John Money is the father of troonery. He pioneered the kiddy diddling that creates troons and invented the lie that gender and sex are distinct to legitimize it.
Let's also be sure to expressly point out here that everyone's favorite "Nazi book-burning" - images of which normies like to throw around with the unexamined implication that the idea was:
We Nazis hate books now, everyone go into your house and get your books so we can burn them because books are stupid.
...in fact consisted of books from Hirschfield's Institut für Sexualwissenschaft, which is not at all contested as a touchstone in the intellectual history of troonery from any side.
...Let's also point out here that both of these intellectual heroes of troonery we're Jewish.
Thanks in advance for the downvote(s) Mordechai from the JIDF.
Actually, their latest 'WPATH' (which is the world organization dedicated to troon amputations and Frankensteinery) guidance booklet has a chapter dedicated to the eunuch 'gender identity', written by two 'scholars' who were active on a board for castration fetishists (the subject of whose stories were often children), and one of whom wrote a Washington Post opinion piece calling on ISIS to castrate and use as eunuchs its prisoners rather than beheading them.
If being a eunuch is the result of enslavement, then it is an oppression that should be abolished.
Thus, Transgenderism is the tool of oppression to castrate innocent people and bond them into slavery. Therefore it should be eradicated in every aspect of public life.
I like the "read a book", particularly when they emphasize it as "Read. A. Book." They can never tell which books. Whenever I've asked them, there's no reply forthcoming.
Before 2019, it probably would have been Harry Potter, but now, they're fresh out of ideas on what you should read.
Certain cults throughout history have always treated apostates as if they were literally dead. The Jehovah's Witnesses are probably the best known ones in modern days that do this. If you come back into the fold, there's generally a ceremony that basically brings you "back from the dead" (a la Lazarus.)
but they completely lack self control and couldn't detach themselves from the brand, I'll bet most of them secretly bought it despite being loudly against it on Twitter
No, they still haven't decoupled themselves from the Harry Potter franchise. They're as obsessed with it as ever before; they just try to pretend that a heretic like Rowling didn't create it. And the funny thing about Hogwarts Legacy is that it's the only piece of Harry Potter media they attacked. Didn't see anyone attacking Universal Studios for their Harry Potter rides and attractions, Barnes and Noble for devoting entire shelves to Harry Potter books and merchandise in their stores, or LEGO for still producing and selling Harry Potter sets. No, it was just this one retarded game that drew all their ire for some reason. And personally, I wouldn't be surprised if the troons and Marxists screaming about the game still bought it because they just couldn't resist the temptation of living out their fantasy of attending magic high school.
No one ever can. Its always a book, or a study, or an "expert" (aka talking head or youtuber).
Because they know that if they reveal their sources, it'll show them to just be imbeciles repeating something they didn't bother to verify. Some other person said it, so it must be fact.
Imagine an author being so bad that a political party could have a night time event where all his books are burnt and the people then decide to genocide that guys race.
If David hadn't come forward and died in such a terrible fashion, Money probably would be considered an expert to be quoted every day.
The same way it took decades for Stanford or Millgram to stop being treated as literal gospel on human psychology, and only once it was revealed they simply called their experiments a success and forgot to tell people all the fine details of how they forced it to look that way.
Hermaphrodites are real but that's not trans.
Guys wanting to be a woman (and vice versa) has happened forever but that's not trans either and mainly it's a mental illness anyway if you're in a perfectly healthy body but feel you have the wrong sex!
Trans is only possible because of hormone therapy and destructive plastic surgery. Once civilization collapses and you lose access to your precious hormones, your body will reassert authority.
...Whether intentionally or otherwise, @BrieRussell3 is missing the point. John Money coined the term "gender" and brought the idea of "social constructivism" into the transgender argument, thus linking transgenderism to marxist dogma...
Transgenderism does not pre-date gender. Transgenders and Transgenderism is a ideology.
If you want to talk about hermaphrodites, fine, but you have no right to claim them, and they wouldn't recognize or tolerate you. Same thing when they try to abduct inter-sex people.
I believe if you follow their thinking "transsexual" would be more accurate. They believe trannies were always a man or woman (their gender) but born in the wrong body (their sex) so they must change their sex to match their gender. Hence "transsexual".
But if gender is a social construct how are they born with it eh?
John Money is the father of troonery. He pioneered the kiddy diddling that creates troons and invented the lie that gender and sex are distinct to legitimize it.
Now now, let's give Magnus Hirschfeld credit for being just as much of a vile filth monger.
Money just carried on what Hirschfeld started. Thank God for Uncle A, though. At least it set them back 80 years.
Let's also be sure to expressly point out here that everyone's favorite "Nazi book-burning" - images of which normies like to throw around with the unexamined implication that the idea was:
...in fact consisted of books from Hirschfield's Institut für Sexualwissenschaft, which is not at all contested as a touchstone in the intellectual history of troonery from any side.
...Let's also point out here that both of these intellectual heroes of troonery we're Jewish.
Thanks in advance for the downvote(s) Mordechai from the JIDF.
Claiming eunuchs is not the power play you think it is.
Also, indigenous tribes practiced cannibalism and slavery and scalping, etc. Are we supposed to pretend these things should all be acceptable too?
