our sting.
Notice how incest porn came out of nowhere and got shoved on everyone? There was an old Return of Kings article that also explained how degenerate shit like interracial porn is pushed on the front pages of porn sites despite having very low viewing numbers.
You can't even make the argument that porn is for men, because if you asked any guy honestly what his fantasies are he's going to say a harem. But harem porn isn't even a thing in the west, it doesn't really exist. Even group scenes are more about degrading the women than being a male fantasy.
Also notice how of one mind jews are about hiding their christ hatred. Every christian I know thinks jews are great, they have no idea how jews think of them. Even regular jews will clam up if you ask them about jesus.
You know around the mid 2000's when I first got unrestricted access to the internet on my own computer I remember seeing how much free pornography was available back then. I used to do some of my own web hosting and admin as a hobby and I knew how much web hosting cost and had some idea of what you could make from ads and it made me think the sums for the porn industry really didn't add up. That someone was ultimately bank rolling the internet being awash with professionally produce pornography.
I do think some of it is an inherent part of feeding people hardcore pornography for decades now, that a lot of people need more extreme stuff to get their rocks off because they need more and more stimulation. But yeah - the whole incest thing is definitely a top down agenda same with all the blacked stuff. Its a weapon. I know a lot of younger guys who are just fucked in the head because of it. A young guy I work with complains he is addicted to it and whacks off 7 times a day to porn. It broke up his relationship with his baby mama. What a disaster. I'm glad I never got hooked on that shit.
Porn in general doesn't make sense to me. Why would you want to get off to another dude having sex with the woman you desire? Why not watch a striptease or some other solo video instead? Or better yet, just don't use porn at all.
Now you know why it's called cuck hypnosis.
The only decent way to watch porn is to watch VR, POV and lesbian. Everything else is poison.
This shows why watching pornography is gay.
Posted in reference to this thread: https://kotakuinaction2.win/p/17tLKP8yFI/x/c/4ZCaZkRelGh
at the same time :p they penalize 3d/2d porn (mastercard, visa, etc payment processors). i guess since there isnt a real woman to be a whore.
It is why it is nothing but race mixing and incest. Unsurprisingly, the only media that they produce that prominently features White people
Yeah, because imagine openly saying this shit about any other religion and being able to walk freely afterwards. We need to bring back the crusades
I highly recommend that everyone read "Libido Dominandi: Sexual Liberation and Political Control" by E. Michael Jones. The author's thesis, which was originally written in the 1990s, is that undermining the moral order though sexual liberation, is being used as a way to control us. Subsequent events since it was first published have supported this thesis. The second edition was recently published and is available at the publisher's website.
The way to liberate oneself from this from of control is to reject sexual liberation and place one's passions under the control of reason. Otherwise we become slaves to sinful passions, which isn't really news as our King taught us:
Sex is a gift from God that is properly ordered towards the production of children in married couples. This doesn't mean everyone has to be married and have children, the long history of the Church has many saints who were virgins, and each has their own calling. But it does mean that each of us should make a concerted effort to fight against all sexual sins, including pornography, masturbation, and fornication.
Thank you for this post and recommendation. Idk if I wanna buy a book on it (or pirate from a decent publisher) but maybe I'll come around to it... since it sounds like something full of information that would improve my kung fu.
There is no such thing as a good jew.
I don't agree with this. There are plenty of jewish who have nothing to do with anything, and they have something in common with us in that their future and prosperity have been put on the table as a bet in a game played by psychopaths.
Ask them what they think about Jesus and see how quickly it devolves.
A mentally ill degenerate is going to let it control their entire image of the world.
Collectivism, not even once.
It's funny how "that crowd" loves Wikipedia when it says what they want.
Are you challenging the veracity of the source? Let me think, maybe the converted jewish author of the book deliberately misquoted the gentle, Christian-loving pornographer Mr. Goldstein, making him seem evil, wrongfully, before getting his permission to print the misquote and attribute it directly to him?
I'm challenging you. If you have an actually reliable source, why did you use Wikipedia?
Did you copy-paste from 'the book', whatever book that is, or did you copy-paste Wikipedia?
You know many Christian-loving pornographers? I believe Lexington Steele if I got his name right is one.
Let's skip a few posts. If you had a PDF of the book in question and of the code for libel in the USA, would that be meaningful to you or affect your natural biases or your opinion on any of the subject matter in any way?
I was not born with the opinions I have. It's easy to be a curious person from my position. Far from being some kind of violation, Rule 16ing my race and accusing us of a worldwide "intertemporal" conspiracy based on ethnicity was a core aspect of my entire education about myself from childhood to degree.
That's the starting point and the motive to learn more and move on from that position is natural, just as someone who happened to be on the other side of the pond would have a perfectly natural motive to deny, discredit, or simply ignore the very same information. I see it as a ying and yang deal and a perfectly mundane example of reality being plain and obvious.
I'm not asking about that. I'm asking why you decided to cite Wikipedia as though it is in any way a reliable source. And why are you defending it?
I'll admit that I have done so as well, but it has always been paired with an expression of shame for my despicable behavior. I'd never dream of doing it and then doubling down.
What is that motive exactly?
Hey didn't we already skip these middle-posts at the beginning of my last post? That was supposed to save us both time, cat.
Tough titty, cat. It's a list of claims and sources. If you're not questioning the claim or source itself you might as well not wax No True Scott about a website they appeared in.
I think your non-reply on whether the PDF would be significant to you answers both of our questions about natural motive, if you think about it. I lack the motive to talk about it much more than I already have.
Lmaoooo and Antonio shut the fuck up because he knew he couldn't do shit.
Fuck I hate that guy. Such a disingenuous shitbag
I understand that you really, really don't want to talk about why you use Wikipedia and present is as a reliable source, but no deal. You must think everyone else is stupid.
So just to be clear, you copy-pasted what you say is a 'claim', that you in no way verified? That is your defense?
Are you alright? This sounds like you just overdosed on weed.
Did you just heckin neglect to include a heckin argument?
Not on trial.
Waste some other goy's time.
It's also okay to trust jews when they say jews bad. But leftists never had actual standards.