Correct. The Synod interprets The Science to the masses. The Science is never wrong. If you think there is something wrong with The Science, that is a sign there is something wrong with you. You need even more The Science until you repent your evil thoughts.
They have been brainwashed to hate anything that goes against the commie agenda, and to love anything that supports the commie agenda.
Gay commies don't communicate to exchange ideas like normal people. They communicate to virtue signal their support for the revolution, to provoke the enemies of the revolution into outing themselves, and to prove their loyalty by attacking those outed enemies.
I'm old enough to remember when it was conventional wisdom to treat major multinational pharmaceutical companies with suspicion of only being in it for profit. That used to be day 1 level operandi
For the unelected masses who vote Democrat, it's so they can claim yet another avenue of moral dominance over centrists and right wingers. NPCs are addicted to the dopamine hit of righteous fury they get from championing their ideology. It's an emotional experience, not an objective one.
If the vast majority of immigrants crossing the southern border were whites who voted Republican upon citizenship (see, e.g., Cubans), would democrats support unlimited illegal immigration? Would Republicans?
If the vast majority of doctors, professors, etc., said publicly--without fear of cancelation and harassment--that women are women, men are men, and transgenderism is a disorder, would leftists still believe the science?
Because their trust isn't based in logic or empiricism, it's entirely a dogmatic reaction to the idea that they might be associated with those icky, backwards conservatives.
They don't care about or even really perceive science, or the scientific community, as they actually are. They like the idea of science. Actually that's not even fully accurate, it's more like adopt "liking science" as a personal brand because it makes them feel smugly enlightened to do so.
Damn right. Those boys are fighting the good fight! If it weren't for Israel we would have no allies on the far other side of the world that gets us entangled into wars! You fucking libtards can't understand how important sending more money to israel for their border wall is. And no I'm not racist! My grandson is half black and I'm proud to give him my property so he can sell it for drugs and promote his SoundCloud rap career.
During Covid it was always a woman (driven mainly by her hatred of Trump) inventing rules like “stay 6 feet apart”, “wear a mask”, “vaccine is better than prior infection”
I learned for the first time that peer reviewers often never saw the underlying data. It was just an opportunity to check for wrongthink. “Trust us - because I have a lab coat”
Because it is a religion.
And scientist is one of the priestly titles, rather than anything to do with truth or rigor.
Correct. The Synod interprets The Science to the masses. The Science is never wrong. If you think there is something wrong with The Science, that is a sign there is something wrong with you. You need even more The Science until you repent your evil thoughts.
Science has gone from a testable process to some sort of abstract guidance from the Oracles. I mean "experts".
Academia is infested with Progressives, aka Rainbow-Marxists.
They have been brainwashed to hate anything that goes against the commie agenda, and to love anything that supports the commie agenda.
Gay commies don't communicate to exchange ideas like normal people. They communicate to virtue signal their support for the revolution, to provoke the enemies of the revolution into outing themselves, and to prove their loyalty by attacking those outed enemies.
What they are talking about is irrelevant.
Add in nonsensical things like transgender and “non-binary”
What is a woman?
I'm old enough to remember when it was conventional wisdom to treat major multinational pharmaceutical companies with suspicion of only being in it for profit. That used to be day 1 level operandi
For the elected Democrats, becau$e.
For the unelected masses who vote Democrat, it's so they can claim yet another avenue of moral dominance over centrists and right wingers. NPCs are addicted to the dopamine hit of righteous fury they get from championing their ideology. It's an emotional experience, not an objective one.
Thought experiment.
If the vast majority of immigrants crossing the southern border were whites who voted Republican upon citizenship (see, e.g., Cubans), would democrats support unlimited illegal immigration? Would Republicans?
If the vast majority of doctors, professors, etc., said publicly--without fear of cancelation and harassment--that women are women, men are men, and transgenderism is a disorder, would leftists still believe the science?
No.
Because their trust isn't based in logic or empiricism, it's entirely a dogmatic reaction to the idea that they might be associated with those icky, backwards conservatives.
They don't care about or even really perceive science, or the scientific community, as they actually are. They like the idea of science. Actually that's not even fully accurate, it's more like adopt "liking science" as a personal brand because it makes them feel smugly enlightened to do so.
TL;DR the truth don't matter, feelz over realz.
It's much easier to fool someone than it is to convince them that they've been fooled.
Boomer Rs do too
Dems, as of late, also love themselves some Lockheed Martin
Damn right. Those boys are fighting the good fight! If it weren't for Israel we would have no allies on the far other side of the world that gets us entangled into wars! You fucking libtards can't understand how important sending more money to israel for their border wall is. And no I'm not racist! My grandson is half black and I'm proud to give him my property so he can sell it for drugs and promote his SoundCloud rap career.
Scientistry is an accurate description.
During Covid it was always a woman (driven mainly by her hatred of Trump) inventing rules like “stay 6 feet apart”, “wear a mask”, “vaccine is better than prior infection”
I learned for the first time that peer reviewers often never saw the underlying data. It was just an opportunity to check for wrongthink. “Trust us - because I have a lab coat”