The worst thing you can do to an online leftist is deviate 1% from their orthodoxy. Nobody is full of more hate than an online leftist has for somebody they perceive to be an ex-leftist.
If you go back WAY in the archives the author of Sinfest used to have a pretty hard leftist tilt. Something happened in the last few years and now things have come around.
Reddit HATES when people have a come to Jesus moment.
I’m curious to know what red pilled him too. Though OP is right about his opposition to Israel. I’d think the left would cut him a little slack. But stray from the plantation too far or too long and there is no forgetting or forgiving I suppose.
Sinfest was libertarian-left for a while, but then went HARD in on "leftist" SJW left for a good while. Pulling back away from them, well, as they like to crow, "sometimes losing your privilege feels a lot like being attacked".
But he courted that audience, cultivated it, for quite a while. So it isn't unexpected that they're lying around there in particular. I feel bad for him, but it is, strictly speaking, his own fault for going full SJW. He should probably just discontinue the comic, and start a new one, a clean slate, if he wishes to shed those dregs hanging off him.
Like if they dont like it why do they hang around still?
The existence of anything that isn't under their control is like the constant pain of a splinter to them. Their goal is to subvert or destroy EVERYTHING until nothing except their worldview exists. They believe that a gay commie star trek utopia magically springs into being once they kill all of the chuds.
Lynching dissenters is how they shore up their own cognitive dissonance. They have too many nagging doubts about their ideology so they react to dissent with violence as a means to justify themselves.
It's very much like how some of the loudest homophobes do it to suppress their own homosexual desires.
There's different types of reaction to fags. There's the typical disgust. Mild and unpleasant, enough to steer normies away from fags. Then there's the wild and obnoxious "I want to punch every faggot ever" which is often performative overcompensating.
You are correct. I will also say that I might suspect someone who is really intent on proving that he is not a homosexual. However, none of that has anything to do with people who object to homosexual behavior on moral or other grounds.
I got distracted with this whole non-sequitur. What I was trying to stay is that there is a loud minority of communists that are obnoxiously anti-nazi to the point where they think even giving a nazi a chance to speech makes everyone in the room guilty by association. Deep down, they know the nazis are right and these commies have to keep telling themselves that the nazis are evil so they don't acknowledge what are obvious facts.
It gets really annoying when these rabid anti-nazis hear familiar arguments from people that have no connection with nazis and fly into their rage. Because the facts speak for themselves and people can discover them independently.
I'd say it has some evidence. There's been a number of religious people here in the US who railed against the gays, and then turns out they were banging dudes the whole time.
That proves nothing though. There's also a great number of people who wholly support homosexuality, and then it turns out they were banging dudes the whole time.
The only one less likely than AntonioOfVenice to not know that quote is someone with the username GertrudeOfElsinore.
But still, I wouldn't confuse a quote from one character with actual empirical proof. Besides, what that quote is about is remarrying, which the character here referred to steadfastly denied that she would ever do, which offended someone who actually did that. Covering her own ass.
Let's say though that the quote is accurate. The proper analogy would be that someone who is always saying that "I AM NOT A HOMO" is more likely to be a homosexual, not someone who expresses moral opposition to homosexuality.
The gay commie campaign to demonize "hypocrisy" is one of the many methods they are using to dissolve civilization. Hypocrisy and an intentionally curated "public face" is how people of different values can harmoniously live and work together through an implicitly agreed upon shared suspension of disbelief.
There's different types of reaction to fags. There's the typical disgust, which you note. Mild and unpleasant, enough to steer normies away from fags. Then there's the wild and obnoxious "I want to punch every faggot ever" which is often performative overcompensating.
A lot of communists demonstrate this kind of performative over-compensation, which I find curious.
I don't want to punch faggots, I want them to stop talking about being faggots.
There have always been faggots with us but there was a reasonable compromise 50-60 years ago. Normal people knew they were faggots, they knew normal people knew they were faggots. But it was considered rude for normal people to publicly bring up their faggotry and it was a social or, in excessive cases, a legal offense for them to be public and "proud" about it.
They kept to their designated areas, normal people got to live their lives making little mental and no physical effort to avoid faggotry. And KIDS could make it to adulthood never having to know it existed as a "lifestyle", only as something vaguely bad that they used to make fun of each other.
