You will NEVER satisfy the feminists
(www.news.com.au)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (51)
sorted by:
What a stupid comment. The vast majority of conservative women aren't taking their husbands to "feminist divorce courts", leaving your mind reading aside.
Also, it's like proglodyte comments about Trump: HE USES THE LAW TO PAY AS LITTLE TAXES AS POSSIBLE! OMG!
The vast majority of “conservative women” : support title IX, child support, alimony, the draft for men only, the right for women to vote without responsibility, the forced hiring of women through “equality”, on and on. They’re only really conservative when it comes to troons and their own children.
If "the draft for men only" is feminist, AOC must be an anti-feminist.
Come on AoV, that’s lazy even for you. AOC saying something she would never actually support or do is this thing called virtue signaling, I’m sure you’ve heard of it before.
I don't think it is. I think it fits well with their belief that there is no difference between men and women. It is not a coincidence that it is cultural liberals pushing for this and cultural conservatives opposing.
Besides, neither men nor women are going to be drafted, so in that sense, you are correct that it is an empty virtue-signal.
Hope she sees this bro!
Who is 'she' and why would she care that you made a total fool of yourself? And again here.
Feminism has gone on so long and so unchecked that its influence just exists its institutions aren't questioned on it. Divorce as it exists in the US was created mostly by the legal activism of Feminists during the mid 20th century. Most of the laws that exist and the standards that we know comes with divorced were set during this time such as "No Fault."
So if a conservative women gets divorced period without a major accusatory reason, let alone takes him to court about it at all, she is propagating the "feminist" divorce courts.