Then you ain't pro life, I'm atheist and I'm pro life because regardless of what argument you use to justify your action, you're terminating a new consciousness entering this world.
I'm not against contraception because that's on the slightly lower level as abstinence but still not erasing something. You can't even justify abortion to save the mother as with modern tech, you may as well try for both regardless.
What do the studies say have been happening to the women? I have read about birth control making women prefer effeminate men and losing their fear of risk. Anything else?
The included studies identified structural and functional changes in areas involved in affective and cognitive processing, such as the amygdala, hippocampus, prefrontal cortex and cingulate gyrus.
Basically out of all the 23 studies done so far every single one has shows everything from ability to reason to emotional state is impacted by hormonal regulation from birth control. This of course isn’t shocking to anyone whose met a tranny on hormones, but birth control and the control of estrogen has show a sharp decline in the ability to sense pheromones, an increased likelihood to develop depression and a higher risk of suicide.
This is one that goes into a good amount of what’s been done so far, and why they need to start studying it with all the girls going on the pill at 14-15 now
The changes that happen to a woman's body during pregnancy are pretty drastic. Makes me think it might be a sort of "second puberty" or the proper continuation of development.
There are philosophers, religious individuals and those, religious or not, who believe that sex is unitive (via marriage) and for conception and therefore contraception is an immoral and unnatural action that goes against that principle of denying a human life the right to exist and therefore should be banned (a return to the Comstock laws once the relevant Supreme Court historic decisions are overturned like Roe v Wade was for abortion). As far as these groups are concerned, contraception is pre-abortion and just as immoral and righteous to ban as abortion. It would form part of the anti-vice pushback and counteraction to what liberals have been implementing in the last few decades in terms of sexual liberation, not just against abortion, contraception, promiscuity and pornography but other forms of vice including alcohol, smoking and gambling.
Ironically, the people saying pro-life supporters are also pro-birth control and contraception are left leaning outlets! Maybe hoping that the right wing don't go for contraception as well as abortion as was the case in the past.
I remember back in the day when the old Feminist line was "Don't have sex if you aren't ready to be a parent" in response to the growing "financial abortion or otherwise" line about child support at the time.
Funny how that little bit of their history just ended and was never spoken of again once it turned on them.
It makes no sense as a man to marry a woman at all unless she is far richer than you, let’s be real. Outside of emotional/religious reasons, there is literally no upside for a man. If you’re the type of man who can score with women, you can get them to have your children and stick around without getting officially married anyway. If you can’t get laid/have children without getting a woman to marry you first, she’s planning on leaving/divorce raping you eventually anyway. It’s unfortunate, but officially tying the knot with a woman just makes it easier for you to get fucked over later on when she decides to leave (which, statistically speaking she will). But is she’s super rich, head to the chapel I guess because then if she leaves you get the payout… but how often does that scenario play out?
Then you ain't pro life, I'm atheist and I'm pro life because regardless of what argument you use to justify your action, you're terminating a new consciousness entering this world.
I'm not against contraception because that's on the slightly lower level as abstinence but still not erasing something. You can't even justify abortion to save the mother as with modern tech, you may as well try for both regardless.
It depends, there’s more medical studies coming out that show in all likelihood birth control has been creating these modern sociopaths we call women.
What do the studies say have been happening to the women? I have read about birth control making women prefer effeminate men and losing their fear of risk. Anything else?
Basically out of all the 23 studies done so far every single one has shows everything from ability to reason to emotional state is impacted by hormonal regulation from birth control. This of course isn’t shocking to anyone whose met a tranny on hormones, but birth control and the control of estrogen has show a sharp decline in the ability to sense pheromones, an increased likelihood to develop depression and a higher risk of suicide.
Holy crap. Do you have a link to these studies? I would like the full list of what the effects are. Would explain a lot.
There’s no definitive yet because it hasn’t been funded that much (for obvious reasons).
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7667464/
This is one that goes into a good amount of what’s been done so far, and why they need to start studying it with all the girls going on the pill at 14-15 now
Long term use of the pill reduces a woman's hypothalamus and pituitary gland volumes.
The changes that happen to a woman's body during pregnancy are pretty drastic. Makes me think it might be a sort of "second puberty" or the proper continuation of development.
There are philosophers, religious individuals and those, religious or not, who believe that sex is unitive (via marriage) and for conception and therefore contraception is an immoral and unnatural action that goes against that principle of denying a human life the right to exist and therefore should be banned (a return to the Comstock laws once the relevant Supreme Court historic decisions are overturned like Roe v Wade was for abortion). As far as these groups are concerned, contraception is pre-abortion and just as immoral and righteous to ban as abortion. It would form part of the anti-vice pushback and counteraction to what liberals have been implementing in the last few decades in terms of sexual liberation, not just against abortion, contraception, promiscuity and pornography but other forms of vice including alcohol, smoking and gambling.
Ironically, the people saying pro-life supporters are also pro-birth control and contraception are left leaning outlets! Maybe hoping that the right wing don't go for contraception as well as abortion as was the case in the past.
I agree. If you don't want a baby, don't fucking make a baby and have to kill it later.
I remember back in the day when the old Feminist line was "Don't have sex if you aren't ready to be a parent" in response to the growing "financial abortion or otherwise" line about child support at the time.
Funny how that little bit of their history just ended and was never spoken of again once it turned on them.
As is the case with all Leftist instances.
There is absolutely no evil that society will not tolerate in order to protect women from the consequences of their own decisions.
"It's just a toddler, he doesn't even pay taxes. Just do whatever makes you feel good sweaty"
It makes no sense as a man to marry a woman at all unless she is far richer than you, let’s be real. Outside of emotional/religious reasons, there is literally no upside for a man. If you’re the type of man who can score with women, you can get them to have your children and stick around without getting officially married anyway. If you can’t get laid/have children without getting a woman to marry you first, she’s planning on leaving/divorce raping you eventually anyway. It’s unfortunate, but officially tying the knot with a woman just makes it easier for you to get fucked over later on when she decides to leave (which, statistically speaking she will). But is she’s super rich, head to the chapel I guess because then if she leaves you get the payout… but how often does that scenario play out?
This all started when we let them replace "with child" with "pregnant"
If it wasn't an unborn human child you wouldn't want to kill it.
I want people like that to be redesignated from human being to fetus so that state approved murder can take place and no one will care.
Watch then flip their view on it real quick.
Random screenshot of a comments section with zero explanation designed to demoralize.
Fuck off with this garbage.