You seem to be trying really hard to defend your particular style of anti-homosexuality. Do you have something to tell us? 😏 Seriously though, people can have the same goals but with different motives. I'm not trying to paint everyone with the same brush.
What I wanted to get at is that there is a loud minority of communists that are obnoxiously anti-nazi to the point where they think even giving a nazi a chance to speech makes everyone in the room guilty by association. Almost like they know the nazis are right and these commies have to keep telling themselves that the nazis are evil so they don't succumb to what are obvious facts.
It gets really annoying when these rabid anti-nazis hear familiar arguments from people that have no connection with nazis and fly into their rage. Because the facts speak for themselves and people can discover them independently.
He was a rabid leftist, so the subreddit would have been given to, and run by, rabid leftists.
This isn't a takeover situation unlike the 99 other times this happens, it's that he's seen the light, it's just his old home is still infested with the demons he summoned.
Sounds just like the Stonetoss hate club. Faggots with nothing better to do than stalk someone doing something productive and call him names. Not call him wrong, just demoralize him.
The sinfest guy is really long winded. But he's productive, got to give him that.
I mean, that is the problem when you court a specific psychotic political audience for years, then try to schism off against them later.
Like, Sinfest brought this on itself. It wanted to be the Radical Feminist fun time, and now the golem Radical Feminist created, trannies, won't let him abandon it.
It's Reddit.
You're not "nobody" - you're a dissenter.
And people like this can only be happy once every last bit of dissent has been stamped out.
The worst thing you can do to an online leftist is deviate 1% from their orthodoxy. Nobody is full of more hate than an online leftist has for somebody they perceive to be an ex-leftist.
they loved him until he dissented
If you go back WAY in the archives the author of Sinfest used to have a pretty hard leftist tilt. Something happened in the last few years and now things have come around.
Reddit HATES when people have a come to Jesus moment.
I’m curious to know what red pilled him too. Though OP is right about his opposition to Israel. I’d think the left would cut him a little slack. But stray from the plantation too far or too long and there is no forgetting or forgiving I suppose.
Pretty sure it was trannies. I think he made a lot of comics making fun of trannies in Women’s sports and stuff.
Sinfest was libertarian-left for a while, but then went HARD in on "leftist" SJW left for a good while. Pulling back away from them, well, as they like to crow, "sometimes losing your privilege feels a lot like being attacked".
But he courted that audience, cultivated it, for quite a while. So it isn't unexpected that they're lying around there in particular. I feel bad for him, but it is, strictly speaking, his own fault for going full SJW. He should probably just discontinue the comic, and start a new one, a clean slate, if he wishes to shed those dregs hanging off him.
If Pikamine/Henya situation has tought me anything is that there's no such thing as starting fresh for these freaks.
Because eventually he will either concede or quit.
They do the same thing with everything; hang around and complain until the thing is cancelled or changed.
Very few things survive their incessant nagging.
You're talking about people who spend 18 hours a day thinking about Donald Trump, and will do so until the day he dies.
The existence of anything that isn't under their control is like the constant pain of a splinter to them. Their goal is to subvert or destroy EVERYTHING until nothing except their worldview exists. They believe that a gay commie star trek utopia magically springs into being once they kill all of the chuds.
Lynching dissenters is how they shore up their own cognitive dissonance. They have too many nagging doubts about their ideology so they react to dissent with violence as a means to justify themselves.
It's very much like how some of the loudest homophobes do it to suppress their own homosexual desires.
That is BS, made up in order to try to attempt to delegitimize opposition to homosexual behavior.
Oh, you're against pedos? HAR HAR, you must be a pedo yourself!
There's different types of reaction to fags. There's the typical disgust. Mild and unpleasant, enough to steer normies away from fags. Then there's the wild and obnoxious "I want to punch every faggot ever" which is often performative overcompensating.
You are correct. I will also say that I might suspect someone who is really intent on proving that he is not a homosexual. However, none of that has anything to do with people who object to homosexual behavior on moral or other grounds.
I got distracted with this whole non-sequitur. What I was trying to stay is that there is a loud minority of communists that are obnoxiously anti-nazi to the point where they think even giving a nazi a chance to speech makes everyone in the room guilty by association. Deep down, they know the nazis are right and these commies have to keep telling themselves that the nazis are evil so they don't acknowledge what are obvious facts.
