Imagine working for NBC and having the audacity to call anyone irresponsible. Do you think we forgot NBC sat on the Weinstein story? How about Matt Lauer? Brian Williams? Tom Brokaw? Barbara Waters? Your entire network has been a laughingstock of corruption and liars for decades. Don’t even get me started on the retard Jim Kramer who has bots that bet against him and make money…
It surprises me that he is still employed, especially with how pervasive the meme is against him. The whole "Uh oh Jim Cramer just endorsed something, that means its going to fail catastrophically momentarily!" which is quite funny....especially when it fucking does
There's a fund that may be a meme that just bets against Jim Kramer. I don't believe that anyone can help you by giving you consensus wallstreet opinion, as that is baked into prices. I think people taking Kramer advice are looking for relatively more immediate profits than they should be. Unless you're going to get into frequent trading, which I don't think profits most people, you're better off investing in solid companies and keeping it there and not just looking to the next quarter.
IMO the one advantage that the individual investor has over a profession is patience. You do not have to justify quarterly reports to yourself. You can bet much longer term than WS thinks, and if you invest in good ones, you will beat the market in the end.
Yahoo? I'm actually not surprised then. I've heard that yahoo news comments section was based as fuck more than a few times. Still, Good on them fighting the programming
It's unusual. So many articles are just aggregated from far left sources and tend to have leftie support. And counter opinions are usually rejected, not censored because Yahoo doesn’t censor(they say that).
Her paternal grandfather was from a Jewish family (the original family surname being Medvedof), who arrived in the United States from the Russian Empire.
Of course Trump also has a jewish family and has a literal kabbalah teacher as he said in his own book, so its really just jew verses jew here
"Don't ever listen to the source of the information! Only ever listen to us, telling you second-hand what the source we hate said! It's far more responsible than ever hearing his opinion directly!"
It's irresponsible for "Rachel" to keep pretending that he's not obviously a man.
Imagine working for NBC and having the audacity to call anyone irresponsible. Do you think we forgot NBC sat on the Weinstein story? How about Matt Lauer? Brian Williams? Tom Brokaw? Barbara Waters? Your entire network has been a laughingstock of corruption and liars for decades. Don’t even get me started on the retard Jim Kramer who has bots that bet against him and make money…
I am regularly appalled at how Jim Kramer is tolerated by economists and the financial sector.
His sole purpose in life is to make working class and middle class gullible people lose their life savings.
It surprises me that he is still employed, especially with how pervasive the meme is against him. The whole "Uh oh Jim Cramer just endorsed something, that means its going to fail catastrophically momentarily!" which is quite funny....especially when it fucking does
There's a fund that may be a meme that just bets against Jim Kramer. I don't believe that anyone can help you by giving you consensus wallstreet opinion, as that is baked into prices. I think people taking Kramer advice are looking for relatively more immediate profits than they should be. Unless you're going to get into frequent trading, which I don't think profits most people, you're better off investing in solid companies and keeping it there and not just looking to the next quarter.
There was an actual inverse ETF on everything Jim picked called SJIM.
IMO the one advantage that the individual investor has over a profession is patience. You do not have to justify quarterly reports to yourself. You can bet much longer term than WS thinks, and if you invest in good ones, you will beat the market in the end.
The comments section is a breath of fresh air condemning this line of thinking
Yahoo? I'm actually not surprised then. I've heard that yahoo news comments section was based as fuck more than a few times. Still, Good on them fighting the programming
It's unusual. So many articles are just aggregated from far left sources and tend to have leftie support. And counter opinions are usually rejected, not censored because Yahoo doesn’t censor(they say that).
About 10 years ago she argued that "Objective Journalism" was irresponsible and was in favor of "Advocacy Journalism".
NPR's "On The Media" (their media watch-dog show) producer claimed "Objective Journalism" would "allow a despot to seize power".
These people are all scum and you don't hate journalists enough.
Rachel Maddow background
Of course Trump also has a jewish family and has a literal kabbalah teacher as he said in his own book, so its really just jew verses jew here
"Don't ever listen to the source of the information! Only ever listen to us, telling you second-hand what the source we hate said! It's far more responsible than ever hearing his opinion directly!"
You have been promoted to Wikipedia editor.
Rachel 'Russian Collusion Hoax Bombshell' Maddow.
Four years of "Bombshell!"
This creature should be forced to wear a tinfoil hat whenever she appears on television.
"YOUR HONOR, I OBJECT!"
On what grounds?
"BECAUSE IT'S DEVASTATING TO MY CASE!"
Lol yet Trump is getting more and more support despite them not airing his speeches.
more people care about what he has to say than you, maddow.
Especially since Richard is lying about his Y chromosomes.