They were very eager to push Desantis when realistically, he had no chance whatsoever against Trump.
And the focus on Israel when they can easily handle that war themselves there's enough problems within the US.
The biggest thing was the Matt Walsh attempt to into the SBI crap. If they REALLY wanted to be useful or make progress, they'd have reached out to those that know about it, get a good grasp of it and then relay that to their audience.
No they went with the 'games bad indoctrinating children' angle which just showed they had no honest interest in doing anything but be a speed bump to the left.
The biggest thing was the Matt Walsh attempt to into the SBI crap. If they REALLY wanted to be useful or make progress, they'd have reached out to those that know about it, get a good grasp of it and then relay that to their audience. No they went with the 'games bad indoctrinating children' angle which just showed they had no honest interest in doing anything but be a speed bump to the left.
Jeremy of Geeks and Gamers said that he actually spoke with Matt Walsh and tried to educate him about video games. Walsh wasn't interested at all and Jeremy's take away was that Walsh knows nothing about video games and isn't interested in learning. So my personal opinion based off of that info is that Walsh is a dumbass boomer who was just trying to grift on the SBI situation.
They were very eager to push Desantis when realistically, he had no chance whatsoever against Trump.
Hindsight is 20/20. And if he had no chance and they knew it, they wouldn't have pushed him. Besides, DeSantis was a pretty great governor, and good people can support him. Good people do not support Nikki Haley.
And the focus on Israel when they can easily handle that war themselves
What focus, exactly, on Israel? Maybe Ben focuses on it, I don't know, I don't watch him - but it makes sense he'd care about it, and the others barely ever do.
The biggest thing was the Matt Walsh attempt to into the SBI crap
?
No they went with the 'games bad indoctrinating children' angle which just showed they had no honest interest in doing anything but be a speed bump to the left.
If you look at how the left reacts to people like Matt Walsh and Michael Knowles, or Candace for that matter, it certainly doesn't think they're just a speed bump.
The problem with your style of response is that you deliberately miss the forest for the trees. You can make excuses for a million different things but if you have to make a million excuses, something is wrong.
It’s the kind of response that is either deliberately obtuse
I remember there was this passage in MK where the Austrian painter describes how frustrating it was to have arguments with the juice. They would be intentionally dense about anything that went against their narrative and then the next day they would pretend the discussion never happened, so he would have to explain everything to them all over again.
And halfway through this argument you just casually own up to not watching the one guy who everyone is basing these criticisms on?
The claim was that the entire platform focuses on Israel. Which is false. I don't need to watch Ben Shapiro to know that. I'm also sure these critics don't religiously watch him, and yet they make the criticisms anyway.
or self-outing as being completely uninformed on the topic.
If not watching Ben Shapiro is being 'completely uninformed on the topic', are you anything else?
If any of these arguments on its own is not sufficient to establish your case, then maybe present a few of them. Also, like I said, considering that some of the same people who call Ben Shapiro 'controlled opposition' say the same about literally everyone, including Tucker, it does not require a genius to not take seriously the boy crying wolf.
Half this comment is you admitting you don't know what the fuck is going
And rightly so, because whatever 'SBI' is, I don't see that justifying calling Matt Walsh controlled opposition -as I'll repeat people here do to everyone, including Tucker.
This kind of low level, retarded trolling is getting old.
And if he had no chance and they knew it, they wouldn't have pushed him.
You can’t see it, but this is you going off the deep end. This is legitimately one of the most retarded things you’ve ever said, and that’s a high bar.
Incorrect. They were pushing DeSantis as long as they believed that he had a chance. They went very quiet about him when his chances tanked. They never backed Neocon Nikki. This directly contradicts your suggestion that they were pushing a candidate with no chance just to hurt Trump. It also would not have been good for their credibility.
Also ignoring for a moment that Trump is as pro-Israel as it gets. What's that all about, eh?
They were very eager to push Desantis when realistically, he had no chance whatsoever against Trump.
And the focus on Israel when they can easily handle that war themselves there's enough problems within the US.
The biggest thing was the Matt Walsh attempt to into the SBI crap. If they REALLY wanted to be useful or make progress, they'd have reached out to those that know about it, get a good grasp of it and then relay that to their audience.
No they went with the 'games bad indoctrinating children' angle which just showed they had no honest interest in doing anything but be a speed bump to the left.
Jeremy of Geeks and Gamers said that he actually spoke with Matt Walsh and tried to educate him about video games. Walsh wasn't interested at all and Jeremy's take away was that Walsh knows nothing about video games and isn't interested in learning. So my personal opinion based off of that info is that Walsh is a dumbass boomer who was just trying to grift on the SBI situation.
Hindsight is 20/20. And if he had no chance and they knew it, they wouldn't have pushed him. Besides, DeSantis was a pretty great governor, and good people can support him. Good people do not support Nikki Haley.
What focus, exactly, on Israel? Maybe Ben focuses on it, I don't know, I don't watch him - but it makes sense he'd care about it, and the others barely ever do.
?
If you look at how the left reacts to people like Matt Walsh and Michael Knowles, or Candace for that matter, it certainly doesn't think they're just a speed bump.
The problem with your style of response is that you deliberately miss the forest for the trees. You can make excuses for a million different things but if you have to make a million excuses, something is wrong.
I remember there was this passage in MK where the Austrian painter describes how frustrating it was to have arguments with the juice. They would be intentionally dense about anything that went against their narrative and then the next day they would pretend the discussion never happened, so he would have to explain everything to them all over again.
Weird how similar they are...
The claim was that the entire platform focuses on Israel. Which is false. I don't need to watch Ben Shapiro to know that. I'm also sure these critics don't religiously watch him, and yet they make the criticisms anyway.
If not watching Ben Shapiro is being 'completely uninformed on the topic', are you anything else?
That and he's controlled opposition himself. Not to mention a vax pusher and a sodomite.
If any of these arguments on its own is not sufficient to establish your case, then maybe present a few of them. Also, like I said, considering that some of the same people who call Ben Shapiro 'controlled opposition' say the same about literally everyone, including Tucker, it does not require a genius to not take seriously the boy crying wolf.
That's literally what SoctaticMethod1 did
Half this comment is you admitting you don't know what the fuck is going on but asserting You still know better regardless.
This kind of low level, retarded trolling is getting old. I'd figured you'd want to stop acting like a retard at some point.
It's endlessly going over the same things and then the next day they pretend to have never heard about it.
AoV doing his best to invoke the "I gradually began to hate them" meme in people with his antics.
And rightly so, because whatever 'SBI' is, I don't see that justifying calling Matt Walsh controlled opposition -as I'll repeat people here do to everyone, including Tucker.
Anyone who doesn't agree with you is a troll.
Are you a troll, jidf, or just stupid?
You've not heard of Sweet Baby Inc? Are you living under a rock?
You can’t see it, but this is you going off the deep end. This is legitimately one of the most retarded things you’ve ever said, and that’s a high bar.
Incorrect. They were pushing DeSantis as long as they believed that he had a chance. They went very quiet about him when his chances tanked. They never backed Neocon Nikki. This directly contradicts your suggestion that they were pushing a candidate with no chance just to hurt Trump. It also would not have been good for their credibility.
Also ignoring for a moment that Trump is as pro-Israel as it gets. What's that all about, eh?