I'm absolutely amazed that it's taken this long for journalists to do this kind of shit. even James O'Keefe with project veritas didn't post the raw unedited footage of his interviews publicly.
We also learned this from the early gamergate days. Someone or some people were interviewed by a mainstream journalist who then edited it deceptively into a larger program. The details escape me but I want to say it was the BBC and maybe Sargon.
grossly overweight
He's only 230lbs, iirc, which isn't so abnormal anymore.
James O'Keefe had mastered the art of releasing damning evidence, but not all of it at once, so the fucktards he caught would lie about something he has back-up evidence for.
Then they would try to lie their way again into an ''evidence gap'', only to get smacked again because he had evidence against their new lies too.
Originally, what interviewers did was get the person they are interviewing to sign a release that gives the interviewer sole ownership for the interview. Since the MSM is information out ASAP, they are forgetting that part and just releasing the information and chopping it up before the other person can release their story.
For all the talk of protecting sources in the 'Mug Club Investigates,' pitch, here's Crowder revealing information about his source to a Urinalist the next day. I guess the opening for the livestream the day prior was just a skit/LARP?
I can't watch it right this minute. Did he actually say that? I heard about someone getting fired over the leak, I have to guess it's related to Crowder letting this slip?
He did reveal that his second "source" was a detective who verified the information the first source had was authentic.
As posted elsewhere here, Candace Owens has now come out and claims that two detectives are being fired over this. She has underhanded reasons to potentially ascribe her next claim -- that one of the officers took money for it -- but that's a possible thing too, with this release.
Honestly, if everything gets released and is authentic, I don't really give a fuck if someone had to pay the cop to get it. After all, it's been suppressed because of corruption and false motives, so it's all fair play as far as I'm concerned.
It's pretty glorious to watch his (Jeremy Finley) twatter feed blow up. You could tell the first few are "and everyone clapped" coworkers and sycophants. But then the blowtorch is activated. I expect he's going to retreat to "protected" status any minute now.
I don’t post here often. It’s become 💯 a feed of the court of public opinion. Today, I was called a coward and a shit reporter for waiting to verify before a well-placed source confirmed details. I’m just jumping in to say that’s how journos work. 👋🏻
I'm absolutely amazed that it's taken this long for journalists to do this kind of shit. even James O'Keefe with project veritas didn't post the raw unedited footage of his interviews publicly.
Everyone needs to do this when interacting with "journalists" these days lest they spin you as the villain to fit their narrative.
Lol, 'these days'?
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=SqDP8SnPVA0&pp=ygUUU2ltcHNvbnMgcm9jayBib3R0b20%3D
Best part.
Also, shows more integrity than most journalists we already have.
Hah.
We also learned this from the early gamergate days. Someone or some people were interviewed by a mainstream journalist who then edited it deceptively into a larger program. The details escape me but I want to say it was the BBC and maybe Sargon.
He's only 230lbs, iirc, which isn't so abnormal anymore.
https://redirect.invidious.io/watch?v=SqDP8SnPVA0
James O'Keefe had mastered the art of releasing damning evidence, but not all of it at once, so the fucktards he caught would lie about something he has back-up evidence for.
Then they would try to lie their way again into an ''evidence gap'', only to get smacked again because he had evidence against their new lies too.
Originally, what interviewers did was get the person they are interviewing to sign a release that gives the interviewer sole ownership for the interview. Since the MSM is information out ASAP, they are forgetting that part and just releasing the information and chopping it up before the other person can release their story.
I can't believe Crowder gave up that one of his sources was a detective involved.
Genuinely seems like an unforced error.
For all the talk of protecting sources in the 'Mug Club Investigates,' pitch, here's Crowder revealing information about his source to a Urinalist the next day. I guess the opening for the livestream the day prior was just a skit/LARP?
Two detectives are already set to be fired, so maybe it didn't matter to them anymore.
https://communities.win/c/KotakuInAction2/p/17rlrHwA8w/how-convenient-suddenly-dw-can-g/c
It might matter to them when they get suicided.
I can't watch it right this minute. Did he actually say that? I heard about someone getting fired over the leak, I have to guess it's related to Crowder letting this slip?
He did reveal that his second "source" was a detective who verified the information the first source had was authentic.
As posted elsewhere here, Candace Owens has now come out and claims that two detectives are being fired over this. She has underhanded reasons to potentially ascribe her next claim -- that one of the officers took money for it -- but that's a possible thing too, with this release.
Honestly, if everything gets released and is authentic, I don't really give a fuck if someone had to pay the cop to get it. After all, it's been suppressed because of corruption and false motives, so it's all fair play as far as I'm concerned.
Counterpoint: There can be more than one detective and that detective isn't the one and only spurce he is talking about.
Edit: I posted that, scrolled down, and sawthis: https://communities.win/c/KotakuInAction2/p/17rlrHwA8w/how-convenient-suddenly-dw-can-g/c
Or that's what he wants you to think.
never talk to the media
It's pretty glorious to watch his (Jeremy Finley) twatter feed blow up. You could tell the first few are "and everyone clapped" coworkers and sycophants. But then the blowtorch is activated. I expect he's going to retreat to "protected" status any minute now.
What are you talking about? The guy interviewing crowder? What was the narrative he's pushing ？
"you be the judge" .. how were they trying to paint this interview?
That's what the faggot reporter posted on X
Literally what online forums and social media is supposed to be.
Yeah him posting that as if it's a bad thing is just another reminder of how out of touch these jackasses are.
That journo is straight up NPC. Entire time just listening for the “gotcha”.
It’s frightening as fuck.
And you should publish it either at the same time as their story or just before it releases.