Lynching dissenters is how they shore up their own cognitive dissonance. They have too many nagging doubts about their ideology so they react to dissent with violence as a means to justify themselves.
It's very much like how some of the loudest homophobes do it to suppress their own homosexual desires.
There's different types of reaction to fags. There's the typical disgust. Mild and unpleasant, enough to steer normies away from fags. Then there's the wild and obnoxious "I want to punch every faggot ever" which is often performative overcompensating.
You are correct. I will also say that I might suspect someone who is really intent on proving that he is not a homosexual. However, none of that has anything to do with people who object to homosexual behavior on moral or other grounds.
I got distracted with this whole non-sequitur. What I was trying to stay is that there is a loud minority of communists that are obnoxiously anti-nazi to the point where they think even giving a nazi a chance to speech makes everyone in the room guilty by association. Deep down, they know the nazis are right and these commies have to keep telling themselves that the nazis are evil so they don't acknowledge what are obvious facts.
It gets really annoying when these rabid anti-nazis hear familiar arguments from people that have no connection with nazis and fly into their rage. Because the facts speak for themselves and people can discover them independently.
I'd say it has some evidence. There's been a number of religious people here in the US who railed against the gays, and then turns out they were banging dudes the whole time.
That proves nothing though. There's also a great number of people who wholly support homosexuality, and then it turns out they were banging dudes the whole time.
The only one less likely than AntonioOfVenice to not know that quote is someone with the username GertrudeOfElsinore.
But still, I wouldn't confuse a quote from one character with actual empirical proof. Besides, what that quote is about is remarrying, which the character here referred to steadfastly denied that she would ever do, which offended someone who actually did that. Covering her own ass.
Let's say though that the quote is accurate. The proper analogy would be that someone who is always saying that "I AM NOT A HOMO" is more likely to be a homosexual, not someone who expresses moral opposition to homosexuality.
The gay commie campaign to demonize "hypocrisy" is one of the many methods they are using to dissolve civilization. Hypocrisy and an intentionally curated "public face" is how people of different values can harmoniously live and work together through an implicitly agreed upon shared suspension of disbelief.
There's different types of reaction to fags. There's the typical disgust, which you note. Mild and unpleasant, enough to steer normies away from fags. Then there's the wild and obnoxious "I want to punch every faggot ever" which is often performative overcompensating.
A lot of communists demonstrate this kind of performative over-compensation, which I find curious.
I don't want to punch faggots, I want them to stop talking about being faggots.
There have always been faggots with us but there was a reasonable compromise 50-60 years ago. Normal people knew they were faggots, they knew normal people knew they were faggots. But it was considered rude for normal people to publicly bring up their faggotry and it was a social or, in excessive cases, a legal offense for them to be public and "proud" about it.
They kept to their designated areas, normal people got to live their lives making little mental and no physical effort to avoid faggotry. And KIDS could make it to adulthood never having to know it existed as a "lifestyle", only as something vaguely bad that they used to make fun of each other.
You seem to be trying really hard to defend your particular style of anti-homosexuality. Do you have something to tell us? 😏 Seriously though, people can have the same goals but with different motives. I'm not trying to paint everyone with the same brush.
What I wanted to get at is that there is a loud minority of communists that are obnoxiously anti-nazi to the point where they think even giving a nazi a chance to speech makes everyone in the room guilty by association. Almost like they know the nazis are right and these commies have to keep telling themselves that the nazis are evil so they don't succumb to what are obvious facts.
It gets really annoying when these rabid anti-nazis hear familiar arguments from people that have no connection with nazis and fly into their rage. Because the facts speak for themselves and people can discover them independently.
Lynching dissenters is how they shore up their own cognitive dissonance. They have too many nagging doubts about their ideology so they react to dissent with violence as a means to justify themselves.
It's very much like how some of the loudest homophobes do it to suppress their own homosexual desires.
