Win / KotakuInAction2
KotakuInAction2
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
KotakuInAction2 The Official Gamergate Forum
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

34
Is it wrong to want characters like this? Disney Think So... (media.scored.co)
posted 2 years ago by FatalConceit 2 years ago by FatalConceit +34 / -0
25 comments share
25 comments share save hide report block hide replies
Comments (25)
sorted by:
▲ 26 ▼
– SoctaticMethod1 26 points 2 years ago +26 / -0

Microsoft too given their latest statements...

Feels like, at least above the actual customer base, the West have forgotten the importance of beauty especially in a product and act surprised when they lose money while the East who haven't forgotten rake in the money.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 26 ▼
– FatalConceit [S] 26 points 2 years ago +26 / -0

I think there's a general directive from above, i.e the ESG Komissat

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 16 ▼
– SoctaticMethod1 16 points 2 years ago +16 / -0

That might've been the starting point but I genuinely believe they've forgotten how to depict beauty.

With ESG running low, it'd make sense to pivot and add some more sex appeal to sell on titillation to cover for lack of originality. The fact they haven't makes me suspect they've forgotten what IS appealing to the average person.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 15 ▼
– FatalConceit [S] 15 points 2 years ago +15 / -0

Sydney Sweeney has a somewhat curvaceous bodice, and in her recent Marvel movie you wouldn't have known it, but in the romcom Anyone But You which Sweeney was an Exec Producer on, she basically flaunts the goods. So Disney like Microsoft actively desexifying.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 8 ▼
– AgilePickle1123 8 points 2 years ago +8 / -0

Idk, she’s got some big mommy milkers but besides that she has that dead fish look in her face that I’ve seen a million times before. Not a single thought behind those eyes

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– lgbtqwtfbbq 7 points 2 years ago +7 / -0

Yeah this new batch of starlets is definitely a step down.

As bad a person as Harvey Weinstein was, at least he had good taste.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 9 ▼
– deleted 9 points 2 years ago +9 / -0
▲ 2 ▼
– misogynegro 2 points 2 years ago +2 / -0

I think that at least some normies have an idea of what's going on, but they're too scared to speak up. Especially since woke hall monitors are professionally trained in bullshitting and "polite" bullying, it takes a lot of skill to handle these types IRL without escalating things to a shouting match.

Just like white collar workplace bullies in general, they take advantage of the fact that most people are conflict-averse cowards, and will thus placate the crybaby with short-term concessions until the crybaby runs the whole place.

These types can't survive environments where people are unafraid to challenge them and have enough time to deconstruct their bullshit. But they know that they're at an advantage in controlled environments where you don't have the time to unpack their fallacious talking points, or the freedom to counter anything they say with anything but the most cucked, conciliatory nitpicks.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 22 ▼
– Lurker404 22 points 2 years ago +22 / -0

That's why they're shitting their pants over AI: people no longer need woke artists and they're losing control over what can and cannot be drawn.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 10 ▼
– GamingTheSystem-01 10 points 2 years ago +10 / -0

This post needs to be removed. If we allow this kind of low effort view baiting, the whole site will degenerate into porn posting in no time.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 8 ▼
– MargarineMongoose 8 points 2 years ago +8 / -0

I am inclined to agree.

It's just more fuel for my crusade against .jpg posting.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– DestinyDraw 3 points 2 years ago +3 / -0

An image from Stellar Blade would be more contemporary

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– CaptainDudeguy 6 points 2 years ago +6 / -0

I don't mind AI art but that's honestly a pretty shitty example. Her right arm is totally fucked up.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– NoAgendaReviews 7 points 2 years ago +7 / -0

It's sorta perfect for the point OP is making. Got the face/body good enough. Didn't need to say its ai because of the clear fuck ups. If it was done better, more folks would be looking for/questioning source.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– ModsAreAIDS 4 points 2 years ago +4 / -0

Her elbows are way too sharp.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– BwonsamdiTheDead 3 points 2 years ago +3 / -0

And her hand

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– Tundinator 4 points 2 years ago +4 / -0

AI is getting better it seems. Strap on the right and the pendant are missing a connection, but overall pretty good.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Sumsuch 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

Yea... and she's got a tiny little t-rex arm on the right...

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– KingLion7 4 points 2 years ago +4 / -0

Nice. What is this beautiful art from?

permalink save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– The_Shadow_of_Intent 6 points 2 years ago +6 / -0

AI art from one of the more popular models out there. One of the Anything versions if I had to guess. Some of them are so good at depicting fit girls, like better than most artists.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– ApparentlyImAHeretic 3 points 2 years ago +3 / -0

it depends on what the intended audience is. if the intended audiences is for under 13s, then no this is not appropriate. if the intended audience is for teens, then parental guidance is necessary. if the intended audience is for adults, have at it.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– RaceCreatesCulture 2 points 2 years ago +2 / -0

It has got to the point that only poorly programmed hobby games actually have characters and stories anyone actually wants.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– ShekelJa 2 points 2 years ago +2 / -0

Not at all

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– undecidedmask2 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

Depends on what you're making.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 0 ▼
– deleted 0 points 2 years ago +0 / -0

Original 8chan Links to Gamer Gate:

.

The main GG discussion is on the videogames board: https://8chan.moe/v/

.

GamerGate archive is at https://8chan.moe/gamergatehq/

.

GamerGate Wiki:

https://ggwiki.deepfreeze.it/index.php/Main_Page

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Rules:

.

ONE: Do not advocate for illegal violence or post other illegal activity. (Be aware of your local laws.)

.

TWO: Don't threaten, harass, or impersonate users. Also: don't be a psycho. New users will be held to a higher standard.

.

THREE: Do not post porn.

.

FOUR: NSFW/NSFL content must be flaired NSFW.

.

FIVE: No vote manipulation. Do not break communities.win's features.

.

SIX: No spam or reposts. Do not make more than 5 threads a day.

.

SEVEN: Do not post falsehoods and hoaxes that are obvious to an uncontroversial degree.

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Moderation Logs:

.

(Two different versions, Scored has more features and is cleaner, but .win let's you see a few more details in certain instances.)

  • Scored
  • .win

Moderators

  • DomitiusOfMassilia
  • C
  • BandageBandolier
  • CarmenOfSandiego
  • The_Shadow_of_Intent
  • SocraticMethod1
  • Kienan
  • Smith1980
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026.02.01 - pv4fp (status)

Copyright © 2026.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy