bruh, you enter a community and create "me versus you" threads full of nonsensical straw man arguments, and then you wonder why everyone here hates you.
Can you fuck off already? this place isnt the theocracy you keep trying to claim it to be . Many people here are not religious but dont care enough about the topic, to sperg about it like you do, because there are more important things to deal with.
If you want to be anti Christian and if you want to protect your precious jews, then go back to reddit and twitter which is full of jewish and jewish lovers hating on Christianity
I listened to you plenty, and even agreed with parts of what you said. Your response was to slam one of our most pleasant users based on scummy and incorrect reasoning.
atleast when i critique/mock christianity.I critique your holy book. typically surrounding gay people.
I am amazed that this is somehow the most important issue. By the way, Christians are right about homosexuality. They say nothing about 'gay people', who do not exist - desiring to have relations with a given gender does not put you in a separate ontological category. They disapprove of homosexuality, and if one looks at the past few years, one can see why. It was the trojan horse for a complete collapse in gender norms.
You can say that society should not approve of homosexuality without looking down on people who do engage in that behavior, some of whom are very worthy, like David Starkey. And that is the attitude of Christians.
Never once! did i make a post saying it's bad to be a christian.
And perhaps you didn't. If you didn't, then I don't understand why you take such issue with Christian attitudes towards homosexuality. You say Christianity is bad, but it's not bad to be Christian. While Christians say that homosexuality is bad, but it is not bad to have such inclinations.
say being christian makes you responsible for the horrendous shit! your religion did throughout history
Religions don't do 'horrendous shit'. People do. In some cases, it's arguable whether the teachings of the religion are responsible.
how many people here hate jews. but i never see one of you mother fuckers defend them. ya know? against people who want to do physical harm to jewish people.
No? You must not have noticed my comments about the Jews.
and their's very little, to no muslims here. if their were i'd be just up their ass, as i am yours.
Maybe, but experience shows that people who are very critical of Christianity remain silent in the face of Islam, even where there are many Muslims, as in Europe - and in fact often defend Islam and Muslims.
i love how their's someone impersonating me called u/Bluestorrn pretty cleaver using 2 R's and an N to make it look like an RM. rrn very creative... you, FUCKING BASTARD!
Claiming that a black user wasn't sperging out 24/7 to earn favor with the white people here. Ignoring, of course, that the way you earn favor with white people is to sperg about non-existent racism.
Ya know i'm not even gonna bother linking the bible verse that says it's ok to kill someone for lying with someone of the same sex.
It's still an action. It's not 'gay people', which is what you call people who are attracted to the same sex. Regardless, the Old Testament penal law is irrelevant for Christians. And before you make the tired old ignorant argument about shellfish, so is the ceremonial law. Only the moral law is applicable - meaning that homosexuality is considered immoral in Christianity, but there is no prescription for civil authorities on how to deal with it.
and often link it to... well that's putting mildly believe all gay people are pedophiles... and apparently disagreeing with that concept makes me a horrible person here. go figure.
Well, that's stupid. But why are you so concerned about what a bunch of marginalized people believe? Are you trying to save their souls?
the christians here clearly hate gay people.
The "Christians here" aren't exactly representative of Christianity, insofar that they are Christians. There's one guy who claims to be a Christian who says that he hopes that the Jews and Arabs (a significant minority of whom are Christians) just kill each other because they are "enemies of his race". Few ideas would be more anti-Christian and modern than that.
you are defending people who wanna strip away right from pedophiles i mean gay people
Which rights? Who decides that these are 'rights'? Obviously, what you call gay people are not universally or even mostly pedophiles, but the concept of 'gay rights' is very modern, and I reject modernity.
I'm willing to believe your an atheist posing as a christian then you actually being a christian to be honest.
You got it part right, in that I am an atheist, though not posing as a Christian. However, I do think that Christianity should be the foundation for Western civilization. I used to think that a world without religion would be more humane and rational, and then the concept of 'pregnant man' appeared.
I don't. The ones I appreciate or appreciated to some extent in the past often do critique Islam, and in fact, do so appropriately more so than Christianity. Folks like Hitchens, Dawkins and Harris (who was bearable before his TDS).
That said, this does not apply to Reddit-tier 'atheists', who are just anti-Christian. You may have the justification that you're talking to people who (you think) are mostly Christians, in mostly attacking Christianity, but they don't.
it's not
You got in someone's mind so much that he decided to create an account just to attack you.
24/7 seems like a stretch bro. i atleast take a few days off from my sperging. and what non-existent racism? you mean against white people or non white people? i am legit confused by that last part
The kind people like Ta Nehisi Coates and Nicole Hannah Jones and the rest of the three name brigade cry about. The way to success, fame and being adored by white people is to make up racism and complain about white people.
