You will NEVER satisfy the feminists
(www.news.com.au)
Comments (51)
sorted by:
I have a better idea. Maybe women should be barefoot, pregnant, and chained to the stove at home instead. Women only have "rights" because men have allowed them to. Keep pushing for shit like this and men will start having second thoughts about that decision.
Although this is Australia we are talking about. Judging by the way they responded to Covid, their "men" would probably roll over and accept this.
Since they hate us so much we should stop protecting them at all. The guys who stood by as that bitch was robbed had the right idea. They're never going to stop until they experience consequences that they're not shielded from.
Was it australia where a cop blasted a woman point blank with mace/tear gas for 'not wearing a mask'?
Probably. Same country that trampled grannies with horses so would make sense.
Feminism is the politicization of female nature. That’s why the “top feminists” are all barren man haters. Modern Maenads are a political convenience for any group that wants power in a “democracy”
Sadly, even conservative women are often tricked by the appeals of feminism. It's like a gateway drug for them. I've noticed lately that some of the more traditional and conservative women that I know have been getting influenced by liberal friends and family, and I increasingly hear them use feminist rhetoric during conversations.
The vast majority of "conservative" women have no qualms about abusing the feminist divorce courts to destroy their husbands. They're only trad when it's convenient, which is no different than the danger hairs. Tradthots keep getting outed as OF whores because the only difference between the two is the form the grift takes. It's the same whore regardless of which mask she's wearing at the moment.
Yes, agreed. I've seen the online tradthot grift has gotten popular, but the women I was referring to aren't online influencers. They're stay-at-home Christian mothers, so there isn't an audience for them to virtue signal to, except their husbands.
One of the women that I know was married to her husband for several decades before deciding to divorce him. Took the kids and half his money, and immediately got re-married to another man. Divorce rape is very much real.
Uhh how did she take the kids after being married several decades? How old are these kids? Were they raising their grandchildren?
Not trying to undermine the conclusion though. Divorce rape is real and women who pretend to be conservative or not feminist will not hesitate to use divorce courts to their advantage.
In her case her kids were spaced out over the course of about 20 years, so some of them were already over 18, but not all of them.
What a stupid comment. The vast majority of conservative women aren't taking their husbands to "feminist divorce courts", leaving your mind reading aside.
Also, it's like proglodyte comments about Trump: HE USES THE LAW TO PAY AS LITTLE TAXES AS POSSIBLE! OMG!
The vast majority of “conservative women” : support title IX, child support, alimony, the draft for men only, the right for women to vote without responsibility, the forced hiring of women through “equality”, on and on. They’re only really conservative when it comes to troons and their own children.
If "the draft for men only" is feminist, AOC must be an anti-feminist.
Come on AoV, that’s lazy even for you. AOC saying something she would never actually support or do is this thing called virtue signaling, I’m sure you’ve heard of it before.
I don't think it is. I think it fits well with their belief that there is no difference between men and women. It is not a coincidence that it is cultural liberals pushing for this and cultural conservatives opposing.
Besides, neither men nor women are going to be drafted, so in that sense, you are correct that it is an empty virtue-signal.
Hope she sees this bro!
Who is 'she' and why would she care that you made a total fool of yourself? And again here.
Feminism has gone on so long and so unchecked that its influence just exists its institutions aren't questioned on it. Divorce as it exists in the US was created mostly by the legal activism of Feminists during the mid 20th century. Most of the laws that exist and the standards that we know comes with divorced were set during this time such as "No Fault."
So if a conservative women gets divorced period without a major accusatory reason, let alone takes him to court about it at all, she is propagating the "feminist" divorce courts.
a woman cannot be conservative. the concept is alien to her. there is no such thing. women conform to their environment and the strongest male in her circle. they must do this to survive.
you really have no understanding of women and it is quite sad to see. you don't really "know" any women.
What? I know women often get their conservative views from their dad or their husband, but the women I was referring to are as conservative as women get. My point is that even the stay-at-home Christian mother on a farm ends up getting influenced by her city-dwelling liberal daughter due to them spending time together.
So they are slightly Left (only slightly because the Overton Window is massively Left) on most things with the exception of a handful of Right beliefs they inherited from other men.
Women can't live on the pile of illgotten gains from feminism and Liberal/Progressivism and then call themselves Conservative because they like Guns, Jesus, and Rural Living.
They are frightened that their ATMs and wagies will rebel against their exploitation. While it is a reasonable fear for any parasite, it is also inevitable.
Also, have an archive link: https://archive.is/mET8F
I had tried earlier but it just kept freezing about 40% through capture. so thanks
Here's a fun little exercise. Try reading this article but replace every instance of the word "men" with "immigrants".
Like it’s a crime against humanity that dudes rate women based on looks. Bro, I had a female friend from college straight-up tell me she and her other female friends rated the guys in our friend circle based on how much money they thought we could make (like an actual $$$ per year figure).
Conclusion: Get bent, don’t gaf about these guys yelling out ratings at girls. Also, I beat the salary rating the gals in college gave me, and that friend is now literally a mentally ill cat lady (twice hospitalized), so…
Yeah that shit cracks me up. She acts as if it's the wrost thing to ever happen to wahmen.
You might be able to satisfy them if you assert dominance over them and tell them their place is beneath you.
I'm actually serious on this, the few women who are ACTUALLY conservative, usually tomboys, you know what is the first thing they do? They go to men because they can't stand women and act as early bullshit detectors warning about which women are just there for drama. Even the really feminine guys prefer to hang with men over women, and social media has made them a thousand times worse thanks to reinforcing destructive behaviour.
I don't think I would say conservative women are usually tomboys...but I assume by "tomboys" you're probably referring to a type of woman that rejects the pettiness that often occurs in female cliques.
They're the ones that have too much logic and reasoning in their heads that when they see a difficult physical task, they ask how can they help to speed it up than whine about how you aren't doing it faster.
This bimbo has never once felt the back of a man's hand and it really shows.
So they're just going full unmask moment now. Where they now believe it is socially acceptable to air blatantly sexist ideas and are putting them out to the public to see the appetite for it. I do remember there was a proposal in the UK House of Lords for a male curfew that would require men to stay off the streets at certain times of the day.
It also reminds me of the UK health secretary who just yesterday had a BBC podcast published denouncing how the health service was "by men for men" and needed to be reset so it caters to women.
And the worse thing about all of this, the men in power will vote for their own obsolescence.
Yes, completely mask off.
I always think it's funny how they need to specify the target of the bad behavior, like that should matter. They really couldn't have just said, "we don't tolerate disrespectful behaviour against anyone"?
And everyone with a brain knew how that would turn out if it was actually done. The ones who were dumb enough to follow it wouldn't be the ones causing the problems in the first place, so attacks would in all likelihood increase.
I suspect such a thing would be like lockdown and allow exceptions for emergency service workers and essential utility workers. Can't have the sewers blocked during curfew!
you will never satisfy them, but you will be made to obey them. many of you already do.
Interesting points. Now let's see infanticide statistics.
That is why they're so fat.
But I think that's irrelevant. Even if they could be satisfied, why on earth would you try to satisfy nutcases?
Comment Reported for:
Comment Approved: The post wasn't even reported