It gets really annoying when these rabid anti-nazis hear familiar arguments from people that have no connection with nazis and fly into their rage. Because the facts speak for themselves and people can discover them independently.
What do you mean? I don't think they think or 'know' that at all. However, they do act a lot like Nazis.
I mean, it is partially true. Just because the SJW types have abused it doesnt mean there isnt some historical precedent to it
I'd say it has some evidence. There's been a number of religious people here in the US who railed against the gays, and then turns out they were banging dudes the whole time.
That proves nothing though. There's also a great number of people who wholly support homosexuality, and then it turns out they were banging dudes the whole time.
You never heard of "The lady doth protest too much, methinks" did you?
The only one less likely than AntonioOfVenice to not know that quote is someone with the username GertrudeOfElsinore.
But still, I wouldn't confuse a quote from one character with actual empirical proof. Besides, what that quote is about is remarrying, which the character here referred to steadfastly denied that she would ever do, which offended someone who actually did that. Covering her own ass.
Let's say though that the quote is accurate. The proper analogy would be that someone who is always saying that "I AM NOT A HOMO" is more likely to be a homosexual, not someone who expresses moral opposition to homosexuality.
This is gay commie propaganda.
First the word "homophobe" is an attempt to turn the natural disgust reflex normal people have with faggots into something to be ashamed of. Second having the correct ideals but failing to live up to them doesn't invalidate the ideals.
The gay commie campaign to demonize "hypocrisy" is one of the many methods they are using to dissolve civilization. Hypocrisy and an intentionally curated "public face" is how people of different values can harmoniously live and work together through an implicitly agreed upon shared suspension of disbelief.
There's different types of reaction to fags. There's the typical disgust, which you note. Mild and unpleasant, enough to steer normies away from fags. Then there's the wild and obnoxious "I want to punch every faggot ever" which is often performative overcompensating.
A lot of communists demonstrate this kind of performative over-compensation, which I find curious.
I don't want to punch faggots, I want them to stop talking about being faggots.
There have always been faggots with us but there was a reasonable compromise 50-60 years ago. Normal people knew they were faggots, they knew normal people knew they were faggots. But it was considered rude for normal people to publicly bring up their faggotry and it was a social or, in excessive cases, a legal offense for them to be public and "proud" about it.
They kept to their designated areas, normal people got to live their lives making little mental and no physical effort to avoid faggotry. And KIDS could make it to adulthood never having to know it existed as a "lifestyle", only as something vaguely bad that they used to make fun of each other.
You seem to be trying really hard to defend your particular style of anti-homosexuality. Do you have something to tell us? 😏 Seriously though, people can have the same goals but with different motives. I'm not trying to paint everyone with the same brush.
What I wanted to get at is that there is a loud minority of communists that are obnoxiously anti-nazi to the point where they think even giving a nazi a chance to speech makes everyone in the room guilty by association. Almost like they know the nazis are right and these commies have to keep telling themselves that the nazis are evil so they don't succumb to what are obvious facts.
It gets really annoying when these rabid anti-nazis hear familiar arguments from people that have no connection with nazis and fly into their rage. Because the facts speak for themselves and people can discover them independently.
Did you know that without something to hate, predditors and twattards will DIE in REAL LIFE?
Now you know!
if only
This makes sense.
He was a rabid leftist, so the subreddit would have been given to, and run by, rabid leftists.
This isn't a takeover situation unlike the 99 other times this happens, it's that he's seen the light, it's just his old home is still infested with the demons he summoned.
Sounds just like the Stonetoss hate club. Faggots with nothing better to do than stalk someone doing something productive and call him names. Not call him wrong, just demoralize him.
The sinfest guy is really long winded. But he's productive, got to give him that.
I mean, that is the problem when you court a specific psychotic political audience for years, then try to schism off against them later.
Like, Sinfest brought this on itself. It wanted to be the Radical Feminist fun time, and now the golem Radical Feminist created, trannies, won't let him abandon it.
Sinfest:
https://imgur.com/a/EWaRjSj
They also go on Truth knowing they deplatformed them because they hate him.
the real question is, why are you still on reddit?
The best compliment any political activist can have is to have his opponents be obsessed with him.
Sinfest? What comics have they done? It seems with any subreddit it will be infiltrated