Normally i would go over all of this but it just dawned on me your bi sexual and probably lean more towards men then women. and i don't feel comfortable having a debate on this topic who's sexually repressed their gay side.
What a stupid comment. If I say that I'm bisexual, I'm obviously not "repressed" anything. In fact, you said that you don't like that you have homosexual desires, while I have no problem with it.
Fact is, you simply have no counter to what I have posted, and you try the cheap way out the same way you attempted to discredit Smith, which is really pathetic.
yet consider being gay an illness.
You're simply making up stuff.
religion as a concept is neither good nor bad. the past had it's problem under religion. like the future without religion will certainly have it's own set of problems
Correct. But like I said, the problem is with the idea that a world without religion is an improvement. While you try to blame 'pregnant men' on religious leftists, this sort of nonsense - and many other things - were never taken seriously when religion was.
And if your gonna use the "modern bad" excuse. then your cherry picking how barbaric we humans were at a time when religion was at it's highest.
Not at all, but it's clearly not necessary to be barbaric to take religion seriously. You can't really compare the state of man before the industrial revolution to today, and conclude that any change must be due to changes in attitude towards religion.
not to mention most if not of everyone today is religious but is doing dumb shit
I know barely anyone who is religious here in Europe.
Eh more so critiquing it. also, if many of the critiques i do is considered attacking. then they really need to shut the fuck about islam and the jews. because if critiquing is attack. but only for their! religion. then they have no leg to stand on.
Well, they should shut up about the Jews, insofar as it's usually completely irrelevant to any topic. That is the way you talked about it. Suddenly, there was a topic out of the blue, saying BIBLE BAD. That is not really a 'critique', that is just an attack. Now, if there is a terrorist attack and I criticize Islam as a result, yeah, that is appropriate. And frankly, it deserves to be (verbally) attacked. Why does Christianity deserve to be attacked?
Because I pointed out that the path to white people loving you is to whine about racism, like these blacks, and not point out reality, like Coleman Hughes, John McWhorter, Thomas Sowell and many other whose intellect is vastly greater than the clowns worshiped by whites?
i remember you saying something to the effect of. "while it would be nice for gay people to be out and openly gay with the degeneracy. it's long past that point. and i don't mind gay people going back into the closet if society can go back to normal" or something like that.
Yeah, I do think that what is happening right now is a vastly greater evil than homosexuals being in the closet. Civilization has survived the latter. Can we survive the former? Perhaps you will argue that it is 'unfair'. But there is no rule that life has to be fair. People are born with all sorts of things that screws them over in life.
You have a problem with gay people, and default to the bible to give you guidance
Neither is true. I don't have a problem with "gay people" (I don't think this should be an identity), nor with people who practice homosexuality. I have a problem with how the acceptance of homosexuality has opened the floodgates, or at least has coincided with, the opening of the floodgates of degeneracy.
instead of addressing why the gays act the way they do now. could be they pushed to fringe of society due to religion.
Then you would expect homosexuals to become more normal as their practices are more accepted. Maybe it is too soon to tell, but it certainly does not seem that way to me. With acceptance now taken for granted, it seems to be going the other way, and pushing the envelope with degeneracy like transgenderism, grooming and perversion.
What argument? and i didn't discredit smith. all i did was claim, that being black here is fine... if you suck enough white dicks.
You apologized to him only to accuse him now of 'sucking enough white dicks'? See, this is why no one likes you, and everyone likes him. Because you are obnoxious as hell if taken seriously, and he is quite possibly the most pleasant fellow here.
really? you don't see anything wrong with being gay?
That was not your claim. You claimed I see it as an illness, or something like that. You have nothing with which to back it up.
As for it being bad, I think it is bad on a societal level, not on an individual level. On an individual level, I only despise the activists.
Yeah but under religious hierarchy things like: tourettes, schizophrenia, autism. and other medical illnesses were treated as if they were the works of evil spirits...
You don't say, when people did not know what the hell was going on, they made up explanations that made no sense. If you're going to blame religion for this, you should blame medicine for bloodletting - as humors was the leading medical theory until recently.
neither religion, nor non-religion is perfect.
You said all crazy that to come to this eminently reasonable conclusion? C'mon. At least say religion is much worse than Nazism. With your statement I agree.
wanna oppose pregnant fucking man? you can do that as either an atheist or a believer. you don't need to be apart of something to oppose stupid.
I agree. But why are we moving towards 'pregnant men' as religion is being lost? Like with what you call 'being gay', this is not bad on the individual level (as an atheist may be more reasonable than a believer, like I am), but on a social level - it seems that if you don't believe in religion, you will fall for anything. Certainly, our descent into madness as religion is lost does not suggest that loss of religion is doing a great amount of good.
