wikipedia also includes SPLC on its "list of reliable sources", even though SPLC has paid out millions for defamation (meaning they lied), and have repeatedly argued in court that their statements are opinions rather than assertions of fact. the fact that SPLC admits its statements are opinions and not facts means they're not eligible for inclusion on wikipedia.
I guess it is hilarious when the information controllers are turning against the ADL. I think it would look even more ridiculous if the ADL started to claim that Wikipedia has been compromised by Antisemites (I don't think that they are going to do that right away, as it would be another blow to them, but I think they might do so if the current israel situation drags on long enough).
I'm sure the ADL will start some campaign behind the scenes to get rid of editors who voted against them and get reinstated. Like, go straight to the Wikipedia higher-ups, cry antisemitism and tell them it would be a shame if something happened to their donations.
No guarantee that that would work, either, since pro-palestinian people might start noticing(tm), or the fact that there is probably a good number of lefty editors that might not take kindly to being called antisemites despite what they believe.
IMHO editors are easily replaceable. Leftist ideologues who do it for free are a dime a dozen. The only power they have is the power they are allowed to have by the people behind groups like the ADL.
The people behind the ADL on the other hand can "convince" payment processors to no longer handle donations for Wikipedia.
“ADL no longer appears to adhere to a serious, mainstream and intellectually cogent definition of antisemitism, but has instead given into the shameless politicization of the very subject that it was originally esteemed for being reliable on,”
They were always shitty, I don't know why this is a surprise to anyone
True, but what this shows is the cracks in the movement among leftists are real I think regardless of personal views on the issue itself Israel-Palestine is going to be something major even for the American elections it seems.
The Muslims were always going to side with the Muslim country so I don't understand why the elites are surprised by this but I think they've really underestimated how many idiot leftist women out there are just defaulting to pro-palestine statements as well to virtue signal likely to their Muslim colleagues. Too many of them to silence so now they've got a major problem and it looks like the ADL have gotten infected with it which is hilarious.
Hell, I think even trying to silence that is probably going to backfire in their faces, since it would look like they are promoting what they claim to be against.
While I hold no hope that it will effect actual change, it at least brings some levity to watch this conflict rip these groups apart over different loyalties.
This is a good turning point, anything to discredit the ADL is a good thing. Many normies are not aware of the dangers of ADL and AIPAC, I have red pilled many just on these two items alone. That is the way to get their attention instead of just saying it’s the joos all the time.
The ADL polices the newspapers Wiki has declared the good sources. Wikipedia isn't going to be any less jewish on account of banning the ADL
wikipedia also includes SPLC on its "list of reliable sources", even though SPLC has paid out millions for defamation (meaning they lied), and have repeatedly argued in court that their statements are opinions rather than assertions of fact. the fact that SPLC admits its statements are opinions and not facts means they're not eligible for inclusion on wikipedia.
but here we are anyways.
The SPLC staff know they're a-holes. It's all about power.
We all need a good laugh in these trying times and clown world always provides.
I guess it is hilarious when the information controllers are turning against the ADL. I think it would look even more ridiculous if the ADL started to claim that Wikipedia has been compromised by Antisemites (I don't think that they are going to do that right away, as it would be another blow to them, but I think they might do so if the current israel situation drags on long enough).
I'm sure the ADL will start some campaign behind the scenes to get rid of editors who voted against them and get reinstated. Like, go straight to the Wikipedia higher-ups, cry antisemitism and tell them it would be a shame if something happened to their donations.
No guarantee that that would work, either, since pro-palestinian people might start noticing(tm), or the fact that there is probably a good number of lefty editors that might not take kindly to being called antisemites despite what they believe.
IMHO editors are easily replaceable. Leftist ideologues who do it for free are a dime a dozen. The only power they have is the power they are allowed to have by the people behind groups like the ADL.
The people behind the ADL on the other hand can "convince" payment processors to no longer handle donations for Wikipedia.
They were always shitty, I don't know why this is a surprise to anyone
True, but what this shows is the cracks in the movement among leftists are real I think regardless of personal views on the issue itself Israel-Palestine is going to be something major even for the American elections it seems.
The Muslims were always going to side with the Muslim country so I don't understand why the elites are surprised by this but I think they've really underestimated how many idiot leftist women out there are just defaulting to pro-palestine statements as well to virtue signal likely to their Muslim colleagues. Too many of them to silence so now they've got a major problem and it looks like the ADL have gotten infected with it which is hilarious.
Hell, I think even trying to silence that is probably going to backfire in their faces, since it would look like they are promoting what they claim to be against.
It must suck to not be able to stiffle truth after 80 years of controlling it
While I hold no hope that it will effect actual change, it at least brings some levity to watch this conflict rip these groups apart over different loyalties.
Republicans: "wtf I love the ADL now"
"Now"? 🤣
Listen, the ADL is a good thing IN THEORY but it has strayed from it's "original intention".
It's original intention was to defend pedophilic jews.
Sorry, that was the best boomer impression I could do
I was shocked that a wild boomer appeared when i read your comment. You got me.
Spike protein brained boomer Scott Adams says that exact line and it makes me seethe
Man you got us there lmao
No it’s not, shit like ‘100%’ is considered antisemitism. Check their site. They are a danger to the First Amendment
Maybe I should have used parentheses instead of quotes. Subtlety doesn't translate well over text.
Thankfully I've never heard any boomer say that, I'd probably blow my top lol.
they were never reliable on anything
Glorious.
This is a good turning point, anything to discredit the ADL is a good thing. Many normies are not aware of the dangers of ADL and AIPAC, I have red pilled many just on these two items alone. That is the way to get their attention instead of just saying it’s the joos all the time.
The ADL and Wikipedia are both woke trash organisations. I hope they destroy each other
- "You bigot!"
- "No! You!"
ADL is a hate group.
Hah. They let too many communists in and get too many ideas about revolution and decolonization.
let them fight
That's awesome. Wikipedia still flagged though.
Bear in mind just below the RfC for the ADL, there is also a RfC for The Daily Telegraph.
Rfc?
Request for comment.
hahahahahah