He's a big supporter of Ireland
(media.kotakuinaction2.win)
Comments (35)
sorted by:
no refugee should be more than 100 miles from his nation's border
They'll never tell you this, but the law is that refugees are entitled to a safe country, not the country with the best gibs.
i heard isreal is the only safe democracy with human rights in the middle east. It seems closest to me.
First safe port of call.
After WW2, Israel was pitched as a kind of refuge for the beleaguered Jewish people. Now the time has come for it to pass to a new group of refugees.
#israelforthehomeless
Even normies are starting to see it. I find it hilarious.
Jews telling everyone else what to do with their
countiescountries. Checks out.How are they this shameless? Their reputation is right now at its lowest and they still pull this crap. Goddamn, I'm just amazed at this point. I get it, they are not monolith and all that jazz. If I was jewish, I would shut up about speaking this kind of platitude and encourage other jews to do the same.
hubris, they always over play their hands
As a Jewish man (on my mom's side), I think Israel should be taking all the refugees. Isnt it the responsibility of the country causing the exodus, to care for the people they're displacing?
Could have sworn America was shamed into taking a whole bunch of war refugees after Vietnam and Afghanistan blew up on us.
why do THEY want to pretty much destroy countries that helped them in WW2?? sure.. destroy Germany, whatever. but why France, UK, USA, Australia? They came and liberated them from nazi camps. It is super super strange.
If it really is a plan then it disproves the IQ claim. Destroy your allies by flooding them with people who want to genocide you. Ensure you have no where on earth to take refugee.
the frog asks the scorpion
Because they're easier targets.
ratio
Did you even need to ask?
Only if they are housed on the pro-palestinian protestors homes, then im all for it.
Is Congo fine for you?
But if you support them, you should house them. Why is it now not Ok to house these egyptians, syrians and jordanians? After all, even their native countries rejected them, but somehow you support them, so... it is only logical you should keep them at your home!
Hell, especially if they commit a crime, you should criminally answer for them!
Win-win-win!
You house them, you answer for their crimes and Israel gets rid of these Syrians!
It's frikken hilarious that your talking points pass for decent conversation on the boomercon blog I read. Boomers are so self-satisfied in their dumbness
I don't see any objections from you...
So you are in favor of them living in Jordan and Syria and Egypt? Because these fuckers are not natives from Israel.
You support them so much that you should house them, and go to jail for them. You are a filthy hypocrite, you love palestinians so much you are willing to side with commies.
Thanks for telling us you hate white people. Because instead of being against Palestinians, you support them so much that you are willing to make them eternal rapefugees. And willing to allow them in your country instead of favoring them to be resettled in their native countries like Syria or Congo.
You are the problem. I hope you get to house a particularly evil family.
Nope, they are not. Find me Arabic relics predating the Jewish people.
Fag.
And you care so much about what I say that you keep coming back.
Egypt is a safe country, there are plenty of space there for Palestinians, they can even cross the border on foot or using one of the many illegal tunnels they have in between Egypt and the land Palestinians occupy in Israel.
No Gazan should be taken as a refugee by any western country. Especially by people who support their own western nation.
The chance of importing Islamism and terrorism (or people who will become terrorists) is 100%
Boomers: if I had two bullets, and I was faced with an enemy and a traitor, I would shoot my grandchild twice.
"And then whine they'd used both bullets."