You do know some religious people view homsexuality as a mental illness right?
Depends on how you define mental illness. But it is a strange way for religious people to deal with a sin.
again man just admit that religion isn't perfect
Done. Religion isn't perfect. Now admit that we've gone to absolute hell since religion started declining.
Yeah but why was it barbaric in the first place? that should be where your mind should be going to when your wanting to impose religion as a culture norm. just saying.
Why was it.
and claiming any progress we made in this society was because of religion, instead of despite of it.
I never claimed that. Why do you keep making stuff up?
Yeah i don't know where you live in the EU buddy but... your full of shit man. and i know this is old being 2018 and all. but it seems like instead doing research. you just run your mouth.
Doesn't even work, but yeah, as for the people I know, almost no one is religious. You didn't think I was claiming to know the entire population, right?
Good question. because the people who are in support of the bible say and do dumb shit.
Wait, so let me get this straight. If people here liked the works of Shakespeare, and said 'dumb shit', you would be criticizing Shakespeare? What a weird way to go about things.
the gay thing being one. abortion being another. and race mixing... which alot of racist christians bring up...
It's just stuff you disagree with. It is not "dumb shit". I'm also pro-abortion, but I don't think people are dumb if they disagree with me as you do in your arrogance.
just because you agree with some tenets of the bible. doesn't mean everyone else does.
Well, you do. If you oppose so called 'racism', then that is a residue of Christian values. There is no Jew or Greek in Christ, after all, and Jesus is said to have commanded to make disciples of all the nations of the world.
Because people posing as me trying to ruin my life is a bad thing.
They're not 'ruining your life', or having any effect on your life.
it's like your saying if someone shits on me. that's a good thing.
Well, yeah. You think I mind downvotes?
so i would like it if you could just block me ok buddy? i don't block people. that's weak sauce, but i do take great pride when people block me so that's one less asshole i have to talk to.
If I'm the 'asshole' either on this forum or in this conversation, there is something seriously wrong with you. And if you take pride in being blocked, then you understand my argument that it's a mark of pride in having someone get so mad to create fake accounts - as they've also done for me.
You guys never listen....alot of people here think i'm...because you write off atheist so easily...you won't listen.
Once again, your issue is you obsess and spin out. You care what other people think, you make assumptions about people's opinions of you, and you're so fragile you can't handle the idea that even one person might not like you or, not might not have correctly understood you. I know other people like you. I get that you feel misunderstood.
But, again, it's not that you're an atheist. We have atheists here, as mentioned. You keep trying to stir up trouble, you lash you, you spam, you insult. People don't care about your opinions, they dislike your attitude and behavior.
And even the people who are nice to you, and try to help you, you lash out and insult and bully. You also tell everyone else what to do; 'leave,' 'ignore me (while I spam the shit out of everything and badmouth you),' 'die, asshole,' etc. You're unpleasant to everyone, because you are delusional about who everyone is. It's very unpleasant. There are plenty of people here who hate you, yes. There are also plenty of people who genuinely wish you the best. And you shit on everyone equally. Work on yourself, stop trying to control everyone else. Stop obsessing.
That is his biggest problem, and the biggest problem of a lot of people.
Though after seeing Jordan Peterson's latest podcast with the 'would be school shooter', I wonder if there is anyone who doesn't. This is a guy who was treated like dirt by literally everyone. It's easy for people who have the respect of their family, friends, employer, etc. to say that they don't care about what others think, but that's because everyone worth caring about does respect you.
There are also plenty of people who genuinely wish you the best.
While I also dislike his bad attitude, I don't think he's as bad as people make him out to be. He's spoken out against 'anti-white' BS, and it's not as if people come here pretending to be right-wing in order to fool people into buying other bad opinions (though people have accused me of that as well). That said, I also don't think his bad attitude can be fixed.
This is not exactly the place to learn to be a good or better person. But if you do want to be, you should apologize to Smith, and learn from him how to be a pleasant person.
It's also close to impossible to avoid hate. You think I'm some sort of crypto white supremacist or something, or at least a colored trying to curry favor with Stormfags. And yet they do hate me a lot. The way to not have an issue with being hated is to not care when people do hate you, particularly when it is not exactly the cream of humanity.
Musonius Rufus said it best, when he told a slave that instead of demanding that his master not beat him, he should learn to endure the beatings - because unlike the beatings, those are in his control. Obviously, this is extreme, but there's a lesson in that. You can't control whether other people hate you. But you can control your own reaction to it. Some people are more naturally immune to it, but don't you think that if you let pixels on a screen upset you in any way, you're giving people what they want?
