He is only anti-Muslim. He's fine with flooding the UK with pajeets or anyone else. He spends half his time whining about anti-Semitism. He gets paid by Zionists like Robert Shillman to be such a huge cuck.
Such a position is considered a significantly right-wing position in the UK. I don't get it either, but it shouldn't surprise people. He's basically a normie liberal.
He's not. Flooding the country with anyone-but-Muslims is a shit position. We have huge problems from immigrants in the US, and not many of them are Muslims.
I think it's more a protection against them moving too far, too fast. There's always that thought in the back of their minds "is this going to be the thing that finally makes people snap and fight back?"
On the other hand, things like the Oklahoma City bombing, which was a retaliation for Waco, didn't involve guns at all. Presumably if the English wanted to rise up, they would be planting IEDs, stabbing cops in the back while they ate breakfast at a cafe, throwing acid in their faces, etc. and wouldn't be terribly disadvantaged by not having firearms.
The real issue is that they probably won't be in a uprising in either England or the US. The politicians are skilled at ratcheting back when needed, and allowing performative "debate" and controlled opposition.
Eh, I think the public should be armed. That puts the fear in the parasite, to the point they're willing to use nuclear munitions on a population center. You know about that case, right?
Of course. The public must also develop information distribution, countermeasures to electronic warfare and complete self-defense network systems which yes - does involve capturing, interrogating and removing the state-sponsored terrorists they send to silence what they deem "wrongthink".
Guns will protect you, at least in some situations, at least sometimes. That means that whoever wants to subjugate you will avoid these situations and will have a more difficult job.
I often think the 2nd amendment is a mistake because it allows you to live in essentially the same society but because you still have "muh guns" and are allowed to shoot them on your farm and pretend you're better than the UK.
It's a difference without differentiation.
You keep thinking that because you have guns pointed at the door so to speak, the government will come in through your door rather then your window.
Nah. You can't fix that level of shit ever. We struggle to keep the US going with barely under 100 IQ people, imagine having to run countries full of 80 IQ retard street shitters. Isn't going to happen. Wall them off and let them either figure it out, kill each other, or starve.
Nice fantasy, but the left has forever tainted the legacy of the colonial improvement of middle-of-nowhere hell-holes populated by street-shitting cretins who venerate rats and cows.
Leave them to themselves to rot.
I'm having a deja-vu. Has this subject come up before?
Why did you switch accounts before replying here? Deleting these accounts and making yet another won't help you not be obvious. I suppose it's not technically your fault that you're too retarded to not be obvious, but even a 'tard like you ought to be able to find a better hobby.
Trying to artificially convert this place into a Eunice Winstead fan club.
Your goals are as retarded as you are. I obviously overestimated you. You're too retarded to find a better hobby, because you're clearly too much of a tard to coexist with real people.
Tommy Robinson supports immigration.
He is only anti-Muslim. He's fine with flooding the UK with pajeets or anyone else. He spends half his time whining about anti-Semitism. He gets paid by Zionists like Robert Shillman to be such a huge cuck.
Comment Reported for: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks
Comment Approved: This comment didn't do that.
And Mr. Robinson has long opposed illegal immigration as well, but he has repeatedly identified himself as a Zionist if it makes you feel better.
"Oi, you got a loicense for that invasion?" - Tommy Robinson
Such a position is considered a significantly right-wing position in the UK. I don't get it either, but it shouldn't surprise people. He's basically a normie liberal.
There are people besides Tommy Robinson who oppose immigration in the UK, ya know.
Sure, like Beau Dade.
Tommy's a good dude though.
He's not. Flooding the country with anyone-but-Muslims is a shit position. We have huge problems from immigrants in the US, and not many of them are Muslims.
Pajeet street shitter talking to himself is a new one
deport both sides, they're free to have their foreign blood war in their foreign land.
I don't need an hour and a half video to tell me something I already knew from stories that are regularly posted here.
Yeah... nah.
Yep
He's not wrong.
Does Robinson cover Sam Melia in this?
The fact you guys think one of the freest countries is a "totalitarian state" 🤣
"Freeist" compared to where? Afghanistan?
Comment Reported for: Rule 12 - Falsehoods
Damn near. The UK isn't a free state at all. It's an actual police state from the surveillance at best.
He's correct. How long before he's railroaded into Wormwood Scrubs?
We have seen Owen Shroyer and President Trump jailed for speech.
Guns won’t protect us if the media and big tech are weaponized against us.
I think it's more a protection against them moving too far, too fast. There's always that thought in the back of their minds "is this going to be the thing that finally makes people snap and fight back?"
On the other hand, things like the Oklahoma City bombing, which was a retaliation for Waco, didn't involve guns at all. Presumably if the English wanted to rise up, they would be planting IEDs, stabbing cops in the back while they ate breakfast at a cafe, throwing acid in their faces, etc. and wouldn't be terribly disadvantaged by not having firearms.
The real issue is that they probably won't be in a uprising in either England or the US. The politicians are skilled at ratcheting back when needed, and allowing performative "debate" and controlled opposition.
Eh, I think the public should be armed. That puts the fear in the parasite, to the point they're willing to use nuclear munitions on a population center. You know about that case, right?
Most western citizens agree.
But we cannot ignore the information war because our ancestors won a ballistic war for us.
Of course. The public must also develop information distribution, countermeasures to electronic warfare and complete self-defense network systems which yes - does involve capturing, interrogating and removing the state-sponsored terrorists they send to silence what they deem "wrongthink".
Guns will protect you, at least in some situations, at least sometimes. That means that whoever wants to subjugate you will avoid these situations and will have a more difficult job.
I often think the 2nd amendment is a mistake because it allows you to live in essentially the same society but because you still have "muh guns" and are allowed to shoot them on your farm and pretend you're better than the UK.
It's a difference without differentiation.
You keep thinking that because you have guns pointed at the door so to speak, the government will come in through your door rather then your window.
Just like Red Dawn huh?
Whites need to bring their superior government to south asian countries
Nah. You can't fix that level of shit ever. We struggle to keep the US going with barely under 100 IQ people, imagine having to run countries full of 80 IQ retard street shitters. Isn't going to happen. Wall them off and let them either figure it out, kill each other, or starve.
While that's a very humanitarian ideal, I'd rather use a gamma ray burst weapon, then leave the region as a nature reserve.
Nice fantasy, but the left has forever tainted the legacy of the colonial improvement of middle-of-nowhere hell-holes populated by street-shitting cretins who venerate rats and cows.
Leave them to themselves to rot.
I'm having a deja-vu. Has this subject come up before?
Kicked out, left voluntarily, same diff really.
Lol
Why did you switch accounts before replying here? Deleting these accounts and making yet another won't help you not be obvious. I suppose it's not technically your fault that you're too retarded to not be obvious, but even a 'tard like you ought to be able to find a better hobby.
Your goals are as retarded as you are. I obviously overestimated you. You're too retarded to find a better hobby, because you're clearly too much of a tard to coexist with real people.
Lies. Here's you stating that you force children to get married simply to make them suffer.
https://archive.is/oYKgl#selection-2369.0-2369.132
It's not sarcasm; it is your true desires, subhuman filth.
Shame it doesn't benefit seamonkeys like you
Why? Did your incel friends give up on you too
Probably running out of american taxpayer money.