Win / KotakuInAction2
KotakuInAction2
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
KotakuInAction2 The Official Gamergate Forum
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

71
Crowder is dropping leaked audio from a navy advisor saying they’ve lowered the minimum score on the asvab to 10
posted 2 years ago by Ahaus667 2 years ago by Ahaus667 +71 / -0

It used to be a score under 50 required a waiver of competency. The navy no longer requires a ged or hs diploma to join, and have expunged fitness scores to retain recruits.

43 comments share
43 comments share save hide report block hide replies
Comments (43)
sorted by:
▲ 32 ▼
– BollocksToBolsheviks 32 points 2 years ago +32 / -0

The military has, for more than a century, utilized standardized aptitude testing and IQ tests because they know damn well that below a certain point a soldier is more a a liability than an asset. And they know no amount of training will change this. I believe that there is a law that prohibits inducting anyone with an IQ below 82. Of course they don't IQ test anymore. This will be a disaster.

Edit: Double checked my statement and the law bit seems incorrect. I got this from J Peterson ("fact checkers" did the 'he is essentially but not technically correct bit'). His point that below a certain point of intelligence the military knows from long experience that such people are not useful and probably damaging still stands.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 23 ▼
– BlueHellScapeRefugee 23 points 2 years ago +23 / -0

I believe that there is a law that prohibits inducting anyone with an IQ below 82.

There's no way they could meet their diversity quotas if this was strictly enforced.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 10 ▼
– current_horror 10 points 2 years ago +10 / -0

If I had to guess, the average black soldier probably has a higher IQ than the average black civilian.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 8 ▼
– BlueHellScapeRefugee 8 points 2 years ago +8 / -0

I'd say it's almost guaranteed. They are (or were) selecting the most intelligent blacks that try to enlist, so the higher IQ ones are definitely over represented.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– Kaarous 6 points 2 years ago +6 / -0

No, definitely not.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– LesboPregnancyScare 6 points 2 years ago +6 / -0

that was probably true in the before DEI era. IQ tests were banned long before the DEI era too, and for the same reasons.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– deleted 2 points 2 years ago +2 / -0
▲ 18 ▼
– Grant_us_eyes 18 points 2 years ago +18 / -0

Their recruitment numbers must be alot worse than they'll admit to if they're jumping through hoops this badly.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 18 ▼
– Kaarous 18 points 2 years ago +18 / -0

Uh... What.

You could guess randomly and get higher than that. To get lower than a fifty you need to be genuinely stupid. I took my asvab hung over and got a 99 with a GT of 160.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 14 ▼
– Wizardslayer 14 points 2 years ago +14 / -0

Friend of mine did recruiter duty for awhile and there was a girl that kept taking the test and couldn't get anywhere close to whatever the minimum navy score was. She barely qualified for the army but only wanted to go navy.

My friend fired up a practice test and put C for every answer. Realized that would probably give her enough right answers to qualify. Told her this and sure enough she just managed to reach the min score.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– Ahaus667 [S] 7 points 2 years ago +7 / -0

When I was getting out I Christmas treed my advancement exam, caught shit from my command, not because I did the worst, but because they realized I Christmas treed the answers

*forgot to add, 3 people still managed to do worse than me

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– Ahaus667 [S] 7 points 2 years ago +7 / -0

I got a 94 hung over and offered afit, nuke and is, their faces when I turned it all down to skip the waitlist was hilarious.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 9 ▼
– Kaarous 9 points 2 years ago +9 / -0

I just asked the recruiter which one had the biggest signing bonus.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 8 ▼
– Deadlaw 8 points 2 years ago +8 / -0

… so that was nuke, right? Funny how this community exists and how concentrated factors are here…

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 10 ▼
– Ahaus667 [S] 10 points 2 years ago +10 / -0

Nuke had a 20k signing bonus back in the day when I was in, not sure if it’s changed since then.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 9 ▼
– Kaarous 9 points 2 years ago +9 / -0

Army not Navy. It was Satcomm. 80k.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– Smith1980 7 points 2 years ago +7 / -0

You would almost have to try to get a 50

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 8 ▼
– Ahaus667 [S] 8 points 2 years ago +8 / -0

I met 2 Seabees who were waivers at 45~ asvabs, dumber than shit but salt of the earth hard workers, both Appalachian boys, they probably would have gotten at least a 60 if they had some prep.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 8 ▼
– Smith1980 8 points 2 years ago +8 / -0

What is the lowest you can score?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– Ahaus667 [S] 7 points 2 years ago +7 / -0

I’m pretty sure a 10 is filling out your name correctly and answering a few fundamentally easy questions. I’ve never met anyone who got below the 2 Seabees, so I’m guessing.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– Kaarous 4 points 2 years ago +4 / -0

The lowest I've ever seen is a fifteen. Dude looked like he had fetal alcohol syndrome.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 13 ▼
– Sneak_King 13 points 2 years ago +13 / -0