In general, soapbox topics of "here's why you're wrong" aren't going to be well-received anywhere. So you should take hatred for granted if you're going to post stuff like that. Right or wrong.
At first, I was impressed, and then I read those three last pathetic paragraphs. First of all, you knew at the time that I'm not white, because I had just told you. Secondly, there are plenty of people here who are not racist, and who don't have people downvoting them all the time - e.g. Impossible (when not being retarded), Kienan, Gizortzik, me.
The semi-last paragraph makes ZERO sense. So of all the people here, some of whom say "the holocaust did not happen but it should have", you think you should have tagged one of the people who has never said anything racist, hateful or even unkind and called him a racist? Sorry, you are certifiably retarded. If you have more of a problem with one of our black users than the people who call black women 'sheboons', maybe the problem is you.
As for the rest of your reply... then white people should shut up about going through racism. christian should not interfere with me when i critique or mock their religion. men should take sexism on the wrist and just move on from it....
See, you're simply not willing to take good advice when it's offered to you, and you're very belligerent in response.
You're not quoting anything because you want to pretend that I say "stop whining about actual idiotic race hatred". Note that I do call out retards when I see them (even though I also know that it's not productive, I just like making fun of retards). The question is whether it's in any way productive to go to a place where 90% of people believe X and pick fights with them in highly belligerent ways. Or, as you asked, how not to be hated.
. if i have umbrage with people or their opinions... just ignore it. but if they wish to engage in that same behavior... they can do it.
When the overwhelming majority of a place believes something stupid, then yeah, they have more leeway than someone who doesn't believe something stupid. It's not special pleading, it is reality.
i probably would've tagged you as one of the self hating non whites here. which i do believe exist on the site.
You know their inner feelings without knowing who they are? Amazing. How about you formulate a criticism that isn't a carbon copy of the insult the far-left levels at every minority who isn't obedient enough?
i do make it a point to say how come when their's anti white hate everyone says something about it. but when it's hate against jews, black people, women, gay people, alot of the users here will engage in behavior that's... well racist sexist and homophobic. without much punishment from the greater community at large.
Cause there's a lot of them. And I think they, at least the anti-Jewish ones, engage in some sort of vote manipulation.
you never disagreed with much of the racism here
No? I think I shouldn't, because it is not productive and only entertaining, but I do. And people do downvote me sometimes when I do, and so what? What exactly is your point here?
so at this point your just dumb.
Careful when calling other people dumb.
So you say going to a place where 90% of the people believe in X and i believe in Y is unproductive....
Actually read what is written. I said picking fights. A lot of people hold pretty much the same beliefs as you do on race, except the weird 'self-hating' crap, and they don't get the same extreme negative reaction, even when posting those. There is a big difference between posting views and going out and picking fights with people - even if those people are retards.
So. going by your logic... why did so many conservatives use places like: Facebook, Twitter (pre Elon) and YouTube. especially twitter and faceook. it's no secret big tech hates conservatives. so by your logic why do conservatives use sites knowing their believes are X, while the sites populace believes are Y?
The better example would be going to r/politics, where 99.9% is far-left, and posting very belligerent, bad arguments in favor of stuff they don't agree with. You're going to get a lot of hate, and not accomplish much. Now, maybe you just want entertainment. You're going to get that, but then don't wonder why you do get hate.
You can't sit there and say why do i bother being "unproductive" in a place where the majority of the users here don't agree with me. while those same people for a very very very long time. stayed on sites where they were being censored and banned from.
Cause they have nowhere else to go. Unfortunately, that is why they cluster on places that do allow free speech, and wreck them.
honestly it seems like your trying to defend them.
I'm not defending the crocodile when I tell you to not go shove a stick in its eye.
you kinda look like an asshole playing devil's advocate here.
That would not be a rare occurrence for me.
even if i was a white, straight, christian, conservative here... i'd still be the most hated person here. because people naturally don't like me.
Could that have something to do with you? All these people came to a forum created by a non-white, non-straight, non-Christian, non-conservative.
No shit sherlock. why do you think i take umbrage with it?
Kill yourself. Suck start a shotgun. Take a long walk off a short pier. Exit the twelfth floor window. Grab a cops gun. Stand on the railroad tracks. Grab a powerline. Play in traffic. Drink 10 Panera lemonades. Swim in an active volcano. Breathe vacuum. Moshpit in a industrial shredder. Wash down some oxy with vodka. Eat unknown mushrooms. Play chicken with a cement truck. End your miserable life.
In my post i simply stated the conversation surrounding the jews is next to impossible to have.
A conversation about someone who happens to be Jewish is impossible to have. It just devolves into "oy vey" and the rest of the dumb fuck script.