That is BS, made up in order to try to attempt to delegitimize opposition to homosexual behavior.
Oh, you're against pedos? HAR HAR, you must be a pedo yourself!
There's different types of reaction to fags. There's the typical disgust. Mild and unpleasant, enough to steer normies away from fags. Then there's the wild and obnoxious "I want to punch every faggot ever" which is often performative overcompensating.
You are correct. I will also say that I might suspect someone who is really intent on proving that he is not a homosexual. However, none of that has anything to do with people who object to homosexual behavior on moral or other grounds.
I got distracted with this whole non-sequitur. What I was trying to stay is that there is a loud minority of communists that are obnoxiously anti-nazi to the point where they think even giving a nazi a chance to speech makes everyone in the room guilty by association. Deep down, they know the nazis are right and these commies have to keep telling themselves that the nazis are evil so they don't acknowledge what are obvious facts.
It gets really annoying when these rabid anti-nazis hear familiar arguments from people that have no connection with nazis and fly into their rage. Because the facts speak for themselves and people can discover them independently.
I'd say it has some evidence. There's been a number of religious people here in the US who railed against the gays, and then turns out they were banging dudes the whole time.
That proves nothing though. There's also a great number of people who wholly support homosexuality, and then it turns out they were banging dudes the whole time.
I mean, it is partially true. Just because the SJW types have abused it doesnt mean there isnt some historical precedent to it
You never heard of "The lady doth protest too much, methinks" did you?
The only one less likely than AntonioOfVenice to not know that quote is someone with the username GertrudeOfElsinore.
But still, I wouldn't confuse a quote from one character with actual empirical proof. Besides, what that quote is about is remarrying, which the character here referred to steadfastly denied that she would ever do, which offended someone who actually did that. Covering her own ass.
Let's say though that the quote is accurate. The proper analogy would be that someone who is always saying that "I AM NOT A HOMO" is more likely to be a homosexual, not someone who expresses moral opposition to homosexuality.
This is gay commie propaganda.
First the word "homophobe" is an attempt to turn the natural disgust reflex normal people have with faggots into something to be ashamed of. Second having the correct ideals but failing to live up to them doesn't invalidate the ideals.
The gay commie campaign to demonize "hypocrisy" is one of the many methods they are using to dissolve civilization. Hypocrisy and an intentionally curated "public face" is how people of different values can harmoniously live and work together through an implicitly agreed upon shared suspension of disbelief.
There's different types of reaction to fags. There's the typical disgust, which you note. Mild and unpleasant, enough to steer normies away from fags. Then there's the wild and obnoxious "I want to punch every faggot ever" which is often performative overcompensating.
A lot of communists demonstrate this kind of performative over-compensation, which I find curious.
I don't want to punch faggots, I want them to stop talking about being faggots.
There have always been faggots with us but there was a reasonable compromise 50-60 years ago. Normal people knew they were faggots, they knew normal people knew they were faggots. But it was considered rude for normal people to publicly bring up their faggotry and it was a social or, in excessive cases, a legal offense for them to be public and "proud" about it.
They kept to their designated areas, normal people got to live their lives making little mental and no physical effort to avoid faggotry. And KIDS could make it to adulthood never having to know it existed as a "lifestyle", only as something vaguely bad that they used to make fun of each other.
You seem to be trying really hard to defend your particular style of anti-homosexuality. Do you have something to tell us? 😏 Seriously though, people can have the same goals but with different motives. I'm not trying to paint everyone with the same brush.
What I wanted to get at is that there is a loud minority of communists that are obnoxiously anti-nazi to the point where they think even giving a nazi a chance to speech makes everyone in the room guilty by association. Almost like they know the nazis are right and these commies have to keep telling themselves that the nazis are evil so they don't succumb to what are obvious facts.
It gets really annoying when these rabid anti-nazis hear familiar arguments from people that have no connection with nazis and fly into their rage. Because the facts speak for themselves and people can discover them independently.