This didn't work the first time and it won't work now. This time it's not just an isolated experiment, though.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_100,000

permalink save report block reply
▲ 11 ▼
– AlfredicEnglishRules 11 points 2 years ago +11 / -0

When the air force has the highest requirements to get in...

permalink save report block reply
▲ 11 ▼
– Ahaus667 [S] 11 points 2 years ago +11 / -0

The Air Force is able to be choosy because they have the cushiest jobs/ deployments. Being on a flight team to Germany or Bahrain is way better than 6 months in a shithole FOB trying to trade MREs so you can actually take a shit that day.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 9 ▼
– BlueHellScapeRefugee 9 points 2 years ago +9 / -0

My dumb whore neighbor who has 3 different spic baby daddies tried to join the Navy and failed the ASVAB, and I figured it was for the best. Then she managed to land a paralegal job because she's good with her mouth and I pity whoever is represented by the lawyers she works for.

The navy no longer requires a ged or hs diploma to join

I'm guessing the Army is the same way, and it was only around 20 years when the Army started requiring a diploma instead of accepting GEDs as they had previously. I remember in high school they kept warning us about it because some guys figured they could drop out and enlist with a GED.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 8 ▼
– Smith1980 8 points 2 years ago +8 / -0

Wow. I remember studying for the ASVAB for a few weeks

permalink save report block reply
▲ 10 ▼
– BoberFett 10 points 2 years ago +10 / -0

I remember not studying at all and scoring 99, because it's a pretty simple test. If someone can't score a 50, they're probably functionally retarded.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 9 ▼
– Smith1980 9 points 2 years ago +9 / -0

I was very paranoid and that’s the type of person I am. It was easier than I thought but I’d rather study too much and find out it wasn’t so bad than the other way around

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– deleted 6 points 2 years ago +6 / -0
▲ 4 ▼
– 83671R18 4 points 2 years ago +4 / -0

Hey, neat. I've always wanted to borrow a yankee aircraft carrier.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– TomSeeSaw 4 points 2 years ago +4 / -0

Meat for the grinder is all they need. You're in the navy now!

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– aldagautr 2 points 2 years ago +2 / -0

just gearing up to turn these soldiers on dissident Americans

permalink save report block reply
▲ 20 ▼
– deleted 20 points 2 years ago +20 / -0
▲ 24 ▼
– Ahaus667 [S] 24 points 2 years ago +24 / -0

Don’t forget immediate oth discharges for female pregnancies, making women who do want to serve meet the same physical requirements not just for offs but actual labor requirements of the position. For shits and giggles we one time had about 12 females try to lift a zodiac, they couldn’t even lift it off the well deck let alone move it. This was about a decade ago now, it clearly hasn’t gotten better.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– Happygo 4 points 2 years ago +4 / -0

Why are women in the military anyway. Or police. Or anything requiring masculinity.

It's to destroy these institutions.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 23 ▼
– deleted 23 points 2 years ago +23 / -0
▲ 23 ▼
– Kaarous 23 points 2 years ago +23 / -0

Too much work. Ban them from service and reconstitute the women's service corps. Just watch how few takers you get if they have to wear dresses and heels.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 9 ▼
– LesboPregnancyScare 9 points 2 years ago +9 / -0

Let people stay as long as they want, at the rank they want.

that would help a lot of people but the pay scale would have to change

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– deleted 2 points 2 years ago +2 / -0
▲ 12 ▼
– Assassin47 12 points 2 years ago +12 / -0

What about this aptitude testing? Capable people no longer have interest in the service, for good reasons.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 10 ▼
– BoberFett 10 points 2 years ago +10 / -0

I would dismantle every branch of the military. Standing armies are unconstitutional.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– deleted 3 points 2 years ago +3 / -0

Original 8chan Links to Gamer Gate:

.

The main GG discussion is on the videogames board: https://8chan.moe/v/

.

GamerGate archive is at https://8chan.moe/gamergatehq/

.

GamerGate Wiki:

https://ggwiki.deepfreeze.it/index.php/Main_Page

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Rules:

.

ONE: Do not advocate for illegal violence or post other illegal activity. (Be aware of your local laws.)

.

TWO: Don't threaten, harass, or impersonate users. Also: don't be a psycho. New users will be held to a higher standard.

.

THREE: Do not post porn.

.

FOUR: NSFW/NSFL content must be flaired NSFW.

.

FIVE: No vote manipulation. Do not break communities.win's features.

.

SIX: No spam or reposts. Do not make more than 5 threads a day.

.

SEVEN: Do not post falsehoods and hoaxes that are obvious to an uncontroversial degree.

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Moderation Logs:

.

(Two different versions, Scored has more features and is cleaner, but .win let's you see a few more details in certain instances.)

  • Scored
  • .win

Moderators

  • DomitiusOfMassilia
  • C
  • BandageBandolier
  • CarmenOfSandiego
  • The_Shadow_of_Intent
  • SocraticMethod1
  • Kienan
  • Smith1980
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026.02.01 - 8wn6p (status)

Copyright © 2026.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy