Reminds me of all the circumcision haters that unironically started linking studies done by…. John money and his students to claim emotional trauma from circumcision. Anything can be “just as” traumatic as anything if someone is convinced of the damage. This is why we have millions of women claiming ptsd from a bad date and saying it’s equal to ptsd that came from war experiences.
Are you saying removal of the tonsils is bad in children? How about the appendix? What about surgical removal of clitoromegaly or other non functional sex organs at birth?
Removing tonsils or an appendix serves a medical purpose if they become inflamed. Circumcision is cosmetic, and even if it were true that the foreskin is "non-functional," that would still be true.
An intact foreskin has 20000 nerve endings, which is four times as many as there are in the glans of your penis. First of all, it is absolute bullshit cope when doctors tell you that removing a body part that sensitive from an infant without anesthetic doesn't hurt them. Secondly, if you have been permanently disfigured in this way, you will never enjoy sex as much as a man who has not. It is genital mutilation, period.
Circumcision is cosmetic, and even if it were true that the foreskin is "non-functional," that would still be true.
So is removing non functional sex organs, there’s far more data showing positive long term health outcomes from removing the foreskin than keeping it.
An intact foreskin has 20000 nerve endings, which is four times as many as there are in the glans of your penis.
Meissner’s corpuscles, the exact same type in your fingertips.
First of all, it is absolute bullshit cope when doctors tell you that removing a body part that sensitive from an infant without anesthetic doesn't hurt them.
Anesthesia on Neonatals cause far more harm long term than short term pain that heals extremely quickly, in fact faster than any other point in a persons life, which is why they do it then. The “pain trauma” line is again sad copium done by John Money the pedophile.
Secondly, if you have been permanently disfigured in this way, you will never enjoy sex as much as a man who has not. It is genital mutilation, period.
And if you don’t receive anal penetration you aren’t enjoying “sex” as much as a man who is, as the prostate is far more sensitive than the foreskin.
The foreskin isn’t a functional part of the penis, it’s the same as arguing that you should get fucked in the ass because the prostate is more sensitive than the foreskin…
No 😂, what’s disingenuous is people who know how absolutely fraudulent Money and his ilk were/are and yet bandwagon behind his research when it comes to circumcision.
John Money was a degenerate "sexologist" who tried to prove gender was a social construct using a barbaric experiment. It's extremely ironic to use Money to poison the anti-circumcision well considering Money justified his perverse experiment with a botched circumcision in the first place.
I’m not surprised, you don’t strike me as the type to actually read medical studies
there's plenty of other research that shows brain scans of psychological harm done by circumcision to infants.
Using the same methodology done to “prove” trans kids have similar brain scans to their preferred gender, another ruse created by…. Students of John Money
If someone wants to have their dick chopped up/off, they should be an adult making their own decisions. This applies equally as it does to foreskins as it does to trannies.
Any other opinion is retarded and based on playing "my camp vs your camp" games, as you've demonstrated clearly by basing your entire argument on "you'd be in bad camp if you disagree with me."
I get you’re too retarded to realize that was the argument you made, comparing vestigial to non-vestigial. But hey, I’m sure you can make a real good argument for why the foreskin is as necessary as an entire sex organ 😂😂😂
Reminds me of all the circumcision haters that unironically started linking studies done by…. John money and his students to claim emotional trauma from circumcision. Anything can be “just as” traumatic as anything if someone is convinced of the damage. This is why we have millions of women claiming ptsd from a bad date and saying it’s equal to ptsd that came from war experiences.
As opposed to who? People who think it's reasonable to rip functional bits off of baby boys' genitalia?
(((people)))
Are you saying removal of the tonsils is bad in children? How about the appendix? What about surgical removal of clitoromegaly or other non functional sex organs at birth?
Removing tonsils or an appendix serves a medical purpose if they become inflamed. Circumcision is cosmetic, and even if it were true that the foreskin is "non-functional," that would still be true.
An intact foreskin has 20000 nerve endings, which is four times as many as there are in the glans of your penis. First of all, it is absolute bullshit cope when doctors tell you that removing a body part that sensitive from an infant without anesthetic doesn't hurt them. Secondly, if you have been permanently disfigured in this way, you will never enjoy sex as much as a man who has not. It is genital mutilation, period.
So is removing non functional sex organs, there’s far more data showing positive long term health outcomes from removing the foreskin than keeping it.
Meissner’s corpuscles, the exact same type in your fingertips.
Anesthesia on Neonatals cause far more harm long term than short term pain that heals extremely quickly, in fact faster than any other point in a persons life, which is why they do it then. The “pain trauma” line is again sad copium done by John Money the pedophile.
And if you don’t receive anal penetration you aren’t enjoying “sex” as much as a man who is, as the prostate is far more sensitive than the foreskin.
Notice he said "functional" and you reply with occasionally medically necessary surgeries of things that aren't functioning.
I gotta say, I'm disappointed. Defending Jewish pedo-sadism is the last take I excepted from you.
The foreskin isn’t a functional part of the penis, it’s the same as arguing that you should get fucked in the ass because the prostate is more sensitive than the foreskin…
Eric Clopper completely debunks all supposed benefits of circumcision in autistic detail
Fascinating, let me know when he actually writes and conducts a medical study instead of a lecture.
If your father comes to you and say "I fucked your mom" will you respond with "Source?".
You wont be wrong if you do :-]
Sorry what does that have to do with a Harvard administrator with no medical background at all giving a lecture about circumcision?
No 😂, what’s disingenuous is people who know how absolutely fraudulent Money and his ilk were/are and yet bandwagon behind his research when it comes to circumcision.
John Money was a degenerate "sexologist" who tried to prove gender was a social construct using a barbaric experiment. It's extremely ironic to use Money to poison the anti-circumcision well considering Money justified his perverse experiment with a botched circumcision in the first place.
I’m not surprised, you don’t strike me as the type to actually read medical studies
Using the same methodology done to “prove” trans kids have similar brain scans to their preferred gender, another ruse created by…. Students of John Money
If someone wants to have their dick chopped up/off, they should be an adult making their own decisions. This applies equally as it does to foreskins as it does to trannies.
Any other opinion is retarded and based on playing "my camp vs your camp" games, as you've demonstrated clearly by basing your entire argument on "you'd be in bad camp if you disagree with me."
Sorry, I’ll validate your opinion when you don’t compare a vestigial piece of skin to the entire removal of your sex organs
Dang, this homie went with the "its just a clump of cells bro" argument. We dealing with a real strong position.
I get you’re too retarded to realize that was the argument you made, comparing vestigial to non-vestigial. But hey, I’m sure you can make a real good argument for why the foreskin is as necessary as an entire sex organ 😂😂😂
Why even bother mentioning emotional trauma when you're straight up mutilating babies?
Do you even bother to look at your own stupidity? You’re literally making the exact same leftist talking point about intersex kids…