Actually, their latest 'WPATH' (which is the world organization dedicated to troon amputations and Frankensteinery) guidance booklet has a chapter dedicated to the eunuch 'gender identity', written by two 'scholars' who were active on a board for castration fetishists (the subject of whose stories were often children), and one of whom wrote a Washington Post opinion piece calling on ISIS to castrate and use as eunuchs its prisoners rather than beheading them.
https://wesleyyang.substack.com/p/of-eunuchs-and-wannabes
https://reduxx.info/top-academic-behind-fetish-site-hosting-child-sexual-abuse-fantasy-push-to-revise-wpath-guidelines/
https://reduxx.info/academics-involved-with-top-transgender-health-authority-publish-paper-on-choosing-castration/
Washington Post: Islamic State lacks key ingredient to make ‘caliphate’ work: eunuchs
I wish I were making this up.
It's fetishes all the way down. Bring back kinkshaming.
If being a eunuch is the result of enslavement, then it is an oppression that should be abolished.
Thus, Transgenderism is the tool of oppression to castrate innocent people and bond them into slavery. Therefore it should be eradicated in every aspect of public life.
Eunuchs are, by definition, never transgender.
They're not transitioning at all.
Tribals often had the bad habit of making the insane and the retarded their spiritual leaders ....
I like the "read a book", particularly when they emphasize it as "Read. A. Book." They can never tell which books. Whenever I've asked them, there's no reply forthcoming.
Before 2019, it probably would have been Harry Potter, but now, they're fresh out of ideas on what you should read.
In fairness they're in the process of burning them all.
Still Harry Potter, but you have to tear out all mentions of J.K. Rowling's name from it.
Hogwarts Legacy tried that. They even included a troon to repent for Rowling's heresy, and it's still a no go for them.
The left's purity circle quite consciously does not include a way to bring yourself completely back into grace.
It's a religion of punishment, not repentance.
Certain cults throughout history have always treated apostates as if they were literally dead. The Jehovah's Witnesses are probably the best known ones in modern days that do this. If you come back into the fold, there's generally a ceremony that basically brings you "back from the dead" (a la Lazarus.)
but they completely lack self control and couldn't detach themselves from the brand, I'll bet most of them secretly bought it despite being loudly against it on Twitter
No, they still haven't decoupled themselves from the Harry Potter franchise. They're as obsessed with it as ever before; they just try to pretend that a heretic like Rowling didn't create it. And the funny thing about Hogwarts Legacy is that it's the only piece of Harry Potter media they attacked. Didn't see anyone attacking Universal Studios for their Harry Potter rides and attractions, Barnes and Noble for devoting entire shelves to Harry Potter books and merchandise in their stores, or LEGO for still producing and selling Harry Potter sets. No, it was just this one retarded game that drew all their ire for some reason. And personally, I wouldn't be surprised if the troons and Marxists screaming about the game still bought it because they just couldn't resist the temptation of living out their fantasy of attending magic high school.
No one ever can. Its always a book, or a study, or an "expert" (aka talking head or youtuber).
Because they know that if they reveal their sources, it'll show them to just be imbeciles repeating something they didn't bother to verify. Some other person said it, so it must be fact.
Imagine an author being so bad that a political party could have a night time event where all his books are burnt and the people then decide to genocide that guys race.
don't mind me, just reposting this as a reminder
The biggest problem here is that they allege that money wasn't taken seriously.
He was taken deathly seriously, and celebrated. Right up until those kids died.
If David hadn't come forward and died in such a terrible fashion, Money probably would be considered an expert to be quoted every day.
The same way it took decades for Stanford or Millgram to stop being treated as literal gospel on human psychology, and only once it was revealed they simply called their experiments a success and forgot to tell people all the fine details of how they forced it to look that way.
That thread is a lot of seething and dilating.
Sorry - trans is BS.
Hermaphrodites are real but that's not trans. Guys wanting to be a woman (and vice versa) has happened forever but that's not trans either and mainly it's a mental illness anyway if you're in a perfectly healthy body but feel you have the wrong sex!
Trans is only possible because of hormone therapy and destructive plastic surgery. Once civilization collapses and you lose access to your precious hormones, your body will reassert authority.
Everything else is all BS.
...Whether intentionally or otherwise, @BrieRussell3 is missing the point. John Money coined the term "gender" and brought the idea of "social constructivism" into the transgender argument, thus linking transgenderism to marxist dogma...
john money should have died screaming, not peacefully of old age.
Transgenderism does not pre-date gender. Transgenders and Transgenderism is a ideology.
If you want to talk about hermaphrodites, fine, but you have no right to claim them, and they wouldn't recognize or tolerate you. Same thing when they try to abduct inter-sex people.
Transgenderism as a term or idea barely predates this generation.
Transsexualism does, but that's a slur and a no-no word so they need to be blatantly wrong and rewrite history to dodge having to say that.
True. It's a no-no word because it would be a bad idea to actually go over the history of retarded Leftist nonsense.
I believe if you follow their thinking "transsexual" would be more accurate. They believe trannies were always a man or woman (their gender) but born in the wrong body (their sex) so they must change their sex to match their gender. Hence "transsexual".
But if gender is a social construct how are they born with it eh?
At this point, maybe it's Maybelline.