I've had a post written for a while, about feminism in Israel, about how the "conservative" leadership has largely failed to keep them under control.
It's an interesting topic to talk about, how ethnic nationalism is weaponized to keep them from having to actually do a good job in power.
It's similar to how the UK Conservatives lean into "boat people invasion" rhetoric while approving hundreds of thousands of permanent Ukrainian migrants. You don't have a better option, you either back the feminism going the speed limit, or the feminism going foot to the floor.
But...you can't have that conversation without someone going on the stormfag script.
And now the latest thing, you can't support Israel against terrorism without condoning everything the government does?
A conversation about someone who happens to be female is impossible to have with you, despite women being way more numerous than Jews and thus their presence in various malicious movements and organizations far more incidental.
I've had a post written for a while, about feminism in Israel, about how the "conservative" leadership has largely failed to keep them under control.
You also have posts and comments saying we have a moral obligation to support the country and its racialist ideals. Being pro-Jewish is more important to you than being pro-male or anti-feminist.
It's an interesting topic to talk about, how ethnic nationalism is weaponized to keep them from having to actually do a good job in power.
You support Jewish ethnic nationalism though.
It's similar to how the UK Conservatives lean into "boat people invasion" rhetoric while approving hundreds of thousands of permanent Ukrainian migrants. You don't have a better option, you either back the feminism going the speed limit, or the feminism going foot to the floor.
It's almost as if a bunch of White people aren't as disruptive as third-worlders.
But...you can't have that conversation without someone going on the stormfag script.
You're butthurt because you got caught red handed prioritizing ethnic nationalism (for Jews only) ahead of being pro-male or anti-feminist, and you're trying to browbeat people into no longer pointing it out.
And now the latest thing, you can't support Israel against terrorism without condoning everything the government does?
This isn't what you do. You are a full advocate of "Jews get to have an ethnostate and no one else does." We get Islamic terrorism in White countries as well as tons of interracial crime. You never #StandWithWhite people. Not only do you not do that, you will attack White women if we were try to talk about any of that.
40+ year old men are being drafted, and the women are still living it up in Europe while Olena Zelenska's hand puppet begs other countries to help them find the men that got away.
bruh, you enter a community and create "me versus you" threads full of nonsensical straw man arguments, and then you wonder why everyone here hates you.
Even if he wasn't a dog raper and an atheist his personality is odious.
In a nutshell
There is zero tolerance for christophobia around here, what did this retard expect was going to happen?
Christcucks aren't much better, but at least they engage with sincerity.
your posts are written as if addressing the community as a whole, you don't get to pick and choose when you do that.
Can you fuck off already? this place isnt the theocracy you keep trying to claim it to be . Many people here are not religious but dont care enough about the topic, to sperg about it like you do, because there are more important things to deal with.
If you want to be anti Christian and if you want to protect your precious jews, then go back to reddit and twitter which is full of jewish and jewish lovers hating on Christianity
I listened to you plenty, and even agreed with parts of what you said. Your response was to slam one of our most pleasant users based on scummy and incorrect reasoning.
I am amazed that this is somehow the most important issue. By the way, Christians are right about homosexuality. They say nothing about 'gay people', who do not exist - desiring to have relations with a given gender does not put you in a separate ontological category. They disapprove of homosexuality, and if one looks at the past few years, one can see why. It was the trojan horse for a complete collapse in gender norms.
You can say that society should not approve of homosexuality without looking down on people who do engage in that behavior, some of whom are very worthy, like David Starkey. And that is the attitude of Christians.
And perhaps you didn't. If you didn't, then I don't understand why you take such issue with Christian attitudes towards homosexuality. You say Christianity is bad, but it's not bad to be Christian. While Christians say that homosexuality is bad, but it is not bad to have such inclinations.
Religions don't do 'horrendous shit'. People do. In some cases, it's arguable whether the teachings of the religion are responsible.
No? You must not have noticed my comments about the Jews.
Maybe, but experience shows that people who are very critical of Christianity remain silent in the face of Islam, even where there are many Muslims, as in Europe - and in fact often defend Islam and Muslims.
Consider it a compliment.
What a reasonable and well-written reply.
This ought to be the last word on whatever controversy this guy is going on about.
Claiming that a black user wasn't sperging out 24/7 to earn favor with the white people here. Ignoring, of course, that the way you earn favor with white people is to sperg about non-existent racism.
It's still an action. It's not 'gay people', which is what you call people who are attracted to the same sex. Regardless, the Old Testament penal law is irrelevant for Christians. And before you make the tired old ignorant argument about shellfish, so is the ceremonial law. Only the moral law is applicable - meaning that homosexuality is considered immoral in Christianity, but there is no prescription for civil authorities on how to deal with it.
