No, not the disease itself. Despite media's renewed attempts to scaremonger about it, just don't go to any piss orgies and don't have sex with black crackwhores and you're fine.
Plenty of us remember how it went the last time. A new infectious disease starts spreading almost solely among homosexual men, media try to whip up a new frenzy like with the coof, people notice it's a gay disease that spreads exactly like GRIDS, then a couple of small children adopted by gays get infected, then a dog, and then the whole thing disappears from media like someone flipped a switch.
That was two years ago, which might as well been in the Pleistocene as far as the normie is concerned, and it's an election year in the US, so it's time for round two. Mpox cases are far outpacing last year's numbers, CDC reports.
Here's the thing, though - It wasn't just a couple children infected, as people tend to remember based on news report from the last time, it was dozens:
During May 17–December 31, 2022, 125 probable or confirmed U.S. monkeypox (mpox)† cases were reported among patients aged <18 years, including 45 (36%) in children aged ≤12 years. Eighty-three cases in persons aged <18 years diagnosed during May 17–September 24, 2022 were previously described (1); 28 (34%) of these were in children aged ≤12 years, 29% of whom did not have reported information on exposure. Among 20 (71%) of 28 patients with documented information on exposure, most were exposed by a household contact.
During September 25–December 31, 2022, 17 children aged ≤12 years with probable or confirmed mpox were identified through national surveillance. CDC provided a questionnaire to state and local health departments for collection of the child’s history of exposure to any person with mpox§ during the previous 3 weeks, exposure settings, types of contact (e.g., skin-to-skin, being held or cuddled, diaper change, or toilet use), and precautions taken by the person with mpox (e.g., practiced isolation or covered lesions). This activity was reviewed by CDC and was conducted consistent with applicable federal law and CDC policy.¶
Three of the 17 pediatric patients were aged ≤7 days and had likely perinatal exposures; all three neonates were non-Hispanic Black or African American (Black). Two of these three mpox cases in neonates were previously reported (2). Ten of the remaining children were aged 0–4 years, and four children were aged 5–12 years. Nine patients were boys, and five were girls; nine were Black, two were Hispanic or Latino, and three were non-Hispanic White. Seven of the children aged 0–4 years, and two of those aged 5–12 years had known exposure to a person with mpox (Table); in five cases, the exposure source was unknown. Six of the seven children aged 0–4 years and both children aged 5–12 years known to be exposed to mpox were exposed by a caregiver or a household contact. Five of nine children with known exposure to a person with mpox were reported to have had close physical contact; notably, four of five children aged 0–4 years had skin-to-skin contact. Five of the nine children were exposed to a person with mpox who reported taking at least one precaution, including four persons who reported isolating. Two of these household contacts reported sharing a bed, bedroom, or bathroom with the child.
During the study period, 1.3% (1,118/84,614) of confirmed mpox cases globally were in patients <18 years of age. Most (61.8%, 691) were from the WHO Region of the Americas, followed by the African Region (30.3%, 339), the European Region (7.5%, 84), the Eastern Mediterranean Region, (<1%, 3), and the Western Pacific Region (<1%, 1) (Figure 1). No cases in patients <18 years of age were reported from the South-East Asia Region.
Data on self-reported sexual behavior were limited for mpox case-patients <18 years of age. However, 37/166 (22.3%) of case-patients 13–17 years of age self-identified as men who have sex with men (MSM) (Table 1). Eleven cases involved persons living with HIV, 1 of whom was immunosuppressed. Another 6 case-patients reported immunosuppression, as defined by their care providers, that was caused by undisclosed medical conditions. Overall, 67/293 (22.9%) of cases with information provided had a stated epidemiologic link to a known mpox case.
The CDC and the NIH obviously can't be expected to do any kind of analysis that might potentially produce politically incorrect results, so there's nothing in there about homosexuality at all, but that's not surprising. I just thought I'd add some horrifying details about the whole thing since I saw it mentioned last night in a comment, and I saw these citations on Kiwifarms earlier.
It was darkly funny how quick Monkeypox dropped out of news cycle when normies started putting 2+2 together that it was a sexually transmitted disease prevalent in gay communities then 'out of nowhere' a dog and a child raised by a gay couple 'happened' to get it...
