I get you’re too retarded to realize that was the argument you made, comparing vestigial to non-vestigial. But hey, I’m sure you can make a real good argument for why the foreskin is as necessary as an entire sex organ 😂😂😂
Interesting, do you believe people born with clitoromegaly and non-functional sex organs should be forced to wait until 18 to remove them when the surgical risks are far higher as well, or are you a hypocrite?
Are they going to die or live in intensive suffering without? Then you act in their best interests, which is to perform. As you do with all those "vestigial" organs you keep trying to use an a gotcha. We don't just cut open toddlers to remove the appendix as soon as they are born either.
You know what has high surgical risks? Performing surgery, the thing you are advocating to do to all people no matter what. So you probably shouldn't start trying to act like you care about that now either.
Are they going to die or live in intensive suffering without? Then you act in their best interests, which is to perform.
No, like the foreskin they are entirely vestigial. So you would force them to wait until 18 correct?
As you do with all those "vestigial" organs you keep trying to use an a gotcha. We don't just cut open toddlers to remove the appendix as soon as they are born either.
Hate to break it to you, but the foreskin is not an organ. And the reason we don’t remove the appendix is an internal versus external surgery have vastly different complications and risks.
You know what has high surgical risks? Performing surgery, the thing you are advocating to do to all people no matter what. So you probably shouldn't start trying to act like you care about that now either.
The safest time to perform these surgeries is neonatal, we have known this for decades now. I don’t advocate for everyone to be forced to be circumcised, instead I would rather parents make informed choices on the matter, whether that be to circumcise or not.
As someone that has actually lost a finger tip, trust me, you don’t even notice the difference, still works just fine. Good luck coping with the fact you’re too retarded to realize your spewing sexual revolution talking points made up by pedophiles 😂.
So you're actually fine (or at the very least neutral) if we cut the finger tips of all newborn from now on then, right? There's no difference, and it's just skin, so why bother keeping it?
Also let's cut some skin around the ears, while we're at it.
Is that what I said? Or did I say that the sensitivity is the same. Last I checked fingertips provide a value without long term cost, unlike the foreskin, where the only value is in potential sexual gratification and the potential cost is far greater when looking at penile cancer, especially when you look at the fact adult circumcision carries far more negatives and harm when having to remove the foreskin that is potentially cancerous. You morons keep trying to scream there are no benefits to circumcision which is flat out false, and that’s not even getting into the socioeconomic differences between circumcised and uncircumcised males.
I get you’re too retarded to realize that was the argument you made, comparing vestigial to non-vestigial. But hey, I’m sure you can make a real good argument for why the foreskin is as necessary as an entire sex organ 😂😂😂
I stated a principle not an argument. The thing about principles is they apply from top to bottom. It doesn't matter if its vestigial or not.
I don't need to argue why its necessary, as you've yet to prove why it is.
Interesting, do you believe people born with clitoromegaly and non-functional sex organs should be forced to wait until 18 to remove them when the surgical risks are far higher as well, or are you a hypocrite?
Are they going to die or live in intensive suffering without? Then you act in their best interests, which is to perform. As you do with all those "vestigial" organs you keep trying to use an a gotcha. We don't just cut open toddlers to remove the appendix as soon as they are born either.
You know what has high surgical risks? Performing surgery, the thing you are advocating to do to all people no matter what. So you probably shouldn't start trying to act like you care about that now either.
No, like the foreskin they are entirely vestigial. So you would force them to wait until 18 correct?
Hate to break it to you, but the foreskin is not an organ. And the reason we don’t remove the appendix is an internal versus external surgery have vastly different complications and risks.
The safest time to perform these surgeries is neonatal, we have known this for decades now. I don’t advocate for everyone to be forced to be circumcised, instead I would rather parents make informed choices on the matter, whether that be to circumcise or not.
I mean, do you really need the tip of your pinky finger?
I bet if you never had it in the first place, it wouldn't even bother you.
Anyway, good luck coping with the fact that someone carved up your genitals without your consent, that must suck.
As someone that has actually lost a finger tip, trust me, you don’t even notice the difference, still works just fine. Good luck coping with the fact you’re too retarded to realize your spewing sexual revolution talking points made up by pedophiles 😂.
So you're actually fine (or at the very least neutral) if we cut the finger tips of all newborn from now on then, right? There's no difference, and it's just skin, so why bother keeping it?
Also let's cut some skin around the ears, while we're at it.
Is that what I said? Or did I say that the sensitivity is the same. Last I checked fingertips provide a value without long term cost, unlike the foreskin, where the only value is in potential sexual gratification and the potential cost is far greater when looking at penile cancer, especially when you look at the fact adult circumcision carries far more negatives and harm when having to remove the foreskin that is potentially cancerous. You morons keep trying to scream there are no benefits to circumcision which is flat out false, and that’s not even getting into the socioeconomic differences between circumcised and uncircumcised males.