Well, that's stupid. But why are you so concerned about what a bunch of marginalized people believe? Are you trying to save their souls?
The "Christians here" aren't exactly representative of Christianity, insofar that they are Christians. There's one guy who claims to be a Christian who says that he hopes that the Jews and Arabs (a significant minority of whom are Christians) just kill each other because they are "enemies of his race". Few ideas would be more anti-Christian and modern than that.
Which rights? Who decides that these are 'rights'? Obviously, what you call gay people are not universally or even mostly pedophiles, but the concept of 'gay rights' is very modern, and I reject modernity.
You got it part right, in that I am an atheist, though not posing as a Christian. However, I do think that Christianity should be the foundation for Western civilization. I used to think that a world without religion would be more humane and rational, and then the concept of 'pregnant man' appeared.
I don't. The ones I appreciate or appreciated to some extent in the past often do critique Islam, and in fact, do so appropriately more so than Christianity. Folks like Hitchens, Dawkins and Harris (who was bearable before his TDS).
That said, this does not apply to Reddit-tier 'atheists', who are just anti-Christian. You may have the justification that you're talking to people who (you think) are mostly Christians, in mostly attacking Christianity, but they don't.
You got in someone's mind so much that he decided to create an account just to attack you.
The kind people like Ta Nehisi Coates and Nicole Hannah Jones and the rest of the three name brigade cry about. The way to success, fame and being adored by white people is to make up racism and complain about white people.
What a stupid comment. If I say that I'm bisexual, I'm obviously not "repressed" anything. In fact, you said that you don't like that you have homosexual desires, while I have no problem with it.
Fact is, you simply have no counter to what I have posted, and you try the cheap way out the same way you attempted to discredit Smith, which is really pathetic.
You're simply making up stuff.
Correct. But like I said, the problem is with the idea that a world without religion is an improvement. While you try to blame 'pregnant men' on religious leftists, this sort of nonsense - and many other things - were never taken seriously when religion was.
Not at all, but it's clearly not necessary to be barbaric to take religion seriously. You can't really compare the state of man before the industrial revolution to today, and conclude that any change must be due to changes in attitude towards religion.
I know barely anyone who is religious here in Europe.
Well, they should shut up about the Jews, insofar as it's usually completely irrelevant to any topic. That is the way you talked about it. Suddenly, there was a topic out of the blue, saying BIBLE BAD. That is not really a 'critique', that is just an attack. Now, if there is a terrorist attack and I criticize Islam as a result, yeah, that is appropriate. And frankly, it deserves to be (verbally) attacked. Why does Christianity deserve to be attacked?
Why?
Because I pointed out that the path to white people loving you is to whine about racism, like these blacks, and not point out reality, like Coleman Hughes, John McWhorter, Thomas Sowell and many other whose intellect is vastly greater than the clowns worshiped by whites?
Yeah, I do think that what is happening right now is a vastly greater evil than homosexuals being in the closet. Civilization has survived the latter. Can we survive the former? Perhaps you will argue that it is 'unfair'. But there is no rule that life has to be fair. People are born with all sorts of things that screws them over in life.
Neither is true. I don't have a problem with "gay people" (I don't think this should be an identity), nor with people who practice homosexuality. I have a problem with how the acceptance of homosexuality has opened the floodgates, or at least has coincided with, the opening of the floodgates of degeneracy.
Then you would expect homosexuals to become more normal as their practices are more accepted. Maybe it is too soon to tell, but it certainly does not seem that way to me. With acceptance now taken for granted, it seems to be going the other way, and pushing the envelope with degeneracy like transgenderism, grooming and perversion.
You apologized to him only to accuse him now of 'sucking enough white dicks'? See, this is why no one likes you, and everyone likes him. Because you are obnoxious as hell if taken seriously, and he is quite possibly the most pleasant fellow here.
That was not your claim. You claimed I see it as an illness, or something like that. You have nothing with which to back it up.
As for it being bad, I think it is bad on a societal level, not on an individual level. On an individual level, I only despise the activists.
You don't say, when people did not know what the hell was going on, they made up explanations that made no sense. If you're going to blame religion for this, you should blame medicine for bloodletting - as humors was the leading medical theory until recently.
You said all crazy that to come to this eminently reasonable conclusion? C'mon. At least say religion is much worse than Nazism. With your statement I agree.
I agree. But why are we moving towards 'pregnant men' as religion is being lost? Like with what you call 'being gay', this is not bad on the individual level (as an atheist may be more reasonable than a believer, like I am), but on a social level - it seems that if you don't believe in religion, you will fall for anything. Certainly, our descent into madness as religion is lost does not suggest that loss of religion is doing a great amount of good.