It's probably a good thing I'm not in a position power, not just because I would be ruthless and oppress you all equally but given the evidence over the past years, I'd designate the LGBTWHATEVER community as a CBRN threat to humanity given the level of 'biological' threats they produce..
Russia is getting there
They do still have the old gulag infrastructure for containment..
What infrastructure? Most of the time the just dumped a bunch of political prisoners out in the middle of nowhere, knowing that any who attempted to escape would either freeze, starve, or get eaten by wolves.
Exactly! It's perfect for prisoners unlike the US or China where there is a risk of them living after the escape long enough that they become a threat again! /s
The new Leper colonies.
fags should be sent straight to Black Dolphin, hopefully we'll get there this decade
Hmmmm child abuse in minority communities? Impossible, white people are the ones with the incest problem. That's why black people use "inbred" as a racial slur. They can't be wrong... can they? Lol who am I kidding, hood baby daddies are the only demo that rapes grandmothers. Of course their kids aren't safe.
Which is funny, given the rate of fatherlessness in the black community, accidental incest must be shockingly high.
Given the lack of impulse control in the black community, intentional incest must be shockingly high as well.
I'd really love to know the true number of that. It might be much higher than what people anticipate. That would cause tons and tons of issues and would explain some stuff..
This explains a lot, good digging.
No, it's transmitted through skin contact with an infected area. So maybe some of the people didn't fuck their kids, they just rubbed them with their sores.
Actually makes me wanna gag. I don't know any parent who would willingly risk their kid catch their disease. How exactly does the disease work with sores etc? On hands or more on the netherregions?
You can get the sores pretty much anywhere, depending on where you made physical contact with an infected person. Most of the time, since this is a gay disease spread through orgies, it's around the asshole or on the face. There was a picture floating around, back during the original panic, of some faggot who got it real bad on his face. He was smirking in the photo as half his fucking face was rotting off. He looked so pleased with himself, like he finally caught them all.
But you can get it on your hands by touching someone else, too. Or your feet, or wherever else. It just gets on your skin and starts festering.
Okay, hands makes it easier to explain and not lose all hope in humanity. Otherwise we would have to assume almost all kids got fucked or something which I would rather avoid thinking about without getting angry. Thanks for the explanation.
Catching it any other way is as likely as catching herpes from a toilet seat. Every one of these cases should have been investigated and ended with a hanging.
Nothing is transmitted exclusively through sex. Sex just has a lot of blood and internal body contact, especially if done anally which very easily results in anal microfissures, tiny scratches which allow blood interaction.
Maybe they were sharing needles with the children? A bad blood transfusion in a hospital?
A dog, if it had an open sore in its mouth and bit a pocked individual and got infected blood into the open sore, could have a transmission that way. That is often how vampire bats wind up being such strong disease vectors, lots of blood contact. So "only through", no. But the same can be said of syphilis, herpes, and gonorrhea.
Now check veterinary records.
Talk about fudging the numbers.
Sorry, I'll show myself out.
From the WHO website:
Transmission
Person-to-person transmission of mpox can occur through direct contact with infectious skin or other lesions such as in the mouth or on genitals; this includes contact which is
The virus then enters the body through broken skin, mucosal surfaces (e g oral, pharyngeal, ocular, genital, anorectal), or via the respiratory tract. Mpox can spread to other members of the household and to sex partners. People with multiple sexual partners are at higher risk.
Animal to human transmission of mpox occurs from infected animals to humans from bites or scratches, or during activities such as hunting, skinning, trapping, cooking, playing with carcasses, or eating animals. The extent of viral circulation in animal populations is not entirely known and further studies are underway.
People can contract mpox from contaminated objects such as clothing or linens, through sharps injuries in health care, or in community setting such as tattoo parlours.
The WHO has no credibility. Anything they say should be taken with lots of grains of salt. Or better yet, ignored completely.
It's true, the WHO is a compromised and disgraced organization, but any other source would probably say the same.
They're lying about it being anything but a disease spread by guys having sex with people's asses.