Depends on how you define mental illness. But it is a strange way for religious people to deal with a sin.
Done. Religion isn't perfect. Now admit that we've gone to absolute hell since religion started declining.
Why was it.
I never claimed that. Why do you keep making stuff up?
Doesn't even work, but yeah, as for the people I know, almost no one is religious. You didn't think I was claiming to know the entire population, right?
Wait, so let me get this straight. If people here liked the works of Shakespeare, and said 'dumb shit', you would be criticizing Shakespeare? What a weird way to go about things.
It's just stuff you disagree with. It is not "dumb shit". I'm also pro-abortion, but I don't think people are dumb if they disagree with me as you do in your arrogance.
Well, you do. If you oppose so called 'racism', then that is a residue of Christian values. There is no Jew or Greek in Christ, after all, and Jesus is said to have commanded to make disciples of all the nations of the world.
They're not 'ruining your life', or having any effect on your life.
Well, yeah. You think I mind downvotes?
If I'm the 'asshole' either on this forum or in this conversation, there is something seriously wrong with you. And if you take pride in being blocked, then you understand my argument that it's a mark of pride in having someone get so mad to create fake accounts - as they've also done for me.
Once again, your issue is you obsess and spin out. You care what other people think, you make assumptions about people's opinions of you, and you're so fragile you can't handle the idea that even one person might not like you or, not might not have correctly understood you. I know other people like you. I get that you feel misunderstood.
But, again, it's not that you're an atheist. We have atheists here, as mentioned. You keep trying to stir up trouble, you lash you, you spam, you insult. People don't care about your opinions, they dislike your attitude and behavior.
And even the people who are nice to you, and try to help you, you lash out and insult and bully. You also tell everyone else what to do; 'leave,' 'ignore me (while I spam the shit out of everything and badmouth you),' 'die, asshole,' etc. You're unpleasant to everyone, because you are delusional about who everyone is. It's very unpleasant. There are plenty of people here who hate you, yes. There are also plenty of people who genuinely wish you the best. And you shit on everyone equally. Work on yourself, stop trying to control everyone else. Stop obsessing.
That is his biggest problem, and the biggest problem of a lot of people.
Though after seeing Jordan Peterson's latest podcast with the 'would be school shooter', I wonder if there is anyone who doesn't. This is a guy who was treated like dirt by literally everyone. It's easy for people who have the respect of their family, friends, employer, etc. to say that they don't care about what others think, but that's because everyone worth caring about does respect you.
While I also dislike his bad attitude, I don't think he's as bad as people make him out to be. He's spoken out against 'anti-white' BS, and it's not as if people come here pretending to be right-wing in order to fool people into buying other bad opinions (though people have accused me of that as well). That said, I also don't think his bad attitude can be fixed.
This is not exactly the place to learn to be a good or better person. But if you do want to be, you should apologize to Smith, and learn from him how to be a pleasant person.
It's also close to impossible to avoid hate. You think I'm some sort of crypto white supremacist or something, or at least a colored trying to curry favor with Stormfags. And yet they do hate me a lot. The way to not have an issue with being hated is to not care when people do hate you, particularly when it is not exactly the cream of humanity.
Musonius Rufus said it best, when he told a slave that instead of demanding that his master not beat him, he should learn to endure the beatings - because unlike the beatings, those are in his control. Obviously, this is extreme, but there's a lesson in that. You can't control whether other people hate you. But you can control your own reaction to it. Some people are more naturally immune to it, but don't you think that if you let pixels on a screen upset you in any way, you're giving people what they want?
In general, soapbox topics of "here's why you're wrong" aren't going to be well-received anywhere. So you should take hatred for granted if you're going to post stuff like that. Right or wrong.
At first, I was impressed, and then I read those three last pathetic paragraphs. First of all, you knew at the time that I'm not white, because I had just told you. Secondly, there are plenty of people here who are not racist, and who don't have people downvoting them all the time - e.g. Impossible (when not being retarded), Kienan, Gizortzik, me.
The semi-last paragraph makes ZERO sense. So of all the people here, some of whom say "the holocaust did not happen but it should have", you think you should have tagged one of the people who has never said anything racist, hateful or even unkind and called him a racist? Sorry, you are certifiably retarded. If you have more of a problem with one of our black users than the people who call black women 'sheboons', maybe the problem is you.
See, you're simply not willing to take good advice when it's offered to you, and you're very belligerent in response.
You're not quoting anything because you want to pretend that I say "stop whining about actual idiotic race hatred". Note that I do call out retards when I see them (even though I also know that it's not productive, I just like making fun of retards). The question is whether it's in any way productive to go to a place where 90% of people believe X and pick fights with them in highly belligerent ways. Or, as you asked, how not to be hated.
When the overwhelming majority of a place believes something stupid, then yeah, they have more leeway than someone who doesn't believe something stupid. It's not special pleading, it is reality.
You know their inner feelings without knowing who they are? Amazing. How about you formulate a criticism that isn't a carbon copy of the insult the far-left levels at every minority who isn't obedient enough?
Cause there's a lot of them. And I think they, at least the anti-Jewish ones, engage in some sort of vote manipulation.
No? I think I shouldn't, because it is not productive and only entertaining, but I do. And people do downvote me sometimes when I do, and so what? What exactly is your point here?
Careful when calling other people dumb.
Actually read what is written. I said picking fights. A lot of people hold pretty much the same beliefs as you do on race, except the weird 'self-hating' crap, and they don't get the same extreme negative reaction, even when posting those. There is a big difference between posting views and going out and picking fights with people - even if those people are retards.
The better example would be going to r/politics, where 99.9% is far-left, and posting very belligerent, bad arguments in favor of stuff they don't agree with. You're going to get a lot of hate, and not accomplish much. Now, maybe you just want entertainment. You're going to get that, but then don't wonder why you do get hate.
Cause they have nowhere else to go. Unfortunately, that is why they cluster on places that do allow free speech, and wreck them.
I'm not defending the crocodile when I tell you to not go shove a stick in its eye.
That would not be a rare occurrence for me.
Could that have something to do with you? All these people came to a forum created by a non-white, non-straight, non-Christian, non-conservative.
So you're just railing against the clouds?
Drink bleach, asshole.
Kill yourself. Suck start a shotgun. Take a long walk off a short pier. Exit the twelfth floor window. Grab a cops gun. Stand on the railroad tracks. Grab a powerline. Play in traffic. Drink 10 Panera lemonades. Swim in an active volcano. Breathe vacuum. Moshpit in a industrial shredder. Wash down some oxy with vodka. Eat unknown mushrooms. Play chicken with a cement truck. End your miserable life.
Come on! Why hold back? Tell him what you really think of him!
He's probably already gonna get whacked by the kid toucher running the place.
kvetch
Can I be honest? I actually really want to like you bluestorm. But this is not it bruh
Remember, just as one Christian being an ass doesn't mean all Christians are asses, not all atheists are like this person.
I'm not...
I'm not surprised. Listening to others is not a strong suit of yours.
It's not "my" holy book.
The reason you get push back is because you act like an arsehole every time you are here.
Which is fine, by the way. If you want to act like an arsehole, go right ahead.
But don't expect people to ignore the fact that you're acting like an arsehole.
See, the issue is that because you're a bigot, you assume everybody here is just that and proceed accordingly.
Would you like it if everybody here assumed you were a paedophile in each and every interaction?
A conversation about someone who happens to be Jewish is impossible to have. It just devolves into "oy vey" and the rest of the dumb fuck script.
I've had a post written for a while, about feminism in Israel, about how the "conservative" leadership has largely failed to keep them under control.
It's an interesting topic to talk about, how ethnic nationalism is weaponized to keep them from having to actually do a good job in power.
It's similar to how the UK Conservatives lean into "boat people invasion" rhetoric while approving hundreds of thousands of permanent Ukrainian migrants. You don't have a better option, you either back the feminism going the speed limit, or the feminism going foot to the floor.
But...you can't have that conversation without someone going on the stormfag script.
And now the latest thing, you can't support Israel against terrorism without condoning everything the government does?
A conversation about someone who happens to be female is impossible to have with you, despite women being way more numerous than Jews and thus their presence in various malicious movements and organizations far more incidental.
You also have posts and comments saying we have a moral obligation to support the country and its racialist ideals. Being pro-Jewish is more important to you than being pro-male or anti-feminist.
You support Jewish ethnic nationalism though.
It's almost as if a bunch of White people aren't as disruptive as third-worlders.
You're butthurt because you got caught red handed prioritizing ethnic nationalism (for Jews only) ahead of being pro-male or anti-feminist, and you're trying to browbeat people into no longer pointing it out.
This isn't what you do. You are a full advocate of "Jews get to have an ethnostate and no one else does." We get Islamic terrorism in White countries as well as tons of interracial crime. You never #StandWithWhite people. Not only do you not do that, you will attack White women if we were try to talk about any of that.
Not to mention that Ukraine is in an actual conflict, so the flimsy pretense of "asylum seekers" is at least plausible in their case.
It's not plausible. They should be drafted.
40+ year old men are being drafted, and the women are still living it up in Europe while Olena Zelenska's hand puppet begs other countries to help them find the men that got away.